User talk:WhisperToMe/Archive11

Yes. Whispertome, this tragic murder of a child occurred in Cypress Park, now about 24 years ago and resulted in a sensational national news story. And yes, I am quite certain the circumstances surrounding this event were NOT as depicted in newspaper articles or other news media. Living in this neighborhood I have heard multiple and conflicting accounts of what occurred, and if you know anything about gangs and the inner-city, getting people to come forward with the truth is usually next to impossible. But of course the media jumped on this. "Child killed in gang shootout!" It's this fixation with the cheap and sensational that I expect Wikipedia to be above.

What I find truly offensive and inappropriate in your persistent posting of this is:

1) While this 24-year-old shooting is tragic, it is HARDLY definitive of Cypress Park -- an economically struggling but wonderful neighborhood which you are harming by perpetuating a non-neutral and sensational association with gangs and violence which happens to fall into the "if it bleeds it leads" school of journalism.

This is a notable event with some cloudy details that did occur in this neighborhood, but it is NOT the defining event for the neighborhood that you present it to be, and I would argue it not appropriate for this page where people want an overview of the neighborhood, not a biased association implying that the neighborhood is bad or high crime or gang ridden, etc. At best, this should be a small footnote way at the bottom of the page.

2) You continually place your paragraph about the "sensational gang murder" at the top of the article right after the description of Cypress Park as a neighborhood in Los angeles and the table of contents.

This placement clearly implies this is of primary importance and is somehow highly definitive of Cypress Park. You think this should be the first thing someone reads if they want information on Cypress Park, and if so, how is that not biased? I do not believe writing about the most awful and sensational event that ever happened in an economically distressed, but gentrifying inner-city neighborhood serves the interests of neutrality, the residents of Cypress Park, or the Wikipedia community.

Cypress Park is a 100 year-old neighborhood of over 15,000 residents and should not be defined in Wikipedia by a small handful of violent incidents...And as you can see by other people repeatedly deleting your posts, I am not alone in my views. Hurleyvillain (talk) 17:34 8 May 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurleyvillain (talk • contribs) 00:47, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		100,000 Edits
		I, Bugboy52.4, award you for reaching 100,000 edits according to the List of Wikipedians by number of edits generated 11:45 pm, 24 February 2009. Keep up the good work!________________________________________________________________

Thanks for saying thanks, and sorry it took me a second to reply. Bugboy52.4 (talk) 03:02, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

omgzerz help this page out http://furry.wikia.com/wiki/Rocko%27s_Modern_Life if you already knew then nvm this ok —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.124.9.20 (talk) 06:23, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WhisperToMe. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Japan.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LDS-SPA1000 (talk) 19:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WhisperToMe. You have new messages at 72.70.68.39's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

For some unknown reason, the WP Japan template does not display the Tokyo task force template. Could you please fix this. The article is Talk:Tokyo Japan Temple. Thanks. LDS-SPA1000 (talk) 22:03, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Do you know anything about comics? Boom! Studios? Mike Kazaleh, Edwin Aguilar? Ucla90024 (talk) 04:47, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• I met them and took pictures of them, including Michael J Fox, Hip Hop Harry, KTLA-TV news anchors, Bullseye(Target mascot), etc. Will decide which ones to post. Ucla90024 (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to copy edit your article, and have a question about content. In the introductory section you state: "After its transition, Gulfton gained…" but the reader does not know what transition is meant. Can you give a clue? (E.g., "after its transition around 19xx from xx to xx" ... or whatever). Best regards, --Remotelysensed (talk) 15:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know that now, but thanks for responding. I have added the templates. LDS-SPA1000 (talk) 17:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the street address again of the Atlanta Store Support Center. You seem to feel strongly about stating that it is outside of Atlanta's political boundaries, which is fine, but the address is a bit much - especially in the second sentence to the article. I'm sure someone researching The Home Depot isn't interested in actual street addresses. Perhaps it belongs elsewhere in the article. Don't you think? -Sme3 (talk) 01:59, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• New photo posted for Cathedral High School (Los Angeles, California). The top is the Dodger Stadium. Ucla90024 (talk) 06:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:LawrenceFobesKing.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 16:50, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Consulate-General of the United Kingdom in Houston, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consulate-General of the United Kingdom in Houston. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.

