Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caroline Henry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (talk) 11:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Henry

Caroline Henry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD, subject is a non-notable journalist. French Wikipedia provides even less references, the ones here are of her interviewing, she's not the subject. Fails WP:ANYBIO. Ifnord (talk) 22:32, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 23:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talkcontribs) 23:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:38, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Article alerts One of the wikiprojects is alerting its members to this AFD. I note that there had been no notification of this on this page. WCMemail 11:49, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you asked, I believe they should do. These alerts seem to bring out the whole project to defend some poorly drafted articles on non-notable individuals. WCMemail 00:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That has happened on exactly 0 of the AfD's you've commented on. One response on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roula Partheniou is from a probably WiR member; one response on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia P. Pinegar is from an editor in the LDS wikiproject who's edited that article since 2011. On one you didn't comment on, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yanagida Toshiko, the alert, whether wikiproject or personal, brought its own creator back to vote delete. If its seems to be an AfD where it's an issue, of course! However, it doesn't seem to have any realistic point. originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 00:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
On one AFD I've just counted 10 members of the same project arguing to keep what should be a routine nomination of a non-notable subject. WCMemail 00:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's why I said, "If its seems to be an AfD where it's an issue, of course," and it's clear that that's why you're posting this on pages where it's not an issue. It's just retaliation that isn't productive towards any other AfDs. originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 00:49, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If I alert a project, I make a note on the AFD. I simply felt that others should be aware of what was happening. Sigh, when did wikipedia abandon its policy of assuming good faith? WCMemail 00:58, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If you want people to assume good faith, maybe consider not retaliating on multiple AfDs against a single wikiproject. Why not assume other editors are also editing in good faith and trying to improve articles? Why not suggest to the article alert bot creators/maintainers that they should leave alerts on AfD pages as well? I do believe you want to improve wiki and have fair AfDs, but you don't seem to believe that of other people, and you've done a lot of things solely to retaliate against a single wikiproject. originalmesshow u doin that busta rhyme? 01:11, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Caroline_Henry&oldid=854443694"