Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Carr (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 15:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Carr

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In accordance with this. And that the person is not notable. The sources link to a forum and it also reads like a CV.
Would also suggest locking page creation Lihaas (talk) 14:27, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Nothing in the refs, promotional cv, first afd was very clear. Szzuk (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:28, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Another WP:BLP sourced only with web ephemera. Agricola44 (talk) 16:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete There are no special guidelines for art curators and so the exhibition list can't really be used for notability (unlike the artists). So have to fall back to WP:GNG and not seeing it. -- GreenC 17:04, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.