A tag has been placed on Juju (singer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 23:10, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Karina Urazlina. Since you had some involvement with the Karina Urazlina redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). MilborneOne (talk) 18:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC) MilborneOne (talk) 18:18, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Koji Aihara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Extremepro (talk) 09:56, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• New article started for High School for the Visual and Performing Arts. Ucla90024 (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Libro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Scheinwerfermann (talk) 19:04, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your info, went for a walk at lunchtime today and have uploaded the results to Virgin Atlantic. Also took some pictures of the old XL Airways building which is on the same road. MilborneOne (talk) 18:40, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In common usage, Honolulu, Hawaii is taken to mean the urban area along the southeastern shore of Oahu, approximately from east of Pearl Harbor to the general vicinity of Koko Head; what you're calling Honolulu CDP. Note that article is a redirect to Honolulu, and states right in that article's second sentence that the word refers to the area on the southeastern shore. While it is true that the City & County of Honolulu does encompass the entire island, the term is generally never used that way. "Oahu" refers to the entire island. The post office only uses the southeastern area for what it refers to as "Honolulu", other parts of the island have their own names. For example, the mailing address for Pearlridge Center in the area north of Pearl Harbor is Aiea, Hawaii [1], and when locals would refer to the location of Pearlridge, they'd say "Aiea", not "Honolulu". The term "Honolulu CDP" is not in common use (in fact, I can't recall hearing anyone refer to anything as a CDP outside of Wikipedia), and I feel it is sufficient to refer to the location of Hawaiian Airlines' headquarters as "Honolulu, Hawaii". If the airline were headquartered on another part of the island (say, Kaneohe, Hawaii), then it would be listed as such. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 16:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The government organization is "City and County of Honolulu", not "Honolulu City and County". Honolulu is indeed used to refer to the municipal/county government (for example, Honolulu Police Department covers the entire island, and there is just one mayor and one city council), but when referring to physical location it only refers to the CDP. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted a lot of the content of Mililani High School because it is unreferenced. I personally know nothing of the school, but you could just use the citations tags and request for it to be further referenced. ^suzumebachi٭_secret 19:06, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, okay. If that's the case, I doubt that that page will get any further, considering that no one that has expanded that page is anything further than an IP address... ^suzumebachi٭_secret 19:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Silva.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The idea of "management districts" sounded to me to be something on the level of school districts. We don't list school districts here; is this some sort of minor civil division? MCDs always get listed, even in the rare cases that they're within cities — see all the townships of {{Marion County, Indiana}} for an example. However, for the sake of consistency with other county templates, we shouldn't list other types of government agencies any more than we should list school districts. At any rate, no I didn't realise that they have the authority to levy taxes: you didn't provide a link for such districts, so I had no way to know what they were.

As far as bits outside Houston — I didn't remove East Aldine; it's now in the unincorporated communities section. SB and Gpoint I removed because they have names that indicate Houston neighborhoods. If they're partially outside Houston, they really should be reworked into non-neighborhood articles, because that's what these two look like.

