User talk:Zupfk

Welcome!

Hello, Zupfk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Ysangkok (talk) 19:13, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Adrian Zaluschi. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:19, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Narcis Damian. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:20, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Tiberiu Chivoiu. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Samuel Jitaru. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Ion Cătălin. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Mihai Voiculescu. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Călin Toma. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Marian Fuchs. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Răzvan Dobriceanu. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Robert Szalkay. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Alexandru Nicula. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Răzvan Moroşanu. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consider this your only warning. Reference your BLPs and cease to create more unreferenced ones or you will be blocked. Ironholds (talk) 03:48, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When updating football players' stats in infoboxes (like you did in Vlad Munteanu) please update also the parameter "pcupdate" which shows at which date the number of goals and apps was correct. Simply increasing the appearances by one make the stats in the infobox plain wrong. To remind the editors of this there are often comments in the source code of the infobox like so it shouldn't be to difficult to remember this. --Jaellee (talk) 21:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tiberiu Chivoiu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 12:25, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Răzvan Moroşanu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 02:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Răzvan Dobriceanu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 02:36, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mihai Voiculescu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 01:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that for a footballer to be notable enough to merit an article on Wikipedia he or she must have played a competitive match between to fully professional clubs. (WP:ATHLETE, WP:FOOTYN). Most of the articles pertaining to FC Timişoara II players that you created do not meet this criterion, and I have proposed them for deletion. Cheers. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Sepsi in 2009.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from img146.imageshack.us/img146/5774/sepsi.jpg. As a copyright violation, File:Sepsi in 2009.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Sepsi in 2009.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Sepsi in 2009.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Sepsi in 2009.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Sepsi in 2009.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. せいきょういく (talk) 05:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Parks in 2010.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  fetchcomms☛ 15:02, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove proposed deletion tags, as you did with this article, without justifying your reason for doing so in your edit summary or on the articles talk page. I have nominated this article for deletion and I invite you to take part in the discussion here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not violate our copyright policy by uploading images to Wikipedia that you took from somewhere else. If you continue to do so you will be blocked from editing. (If you have permission from the copyright owner to upload the images here, please let us know and follow the instructions at WP:Donating copyrighted material). I have brought this issue up at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Large amount of copyvio images uploaded by User:Zupfk. Thank you, Theleftorium 15:49, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When updating football players' stats in infoboxes (like you did in Vlad Munteanu - again) please update also the parameter "pcupdate" which shows at which date the number of goals and apps was correct. Simply increasing the appearances by one make the stats in the infobox plain wrong. --Jaellee (talk) 16:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK I will give it time but check this sites

http://www.adevarul.ro/sport/fotbal_international/Zenga_prezentat-urmeaza_Cocis_0_259174603.html

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/football/bresciano-swaps-palermo-for-middle-east-20100513-v1q5.html

http://www.onlinesport.ro/stiri/fotbal/fotbal-intern/liga-1/poli-timisoara/62790/cocis-pleaca-la-al-nasr.htm

Hms911 (talk) 21:13, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please clarify why you deleted these 2 names from the name chronology? The club was moved, it was not founded a new club (DerGelbeMann (talk) 17:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on FC Timisoara. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to FC Timisoara, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Hello, Zupfk. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Zupfk reported by User: DerGelbeMann (Result: prot 1w).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 17:54, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Duško Dukić. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Duško Dukić has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NW (Talk) 00:14, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask what this edit was all about? NW (Talk) 13:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And this one. Please do not remove maintainance tags without actually addressing the concerns indicated. Active Banana (talk) 14:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can you explain, why after receiving a "final warning" about creating unsourced articles about living people on March 18 [1] you created this article [2] about a living person on May 29 and have not included any sources? Active Banana (talk) 15:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Francisco Yeste. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. And also, there is no need to shout. See WP:CIVIL. Pstanton (talk) 17:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:National stadium bucuresti.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.gsp.ro/gsp-special/diverse/foto-vezi-aici-cum-va-arata-noul-stadion-national-ce-parere-ai-167911.html. As a copyright violation, File:National stadium bucuresti.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:National stadium bucuresti.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:National stadium bucuresti.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:National stadium bucuresti.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:National stadium bucuresti.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

I tagged this as a 'blatant copyright violation'. You wrote "I (Zupfk (talk)) created this work entirely by myself". You neither created the model yourself nor did you even create the photo yourself. Martin H. (talk) 21:31, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Coregraphy against partizan.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://violamania.gsp.ro/stiri/6467/premiile-romanian-ultras-cvucs-la-poli-partizan-cea-mai-buna-coregrafie-a-turului-de-campionat.htm. As a copyright violation, File:Coregraphy against partizan.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Coregraphy against partizan.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Coregraphy against partizan.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Coregraphy against partizan.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Coregraphy against partizan.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 21:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gigi Becali a declarat la GSPTV ca a semnat pe 5 ani.

