Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin Suisse (2nd nomination)

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2020 June 5.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bitcoin Suisse

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article appears to be mainly WP:PROMO and does not seem to meet WP:GNG, because it doesn't look like there are multiple references that are independent, significant, reliable and secondary at the same time. It seems to be a lot of WP:REFBOMBING. Article can be kept if notability can be proved, but at this point I'm not convinced.

I did some research into various users contributing to the article discovered quite a few WP:SPA accounts:

I think this is against the policies and guidelines of Wikipedia.

Streepjescode (talk) 17:28, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 April 29. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:46, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete advert. Hyperbolick (talk) 17:57, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:51, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:54, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:55, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Note that most references are press releases, churnalism or non-reliable. There's a few reliable sources (e.g. [1], [2], [3]), but far from WP:ORGDEPTH from what I found so far. --MarioGom (talk) 19:04, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MarioGom: If that's your conclusion, then please vote. Streepjescode (talk) 06:28, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Streepjescode, sure, I was waiting to have some more time for a deeper search. MarioGom (talk) 07:37, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: there is some WP:ROUTINE coverage at Finews.ch ([4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]), which could apparently meet WP:RS except for the Advertorials section. It is borderline regarding WP:GNG. I see this company quickly gaining notability if it really manages to get the banking license approved in Switzerland, but at the moment it does not seem to cut it. --MarioGom (talk) 07:42, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The article's been here years; it's an eternal WP:TOOSOON - David Gerard (talk) 08:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete refbombed low-quality cryptocurrency promotional content - David Gerard (talk) 08:40, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Thank you to MarioGom for wading through the muck to highlight the RS, and I agree with the determination that these are not substantial, therefore subject fails WP:GNG. Pegnawl (talk) 15:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.