Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Pacitti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Looks like WP:CSD#G5 as well ~ Amory (u • t • c) 12:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Pacitti

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a BLP about a non-notable YouTuber. The subject is allegedly notable for WhatCulture (which is so notable that it doesn't have an article) Cultaholic (which is so notable that it doesn't have an article) and WhatCulture ProWrestling aka Defiant Wrestling (which is so notable that it is up for AfD for a third time and is almost certainly going to be deleted again). So the article seeks to inherit notability from things that are not notable themselves and notability is not inherited anyway. Is there notability outside of that? I'm not seeing it. Sure, he has a tiny bit of media coverage but nothing that adds up to significant coverage by reliable sources and that is the line it has to cross to be kept. There has been persistent spamming and promotion around the topic of WCPW/Defiant and I feel that a pre-emptive salting might be in order here. DanielRigal (talk) 18:54, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Galatz ^Talk 19:02, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Galatz ^Talk 19:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Galatz ^Talk 19:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I see nothing to support WP:GNG. 2 out of the 6 references are to the same passing billboard ad which does not have anything lasting. 3 of the 6 have to do with a project not him. The last one is an interview. - Galatz ^Talk 19:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't meet general notability guidelines - a couple of tabloid articles regarding a single publicity stunt, an interview by a (presumably amateur) 19-year-old video games writer, a few trivial mentions in pro-wrestling media relating to a company of dubious notability. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 23:43, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:SIGCOV requirements.LM2000 (talk) 05:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete I feel as though if he were not tied to WhatCulture, he wouldn't have ever been made. He does have some other claims to fame such as the Pinfall Documentary, but hardly enough for Wikipedia's criteria. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:28, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anitta Pitta (talk • contribs) 23:21, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.