Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castle Rock Water Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Castle Crags. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Castle Rock Water Company

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no reliable sources for notability: a self-published book, a mention in one sentence of a brochure on the state park which now incorporates it, and a notice in a local paper DGG ( talk ) 15:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Castle Crags. The article will fill in (as a new section) a gap in the history of the park, which starts with the gold rush and then jumps to recent times. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per Peterkingiron. There are a few more sources for the water company. This one (Chico News & Review) profiles the company and also gives a bit of history, including bottling the water starting in 1889. This one (Mt. Shasta News) also focuses on the company in terms of a national bottled water competition and also refers to the 19th Century bottling practices. (And, BTW, I think these sources meet WP:SIGCOV in that they are two regional news organizations. And so the article meets notability guidelines sufficiently for a merger into the Castle Crags article.) This article would be a nice fit after the end of the History section of the Castle Crags article. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:17, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.