User talk:Virenderthind2019

Manimajra was renamed as sector 13 legally by UT government of Chandigarh in January 2020 and by February 2020 the new name was finally declared to be written everywhere on papers. Below are links to the decision:- 1). https://m.timesofindia.com/city/chandigarh/manimajra-to-be-renamed-sector-13-residents-elated/amp_articleshow/73114749.cms .

2). https://www.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/chandigarh-s-manimajra-is-now-sector-13/story-ploFPCA4UGpDu9ksUxLtdL.html

Being a Indian resident, i would like to contribute to this new law which was passed by our government .

It is true that the proposal had been initially opposed in december 2019. In the initial proposal, names like Sector M or Sector 26 east were proposed. Here is the link for initial proposals made :-

3)https://m.hindustantimes.com/chandigarh/manimajra-rwa-wants-number-not-m-after-sector/story-Q7ZPsdh5y120cEqlVAKuhP_amp.html

4)https://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-chandigarh-to-finally-get-sector-13-after-54-years-of-formation-2813378

 (these articles were published in newspapers in 2019 which is old).

5)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/archive/chandigarh/mani-majra-to-be-sector-m-863728 (This link i provided over here was published in Tribune India in November 2019 )

But soon the final decision was made which overruled the previous proposals and finally the new name for manimajra was concluded as sector 13 by the beginning of 2020. The next link (6th Link) was also published in Tribune India with the final decision which was declared in February 2020 :-

6)https://m.tribuneindia.com/news/chandigarh/its-official-mani-majra-is-sector-13-of-chandigarh-39042

Please help me by putting your vote in the panel discussion on the talk page section of Sector 13.

Here is an example on how to put your vote ___________.

• Support
• Strong Support
• Agreed

Click on the edit tab and please copy any 1 vote you want to put from the above or you can put you vote by putting a * star symbol followed by 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' and then writing your word for vote like support, agreed etc and finally closing it with again 3 apostrophe marks ' ' ' in the end.

Hello, Virenderthind2019, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rickyurs (talk) 15:42, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Alok Pandey (film actor).

User:TomCat4680 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

All sources need to be in English

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TomCat4680}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 11:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TomCat4680: Dear Sir, I have also added some references in English and have to add in Hindi because there are mostly hindi language sites in India. Because most of the articles are printed here in Hindi. But Overall I have searched about this actor He is noted actor in india. Thnks Sir Virenderthind2019 (talk) 11:35, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Game of Votes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet WP:NBOOK. There is just one good source among the 11 in the article...

• the book's publisher - not independent
• Amazon.com - it's a retail opportunity, not independent
• Google Books - firstly it does nothing to show notability, they list everything, and secondly it's already accessible through the ISBN links in the infobox
• Curious Reader - WP:UGC with a retail link
• Indiatimes.com - once I'd archived it (they don't like Europeans reading their stuff it seems - GDPR) it was just a rehash of the dust jacket blurb - it's pretty damning if the reviewer hasn't got past the dust jacket and the foreword.
• ptinews.com is a good source, so good that outlookindia.com, and deccanherald.com copied it word-for-word. That's one source, not three.
• sentinelassam.com quotes the author and provides less than 50 words of their own. That's not an in depth review, or anything approaching it.
• A twitter post by the author's friend - WP:UGC.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:Pigsonthewing, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Cabayi (talk) 15:04, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabayi: Hllo sir, Help me to improve this article. How can we improve?

( Virenderthind2019 (talk) 15:42, 15 October 2019 (UTC) )[reply]

Add a reliable, verifiable, independent source which isn't trivial, nor an advert, and which is significant. There's one already, just one more will satisfy the requirements of WP:NBOOK.

You don't need brackets around your signature. The template explaining signatures is a bit misleading there. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 15:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Virenderthind2019. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Virenderthind2019. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Virenderthind2019|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Jklamo (talk) 16:35, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jklamo: Dear Sir,I have Interested to edit or create page on wikipedia. I feels good to do it. That is at all,there is nothing like paid.And I am new on wikipedia,that is why i am asking for help from seniors wiki editor.

@Cabayi: Sir, i have added some references to article.please take a look. And please explain me how to know that which source is reliable, verifiable, independent or not.