Finally, I'm not sure what you mean by "Harris County, Texas's template needs to function as a "city" template for unincorporated areas." Could you explain? Nyttend (talk) 18:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just wondering what your reason was for moving "Amami Airport" to "Amami-Oshima Airport". The Japanese name is Amami Airport (although it is given incorrectly in the infobox) and moreover three of the four external English links that give a name for the airport refer to it as Amami Airport. "Amami Aiport" also gets many more Google hits than does "Amami-Oshima Airport." So, I'd like to switch it back, but I wanted to check with you first and see if there was some compelling reason not to do so. (And yes, I realize you moved the article more than a year ago, but I've just recently started working on some related articles and I noticed the inconsistency in the article title.) --Shiquasa (talk) 15:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would be willing to take the photo of Air Canada's HQ, except I live nowhere near the airport, and use it relatively infrequently. --MTLskyline (talk) 16:33, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Make Love & Peace, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unnotable manga series. Fails WP:BK and WP:N.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:05, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:JocelyneCoutureNowak.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 01:01, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. —Bkell (talk) 05:33, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is an interesting article that came up in the NYtimes. Wouldn't even begin to know how to incorporate it into the various neighborhoods, but I hope you'd be able to. [2] Let me know if this is useful and I'll follow your lead if I can.--Hourick (talk) 16:30, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear to be of help. I am always coming across news articles, but unfortunately, I have little time for editing other than minor additions or vandalism patrols. If you don't mind, let me know what articles are involved in this so I can keep an eye on them and contribute accordingly. Thanks! --Hourick (talk) 16:58, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Just a quick note, I'll be away for a fortnight from the 2nd of June. If you don't get time to address the points I raised in the review I'm happy to continue to work with you once I return (15th). I don't know if I'll have internet access while I'm away. Parrot of Doom (talk) 20:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, you should however work on the points outstanding, or it may just fail again. Parrot of Doom (talk) 16:46, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See the article's talk page Parrot of Doom (talk) 21:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There were only a few changes made, far less than I'd hoped for by the time I returned from work. It isn't a big deal, but you should work on those points before resubmitting. Don't wait for my responses, as the review has ended I have returned to other articles here. Just work through them yourself, once you're satisfied resubmit to WP:GAN, the next reviewer will no doubt take your work into consideration. Parrot of Doom (talk) 15:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Finally came across a reference for Pico-Union, Los Angeles, California that spells out the origin of the name. See latest update. Ucla90024 (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice you removed an entire list of notable folks from the Great Barrington entry. I can't speak to the entire list, but I can speak to the entry I added for a financier who built a well-known home there, and who was well-documented in that entry for living in Great Barrington. What, may I ask, was the rationale behind your actions? Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 05:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The subject of my entry on that list, banker David Leavitt, is cited in this New York Times article as living in Great Barrington [3]. as well as this New York Times article also. [4] He, at least, needs to be restored as a resident of the town. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 06:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have instead added him to the main text in history as Leavitt built one of the town's earliest estates, and was followed by his sons, who built their own estates nearby. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 15:04, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for letting me know about that. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 16:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that I added that project to the page was that they flew to the Cape. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I hear you're good at cartoon articles. Want to help me with Invader Zim this time? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Good. Just don't ask me to do Zim's laugh, my voice doesn't go that high. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Okay, I made a couple grammar fixes and removed some stupidity. Any suggestions as to what else needs improvement? I think that the plot section could use more sources (mainly in the form of quotes from the episodes, maybe some stuff from the DVD commentary). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:33, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm tempted to say that the buzzyworld site isn't reliable (hasn't been updated since 2006, appears to be someone's personal fansite, no evidence of fact checking/verification/rubber piggies/all that good stuff). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Blah. I'm kinda stuck on the article now. None of the sources I've found really add anything that isn't already in the article, but it's clearly not GA class just yet. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• He does have a Twitter, but there's no Zimmy Doom Zim Doomy zoom dim parent night stuff in there. Also, it might be rather expensive to plunk down some money. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 23:59, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that link seems broken. Crum375 (talk) 18:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of fatalities from aviation incidents. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fatalities from aviation incidents. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I want to ask you something. What do you think is most correct to do: to say that there are no more survivors or say that it is yet unknown? See this: 1 and 2. Air France has already said that there are no more survivors, but the searches have not been finished yet. Thanks.--Eduardoferreira (talk) 20:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WhisperToMe. You have new messages at Socrates2008's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Air France counter pic

Yeah Ok I think I know what u mean, if it was the passengers on the flight it would not be acceptable to picture them but as u say its part of the coverage. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sigge365 (talk • contribs) 07:31, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With respect to "Is this acceptable as an external link? The Brazilian Air Force maintains a portal about AF447 here: http://www.fab.mil.br/portal/capa/index.php?page=voo447 - It is entirely in Portuguese. It contains a lot of supporting information regarding the Brazilian Air Force's efforts. Is this an acceptable external link for this article? WhisperToMe (talk) 22:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)" ...I will soon post an affirmative to this and a link for establishing an auto-translation on-the-fly. Language should not be a barrier for ProjectsWikipedia. Newcomer, with <150 edits still learning and I hope this visit was appropriate. The above will be in Archive3 of discussion of Air France 447 where you commented.Patelurology2 (talk) 16:55, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

(Translation link is in AF447 Archival 3)...Language should not be a barrier in Wikipedia; link in the above is hereby duplicated with translation to English which is automatic and on-the-fly. The translation may not be linguistically accurate in usage or contextual meaning. Translation to many other languages is possible/available by following the logic of the link to translation or talk to me.Patelurology2 (talk) 01:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC) Translation Link: The Brazilian Air Force maintains a portal about AF447 (original is in Portuguese)- English translation here ..>[7] the ext link listed as [7] is duplicated in expanded form again here.. [5]

Since this is an important conceptual point about a language not being a barrier, this link system should be in open on the main discussion page and not be just relegated to archive page alone.Patelurology2 (talk) 01:15, 11 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Patelurology2 (talk • contribs) addendum: Need to re-established deleted Auto-Translation link if thought appropriate.

