Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradley Shavit Artson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley Shavit Artson

Bradley Shavit Artson (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

while finding sources, i could only find self-biographies and some articles written by them online. Password ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Authors, Philosophy, Judaism, Germany, California, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:42, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Leaning Keep
  • Article about him in Jewish Journal[1]
  • Starred review in Publishers' Weekly of God of Becoming and Relationship: The Dynamic Nature of Process Theology[2]
  • A journal article about his work[3] --Jahaza (talk) 07:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Some more academic articles discussing his work: [4], [5], [6] [7], [8] (yes it's on academia.edu but it's a copy of a journal article). The article does need to be completely rewritten, but I don't think WP:TNT is justified. Apocheir (talk) 22:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: New sources look fine, including the article about him and the book reviews. Easily passes notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:46, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.