Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayumi Oka (actress) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ayumi Oka (actress)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Microstub about non-notable actress without sources. » Shadowowl | talk 19:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete No sources to prove notability and online search yields no results. The article only offers one short sentence about the actress. Gameinfirmary (talk) 19:41, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Japanese Wikipedia article shows involvement in around 40 TV shows and movies, so "speedy" may be overdoing it. Not to mention that a previous nomination was closed as "keep." Dekimasuよ! 20:08, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Previous AfD reached consensus, and the history of the subject has not changed. Search of recent Japanese-language sources finds Japanese news coverage mostly repeating personal announcements from her blog, for example [1] [2], so those are not useful for establishing notability. The corresponding jawiki article shows a track record of mostly minor roles, which can be confirmed by a quick Oricon search, for example the recurring role in the final season of 大好き!五つ子. The Japanese news articles about her typically mention her appearances in 半沢直樹 (Hanzawa Naoki) and 3年B組金八先生 (Kinpachi-sensei) as the reason readers might know her. Overall probably passes WP:NACTOR#1 based on early career and supporting roles in multiple notable TV series, and there's nothing to suggest that the previous AfD was erroneous in its assessment of notability. Bakazaka (talk) 20:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. It is always wise to check the corresponding articles in other language Wikipedias before nominating an article for deletion. Editors who cannot read the language in question can use Google Translate to get a rough translation that should be sufficient to allow them to evaluate sources. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:35, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Japanese version has 2 blogs as sources. » Shadowowl | talk 20:43, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Added "find sources" template using Japanese name. Bakazaka (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In Japanese there is significant coverage from reliable sources. [3][4][5]--Oakshade (talk) 04:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in view of the extra reliable sources coverage identified above, passes WP:NACTOR Atlantic306 (talk) 19:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per the sources Oakshade provided. I would say that all of these are reliable and independent enough for the article to pass WP:GNG, and they significantly cover the topic. However, we do need to make sure these sources get added to the article, as the current sourcing isn't sufficient to pass the notability guidelines.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 15:55, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.