Just a note, WikiProject Southern California is now a task force under California, so if you wish to add the project tag to any articles please use {{WikiProject California}} with |southerncalifornia = yes |southerncalifornia-importance = .-Optigan13 (talk) 15:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: [6], I'm not aware of any attempts at a San Diego project. Right now I'm just trying to see where the various California projects. Hopefully they will get to a good place to a good space where people can get responses/assistance. If not they will be tagged as inactive so people don't get frustrated by a post that doesn't get a response. -Optigan13 (talk) 16:58, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, upon further research, I agree with your changes, but I see no reason why Asia would need to be subdivided - it only has 5 agencies. If anything, Europe ought to be subdivided first, but i don't think that's presently necessary either. --Cybercobra (talk) 19:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, WhisperToMe. You have new messages at Goldman60's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi,

I've been handling your #wikipedia-fr translation request. Unfortunalety, the pt. article is a copyvio, so we'll need a contributor interested by the topic to make some searches.

Meanwhile, I created a stub. --Dereckson (talk) 08:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is TV.com a reliable source? I ask because somebody cited this in 2Pac's article. Please reply below, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You recently removed a ref to Chris' Cunard Page from the article on Braemar (ship), with an edit summary of "can't be used as a source". Could you elaborate as to why the website in question can't be used? As far as I can see it's in keeping with Wikipedia's reliabile source guidelines and could therefore be used as a source (as a side note, the same website is used as a source on numerous other articles on Cunard ships, so if there's a problem with the source then those articles should also be dealt with). — Kjet (talk · contribs) 10:39, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You recently tagged the above article with the {{stub}} template. This is fine and your contributions are appreciated. But in future, to aid in the expansion of this article, please use a more specific stub template from the list here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/List of stubs. Thank you -- Patchy1^(talk) 04:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of China Eastern flight 583, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: China Eastern Flight 583. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:42, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DPL gives free access over web with library card to tons of databases, such as ReferenceUSA and Morningstar (business info) and InfoTrac/Newsbank. Check Obama article on my user subpage for example. Anyway I would like to share this with wikiproject DFW but need help figuring out where to post. I can help trace down CITEs for articles for the DFW project. The dpl provided databases are a great 3rd party source for improving article quality and verifyability. Please reply back on my talk and delete this so I don't have to watch this page. My talk has has only you as visitor :) Spectre9 (talk) 22:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Crum375 (talk) 13:21, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The information is verifiable. The information is in the public Terms of Service for Airliners.Net. I don't know how much more factual you can get. There are hundreds of threads on A.Net, numerous ones (some are locked by A.Net moderators) that if read, will verify the infomation. Dfwaviator (talk) 20:23, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FinlandAIBlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:09, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi-The Outagamie County Regional Airport (and Air Wisconsin) are located in the town of Greenville, Wisconsin. This is mention in the town's website-I therefore made the change.[7] I hope this helps-Thank you-RFD (talk) 00:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments and your kindness-RFD (talk) 11:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! 100,000 edits. Found you in an old (2004) talk about naming Belgian towns. Just wanted to say hi to a real veteran. --Buster7 (talk) 12:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Please write something on this (L.A's mayor getting schooled) on the mayor's and LAUSD's articles. Ucla90024 (talk) 16:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. Maybe better explanation of the "Partnership for Los Angeles Schools" program is needed. Also shouldn't the program be mentioned in the LAUSD article under "Assembly Bill 1381" since the program was setup after the bill was ruled unconstitutional. Ucla90024 (talk) 02:49, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Here is the mayor's press release when the program was announced year and half ago. PARENTS AND TEACHERS VOTE FOR CHANGE, SAY “YES” TO JOINING MAYOR VILLARAIGOSA’S PARTNERSHIP FOR LA SCHOOLS Ucla90024 (talk) 19:48, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay, i'll try to get it done as soon as possible i just need a permission from security guards.  A M M A R  18:27, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its some kind of useless aviation security, today the national guard handle the security of the building together with the company security staff, don't worry i'll see what we can do .  A M M A R  22:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I could do that for you. The best angle, in my opinion is from the south. It showcases the CR Smith Aviation Museum, which has a glass front, with a roof in the shape of an aircraft wing. Behind the glass is a mint condition DC-3. I am by that way frequently. I will gladly shoot you a picture. You can email me at dfw.embalmer@gmail.com and let me know exactly what you are looking for. One of the funeral homes that I embalm for is right around the way from AA. My mom's brother retired from AA with 35 years in Tulsa at the maintenance base. Dfwaviator (talk) 23:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a major contributor to Lupin III, I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article currently fails the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:Lupin III/GA1. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 02:13, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• We should mention about the only mansion, Pyrenees Castle, is located in the City. It is Phil Spector's residence and where the muder took place. The castle is hidden by tall tree and I can't get a good picture. I only can get a picture at the gate. It was built by the developer when the city was formed. The tallest building is the headquarters building of the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works, which also should be mentioned. The glass building was the former western headquarters building of Sears, Roebuck and Company which included an adjacent retail store, now a Toys R Us store. You can see the castle if you go to Google maps. Ucla90024 (talk) 03:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I only got a piece of the castle or just the gate. News media had shown the gate and a shot from the air. Funny I was at the Alhambra city hall/police station that evening when he was arrested. News media were all there at the front waiting. I waited for a while and got tired and left. Ucla90024 (talk) 22:01, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Also the gate said "high voltage". If you look at Google map, you'll see that at the gate, there's a long, long stairway to the mansion. The top gate can see part of the guest house, which is next to the water storage concrete tank. Ucla90024 (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• The tallest building in Alhambra is the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works HQ building; Not sure if it can be seem from the top floor, like the 12th floor. The DPW building photo was taken from the lower gate of the castle. Ucla90024 (talk) 07:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

