Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brady plc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brady_plc

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Brady plc does not meet Wikipedia's GNG. Although they are a publicly traded company, that alone does not make them notable.

"There has been considerable discussion over time whether publicly traded corporations, or at least publicly traded corporations listed on major stock exchanges such as the NYSE and other comparable international stock exchanges, are inherently notable. Consensus has been that notability is not automatic in this (or any other) case." WP:Listed

They have very minimal press coverage. They have a few articles from unreliable third party sources, a lot of press releases, and directory listings / profiles. Other than that, they have nothing. The article also has edits from a banned user named Brady plc, who is clearly a SPA. I don't see how this obscure company meets Wikipedia's notability standards. Sonstephen0 (talk) 19:37, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:57, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:57, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - very shallow bits of listings, and lacks significant coverage in depth. Bearian (talk) 18:38, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete . Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 03:11, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.