Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yanagida Toshiko

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, with thanks to Johnpacklambert for being able to self-reflect on the article. Mojo Hand (talk) 18:52, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yanagida Toshiko

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable subject that fails WP:BASIC, as per source searches. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:58, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Name is written 柳田聡子, for those searching Japanese-language sources. Bakazaka (talk) 23:52, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the translation; I have added the find sources template atop with it. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:55, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete When I created this article 8 years ago I think I was a little too enthusiastic about being able to show people as notable. The only clear sourcing on her is author/background information connected with a BYU studies quarterly article that was a translation of her memoirs. This is just not the level of reliable source coverage to justify having an article, as much as I wish it was otherwise.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:09, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:33, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Lambert; no claims of importance or significance, and the references don't demonstrate GNG being met. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:44, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.