in response to photo request for Delta headquarters...this would be very easy for me to do. I've been a little confused as to the wikipedia rules on photos and such. anything I should keep in mind? Deelzbub —Preceding undated comment added 16:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for your cleanup work on that ... I wrote that one back when we weren't as strict about sourcing as we are now, and before WP:NOVEL existed and it was unclear what form these articles were supposed to take (and how much of our own unsourced analysis we could make). It's stayed on my watchlist since then, but I just haven't had the time to bring it into compliance with our current standards. Daniel Case (talk) 06:48, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Whisper, would you mind looking at this discussion and commenting? Thanks, Crum375 (talk) 23:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. You may also want to read this talk page where I explain my rationale. Crum375 (talk) 00:10, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Map of Illinois highlighting Chicagoland.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Papa November (talk) 23:49, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Whisper, thanks for your help. On another topic, would you mind changing the color of that navbox to the same light blue as {{Mayday NavBox}}? I find the orange a bit too distracting. Thanks, Crum375 (talk) 04:32, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I'll fix it, and if he or someone else don't like it, I can add a color parameter to it, so that each editor can select their own color. But the best solution IMO is to have all these navboxes have the same quiet, non-distracting color. Crum375 (talk) 04:43, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed a couple, but unfortunately they are done improperly, so each year has to be changed individually. The correct design should be to have only the specific annual data in each template, all going to a generic annual template with the common style differences from the main navbar template. This can still be done, and I can do it myself, but it's a lot of work and I prefer to have consensus on it first. Crum375 (talk) 04:59, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if they want me to, I can do it myself. I can make the main generic template, and then a couple of example years using it. But I'd like to get their OK before starting. Crum375 (talk) 05:04, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did 1999, 2000 and 2001 as examples, using a new generic template, and they seem OK to me. As you can see, this way all the template details are controlled in one place, while the annual versions just have the specifics for that year. Crum375 (talk) 07:00, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I see that you have expanded the project that I have created last days and I'm so happy for this. You are the best! Happy editing! TouLouse (talk) 16:52, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice templates! Just one slight problem - using bold to denote over 50 deaths also means that the article being viewed appears in bold. That article does not necessarily have 50+ deaths. What about using bold italics instead? Mjroots (talk) 18:46, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget to add an edit summary (see WP:ES) as it helps other editors assess what has been done to the article. Mjroots (talk) 18:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's good, just takes a bit of getting used to until it becomes second nature. Something like add template is fine. Mjroots (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:BronsonCuttingStatueSantaFeNM.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 21:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:AngelicoChavezStatueSantaFeNM.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Polly (Parrot) 21:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]