Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brownism (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Shimeru (talk) 07:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brownism

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has existed since April 2007 and is uncited, no such thing exists. Delete, no content of any value to merge. Off2riorob (talk) 15:51, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unsourced twaddle, nothing worth merging. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 16:38, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Crap. Not even worth the word delete. Szzuk (talk) 21:23, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, without prejudice to re-posting something better sourced. A list of ministers broadly considered to be allies of Brown by third-party sources might be acceptable. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pathetic. Nageh (talk) 22:23, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think this needs to be kept, it is an important part of British Politics and needs to be kept to highlight the differences between brown and blair. 91.104.174.164 (talk) 21:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Completely unsourced and no sign of notability. Looks like some pretty transient naming of a (non-)movement. Nageh (talk) 08:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.