None of them meet any of the requirements for reliable, verifiable, independent sources.

• literatefrog.co.in immediately takes me to a different story, "Indian Air Force appoints Air Marshal Rakesh Kumar Singh Bhadauria"
• mynation.com is yet another reprint of the PTI article
• bokus.com is yet another book sales site
• idiscover.lib.cam.ac.uk is another listing which says nothing about the book - they list every book without any critical judgement
• ompublications.in is yet another book sales site

You've stopped signing your posts again. -- Cabayi (talk) 19:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:The Game of Votes.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:The Game of Votes.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 08:45, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Kerry Raymond. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Electoral district of Logan have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Kerry (talk) 05:01, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ninja (singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ninja (singer) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 13:16, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jobanpreet Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jobanpreet Singh. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 14:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nalneesh Neel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bisalpur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aakanksha Sareen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakanksha Sareen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Antila ✉ 06:02, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mitti: Virasat Babbaran Di has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non-notable film with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Current sources are mostly about Hema Malini producing the film. It was released in August 2019 and I'm not seeing any review per WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS ^💬 08:13, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jagga Jiunda E has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A non-notable film with no significant coverage in reliable sources. Current sources are announcements and none support the notability. It was released in August 2018 and I'm not seeing any review per WP:NFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS ^💬 08:15, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Dulla Vaily has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying either WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Notable cast members do not generally grant notability. What is missing is critical reviews and press coverage that discuss the film not cast members.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS ^💬 08:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Virenderthind2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bloggers Alliance".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Majash2020 (talk) 06:23, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mitti: Virasat Babbaran Di is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mitti: Virasat Babbaran Di until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS ^💬 04:15, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western Penduz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Penduz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 18:39, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Virenderthind2019

Thank you for creating PTC Punjabi Music Awards.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I think that wp:notability is borderline and perhaps it should be merged with the PTC Punjab article. But I marked it as reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 02:58, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sonpreet Jawanda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appear to have played some minor supporting roles in major productions. Almost all the current sources are name checks and I'm not seeing significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG and looks like WP:TOOSOON.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS ^💬 05:07, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonpreet Jawanda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonpreet Jawanda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS ^💬 06:52, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have an undisclosed financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

• Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
• State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
• Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future. MER-C 15:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Virenderthind2019 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Firstly, I want to say that I have cleared many times that I did mistakes in starting because i didn't know terms&conditions. Second thing, I haven't received any payment from anyone and there is nothing like Undisclosed paid editing. Most important thing is I dont know who is Shamimanm. If I created articles in film and theatre area then It means I sockpuppet of Shamimanm??? If my Surname is Thind then I have connection with Hira Thind??? If I created Alok Pandey and Added a link to Shahjahanpur because He belongs to Shahjahanpur..then I am Sockpuppet of Shamimanm???? Wow, GSS tried many times to find excuses but he failed everytime..but this time he find an other excuse that I have similar Surname to Hira Thind. I simply want to say I haven't any Connection to Shamimanm or Hira Thind. I create articles in my free time and I am not involved in Undisclosed paid editing. If my style of editing looks promotional, I will take care from here. I always try to create notable articles. I request you to unblock me.All the allegations against me are baseless. Thank YouVirenderthind2019 (talk) 11:03 pm, 19 July 2020, Sunday (28 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Decline based on the SPI and the total volume of deleted articles in your history. The fact that you're creating so many articles that do not meet our notability standards shows that you don't understand them and show that there is too much suspicion about undisclosed paid editing for me to comfortably unblock. only (talk) 19:52, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There was a paid editing disclosure request back in December 2019, but no word. scope_creep^Talk 20:59, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have created many good articles. And I am not involved in UPE. I can just request you to unblock.

Virenderthind2019 (talk) 04:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Virenderthind2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Addy Nagar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 07:08, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Virenderthind2019. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lehanga".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:33, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonpreet Jawanda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonpreet Jawanda (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GSS ^💬 17:46, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vicky Badshah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicky Badshah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Aloolkaparatha (talk) 17:24, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shaji Chaudhary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaji Chaudhary until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

IndaneLove (talk) 06:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonpreet Jawanda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonpreet Jawanda (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

IndaneLove (talk) 17:03, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]