Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chestnut Hill Realty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Chestnut Hill Realty

Chestnut Hill Realty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article, in my opinion, does not meet the Wikipedia's notability criteria. In addition, the article was initially created by a user whose name corresponded to the address of Chestnut Hill Realty (see talk page). Overall, this page seems like blatant self-promotion, which has no place on Wikipedia DuckWrangler97 (talk) 18:57, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Massachusetts. Skynxnex (talk) 19:04, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Delete Plenty of hits for them donating to charity and about properties they've acquired, very much routine business dealings found in the press. Nothing we can use for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 19:45, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Promotional article where just about every significant assertion comes from the websites/publications of, or out of interviews with, the principals. I'd ask the article creator (an SPA whose sole Wikipedia contribution this was) to disclose a COI, if they weren't long gone. Ravenswing 06:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.