The article Alexandru Stan has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. elektrikSHOOS 11:36, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue.. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. elektrikSHOOS 11:39, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salut. Nu mai adauga transferuri si numiri de antrenori dupa ce citesti despre ele in gazetele de sport. Alea nu pot fi considerate surse. Wikipedia se vrea o enciclopedie cat mai exacta, si nu un ziar care sa vanda zvonuri. La editarile referitoare la transferuri sau numiri de antrenori te rog sa adaugi o sursa OFICIALA, altfel ele vor fi sterse. Multumesac. (Gabinho (talk) 11:30, 9 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

The article Marin Barbu has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 00:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Zupfk. You seem to be edit-warring on this article, often making more than three reverts in 24 hours. This violates WP:3RR. If you continue, you may be blocked. Use the article talk page to try to get consensus for your changes. EdJohnston (talk) 22:50, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The weekly awards which you added at the current Liga I season article are too particular (thus a case of indiscriminate information, do not have a lasting effect on the season and are therefore not notable (see also WP:EFFECT), are not sourced (thus failing WP:V) and further seem to be not officially handed out by LFP, since they would have been listed anywhere on the official LFP page by now. In general, awards of any kind should only be included if they are official awards by the organizing body of the competition (e.g. the League or the FA). The only exception on that rule is when a merited news outlet names a team of the year which is widely accepted by the public opinion. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 16:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there ZUPFK, VASCO here,

As you did in Aderito Waldemar Alves Carvalho, Cosmin Contra, László Sepsi and several other Romanian footballers or foreigns playin in the country, please stop adding subsections in CLUB CAREER. Oh, i mean sub-section, as you do it ONLY for Poli. Please stop doing that, it makes no sense, at all, makes readers think it's a special thing in CLUB CAREER when it's not, it's just a normal club, like all the others.

Please respect other people's work. After you told me Contra plays for Poli as a midfielder, i stopped reverting that in box, maybe you can do the same now? Thanks, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:52, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:News-20100408-08494560-265084030.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. ZUPFK, VASCO from Portugal here,

Why did you have the reaction you had at László Sepsi? "Get out!"? I can edit there if i want to, you are a Romanian user and this is a Romanian footballer, but you are not the owner of the articles of Romanian footballers or Wikipedia. I am only wanting to help, as you are. In your last additions, you wrote, in VERY POOR English "He impressed at Gloria for offensive game, and has attracted the eye from Europe teams. He making 45 apparences for Gloria", which means nothing in English, i have corrected it, i can correct the article can't i?

Please respect the other people's work, i am not a vandal to make you talk to me like that. I am going to keep attention to this article. Until some other time - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 03:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vasco is correct here. Could you please take the time to read WP:OWN and try to act more respectfully to your fellow contributors? NW (Talk) 18:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't insert statements such as this unless a) it is backed by a reliable source and b) you can explain why it's worth noting. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 22:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Flares at Romanian Cup Final.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:2008-2009-poli-steaua05.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:2008-2009-pandurii-poli0-1-06~0.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2009 11 05-rsca-poli06.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2009-2010-poli-steaua20.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2009-2010-poli-vfbstuttgart09~0.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2009 11 23-poli-dinamo2-0-05.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2010 04 19-poli-cfr06.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2010 04 19-poli-cfr04.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:2010 08 19-poli-mcity 03.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:2008-2009-poli-steaua05.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --(ESkog)^(Talk) 12:52, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Helder arriving.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 13:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Zupfk. Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If you feel that the redirects AEK Bucureşti and Fulgerul Bragadiru should be deleted, list them at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion with your rationale for deletion. Thank you. Jon.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 08:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Luchin srdjan2010.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mediafax.ro/sport/luchin-sabau-lucreaza-foarte-mult-pe-fazele-defensive-4624749. As a copyright violation, File:Luchin srdjan2010.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Luchin srdjan2010.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Luchin srdjan2010.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Luchin srdjan2010.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Luchin srdjan2010.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tames-iulian.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Mera-ioan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:25, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask your source for changing the ranking, as the next release isn't due until tomorrow. // Finns 12:32, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank redirect pages as you have been doing at Fulgerul Bragadiru and AEK Bucureşti. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If you believe these redirects should be deleted, list them at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion with your rationale for deletion but do not just blank pages. The next time you blank a page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:36, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Contra-cosmin.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mediafax.ro/sport/cosmin-contra-ma-retrag-din-fotbal-nu-se-poate-sta-in-mizeria-asta-de-campionat-6704097. As a copyright violation, File:Contra-cosmin.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Contra-cosmin.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Contra-cosmin.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Contra-cosmin.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Contra-cosmin.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Gabinho^>:) 09:08, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Pantilimon-costel.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gabinho^>:) 09:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Cisovsky-marian.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gabinho^>:) 09:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:Chiacu-hristu.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gabinho^>:) 09:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is bad enough that you upload non-free images but claiming them as your own work is simply deceitful. Please stop. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a last warning - any more (c) uploads or materials & you will be permanently blocked. Skier Dude (talk 01:57, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When you update this parameter, please update the pcupdate parameter! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.226.50 (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

