Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CK's Supermarkets

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to not be notable. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 05:26, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CK's Supermarkets

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. Insufficient coverage. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:21, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go} 23:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go} 23:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015^{Let It Go} 23:15, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now perhaps as News, browsers and Highbeam all found considerable links but I'm not yet sure if it's solidly notable. I'm willing to reconsider if better improved or if these show notability with that I would be willing to improve it if needed. SwisterTwister talk 23:29, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:12, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV clearly non notable.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient coverage. Vanamonde93 (talk) 04:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.