Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buck (video game) (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:38, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Buck (video game)

Buck (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a cancelled video game that I do not believe passes the WP:GNG. While the article cites several references, these are all merely reporting on its initial Kickstarter. I can find no actual coverage of the game in reliable sources from after this period, or even on the game itself rather than on the kickstarter that funded it. Rorshacma (talk) 22:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Rorshacma (talk) 22:03, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The Kickstarter Compendium link is not dead, it's located here. That said, I am not seeing SIGCOV here that is sufficient for a standalone article. It's mostly trivial mentions. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:18, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment [1] is a pretty good source, but nothing else stands out as in-depth enough to support an article. Eluchil404 (talk) 00:18, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:22, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, doesn't pass WP:GNG. Even if the short PC Gamer article could be considered SIGCOV, it alone isn't enough. --Mika1h (talk) 16:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.