Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capalaba Central Shopping Centre (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 18:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Capalaba Central Shopping Centre

Capalaba Central Shopping Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. last AfD was 8 years ago but we now have a better consensus on what makes a notable shopping centre. gnews search shows very limited and routine coverage. LibStar (talk) 05:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 02:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 04:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Seems pretty notable might need to be kept for another month if no specific source is found then delete. BugMenn (talk) 18:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

seems notable is not the same as notable. WP:ITSNOTABLE. LibStar (talk) 08:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Admittedly without a thorough understanding of the notability criteria for shopping centres, I believe fundamentally the article and content has encyclopedic value that could be of informational benefit to a reader. Aeonx (talk) 06:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

could be of international benefit? How? You present zero argument as to how a notability guideline is met. LibStar (talk) 10:36, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. the usual minimum size is 100,000 sq. meters, and this is one-third of it. Consistency in things like that is desirale. DGG ( talk ) 06:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:DIRECTORY. Shopping centers are not inherently notable and this one is on a small size. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Capalaba_Central_Shopping_Centre_(2nd_nomination)&oldid=1078081339"