Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhakti Narasimha Swami

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to ISKCON. Black Kite (t) (c) 23:29, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bhakti Narasimha Swami

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable ISKCON swami. No reliable, independent sources to assert notability. Gaura79 (talk) 12:40, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Into Iskcon article. Needs more material for his own article. (User) Mb (Talk) 04:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Trivial third-party coverage, all other references are ISKCON publications. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 05:15, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per notability. Also, please see the USA Today article. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 03:08, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 03:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 03:29, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.