User talk:EdJohnston
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
User:HD86
- HD86 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Sorry to bother you with this Ed. But user:HD86 has been engaging in disruptive editing along with a fair dose of personal attacks. Their only edits since 21 March 2024 have been to Aleppo, Aleppo talk page, and my talk page(after I posted a 3rr on their talk page). I also posted on their talk page that it appeared they had taken the information from the Ali Janbulad article, though I am not absolutely sure of that.
- HD86 added a sentence with no source.[1] Aintabli removed it citing no source.[2] HD86 then launches into a personal attack-ridden edit summary, stating it is Aintabli's responsibility to find sources for HD86's edit.You are so lazy and dumb that you didn't even bother to check the Wikipedia page on the subject. You are supposed to remove unreferenced info only if you think they are incorrect. IIdiots like yourself are the reason why I stopped, Undid revision 1214909312 by Aintabli (talk) Reverting vandalism. I believe it is clear that this person doesn't seriously think the info is false, unless he can't access the Wikipedia page
- After a few more reverts I post a 3rr on HD86's talk page[3] and then I am told on my talk page, "And by the way, I certainly added much more info and citations to that article than you did, so it would have been better if you copied the references yourself at least to show that you are a positive contributer. That would have been a better use of your time."[4] Thus, now is it my responsibility to reference HD86's addition to the Aleppo article.
- Wikaviani removed the unsourced addition of HD86.[5] HD86 reverts then states not once, but twice, "There is a link to another Wikipedia page. Please make a better use of your time by adding references and new info to the article instead of deleting what other people contribute.", Please be helpful and add a reference yourself. You may look at the relevant Wikipedia page. Now it is Wikaviani's responsiblity to cite HD86's addition to the Aleppo article.
- HD86 then posts on the Aleppo article talk page that 3 editors have removed their unsourced addition. "So far three different users have attempted to remove the paragraph about Ali janbulad under the claim that it is "unreferenced". Which is false, only two editors have reverted Hd86; Aintabli and Wikaviani. Then they call Wikaviani a disruptive editor.What makes you a disruptive editor is your intent.
- I would say HD86 is disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. They've refused time and again to add a source to their unsourced addition. They have wasted 5 edits on the Aleppo talk page, 4 reverts on the Aleppo article, and 3 edits on my talk page, instead of addressing the issue of adding an unsourced sentence to the Aleppo article. Clearly an issue of WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. It was their inability to hear what another editor says that got them banned from my talk page.
- Honestly, I don't think HD86 is here to build a community encyclopedia. --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Ignore this concern Ed. Aintabli filed a report at WP:ANI. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)