Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Lyons (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Lyons

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article contains two, possibly three, decent sources. Others are unreliable, reviews, or PR. Fails WP:GNG Jppcap (talk) 12:59, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Ive looked into this before and the article had a ton of dead links, no real news about the guy when I checked and I dont really think he meets notability standards. S3venevan (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:56, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No real demonstration of notability. The sources are weak, and too dependent on the input of the subject, which is generally a sign he is not notable, since people have not bothered to indepdently verify his claims.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.