Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009–10 Cambridge United F.C. season

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 08:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2009–10 Cambridge United F.C. season

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are some good sources in the article but notice that they discuss events from previous seasons and nothing to do with the 2009–10 Cambridge United F.C. season. This fails WP:NSEASONS anyway but I also think it fails WP:GNG. Spiderone 08:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 08:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 08:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - well-written article but ultimately fails GNG/NSEASONS. Giant Snowman 10:45, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails NSEASONS. REDMAN 2019 (talk) 15:37, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Per Spiderone's rationale for nominating. Celestina007 (talk) 00:04, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per NSEASONS, a lot of effort has been put into the article. I am surprised it's also been up for 10 years! Govvy (talk) 08:57, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NSEASONS failure. Number 5 7 12:17, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.