amice, esti cretin sau idiot? de ce l-ai pus de chivu fotbalistul anului 2010? acel premiu se acorda de gazeta sporturilor. acest premiu nu a fost inca acordat. acum se voteaza, intra pe gsp pentru mai multe informatii. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.234.14 (talk) 09:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Romanian Foreign of the Year, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jjmihai (talk) 09:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Template:Romanian Fans of the Year is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Romanian Fans of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jjmihai (talk) 09:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Template:Romanian Come-Back of the Year is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Romanian Come-Back of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jjmihai (talk) 09:55, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Template:Romanian Young Player of the Year is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Romanian Young Player of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jjmihai (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Template:Romanian Foreign of the Year is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Romanian Foreign of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jjmihai (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Template:Romanian Young player of the Year is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Romanian Young player of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jjmihai (talk) 09:56, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Template:Romanian Striker of the Year is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Romanian Striker of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jjmihai (talk) 09:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Template:Romanian Goalkeeper of the Year is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Romanian Goalkeeper of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jjmihai (talk) 09:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Template:Romanian Defender of the Year is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Template:Romanian Defender of the Year until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jjmihai (talk) 09:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because you have persisted in various kinds of unconstructive editing, including page blanking, creating unsuitable articles, and even more seriously uploading numerous copyright violations, despite plenty of warnings, and because you have used this account to evade a block on your earlier account. If you wish to request an unblock you must do so from your original account, not attempt to avoid the block by creating another account. JamesBWatson (talk) 17:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Romanian Fans of the Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jjmihai (talk) 15:34, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Romanian Defender of the Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jjmihai (talk) 08:45, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Romanian Striker of the Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jjmihai (talk) 08:46, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Romanian Come-Back of the Year has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Jjmihai (talk) 08:47, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Fc timisoara stadium dp.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/25253246. As a copyright violation, File:Fc timisoara stadium dp.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Fc timisoara stadium dp.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Fc timisoara stadium dp.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Fc timisoara stadium dp.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Fc timisoara stadium dp.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

I wonder, why we not yet removed all your stolen files from our project? --Martin H. (talk) 07:51, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:2010 08 19-poli-mcity 03.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tempo-poli.ro/com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=303&start=280 (aug 21, 2010 3:12 pm). As a copyright violation, File:2010 08 19-poli-mcity 03.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:2010 08 19-poli-mcity 03.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:2010 08 19-poli-mcity 03.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:2010 08 19-poli-mcity 03.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:2010 08 19-poli-mcity 03.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 07:57, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:2010 04 19-poli-cfr06.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.tempo-poli.ro/com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=303&start=240 (apr 21, 2010 8:09 am). As a copyright violation, File:2010 04 19-poli-cfr06.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:2010 04 19-poli-cfr06.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:2010 04 19-poli-cfr06.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:2010 04 19-poli-cfr06.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:2010 04 19-poli-cfr06.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files that you uploaded have been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because their copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the files copyright status cannot be verified, they may be deleted. You are welcome to add comments to their entry at the discussion if you are interested in them not being deleted. Thank you. Martin H. (talk) 18:43, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Acsmu-politehnica-iasi.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:39, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gheorghe Chivorchian has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:16, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Marian Fuchs has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:21, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FC Politehnica Timişoara squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Leyo 17:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Alexandru Stan has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:35, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Valentin Sandu has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:37, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marian Fuchs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marian Fuchs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]