User talk:Tarulliah

Hi Tarulliah! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! TylerBurden (talk) 02:03, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! ~Tallulah (talk) 02:06, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Norwegian Cheeses: The story behind them has first person narration, rhetorical questions, and a LOT of content not supported by references. You can work to improve it while waiting for a reviewer, butas is, expect it to be Declined, if not Rejected. David notMD (talk) 04:40, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok. thanks for the warning. ~Tallulah (talk) 04:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added more citations. IF it is still a draft tomorrow I'll try to find more. ~Tallulah (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Official websites and manifestos don't prove notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Norwegian Cheeses: The story behind them and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tarulliah! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 05:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. it is a little. I spent hours trying to find citations. ~Tallulah (talk) 05:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Norwegian Cheeses: The story behind them requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://artsandculture.google.com/story/5AVBwaq3PhEA8A. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 15:52, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Norwegian Cheeses: The story behind them requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 20:13, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The page Draft:Norwegian Cheeses: The story behind them has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 20:25, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Neopets, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

it is not due to research it is due to experience but ok ~Tallulah (talk) 22:35, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you click the link provided you will see that it covers precisely that (i.e. personal experience).-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Personal experience is not a reliable source. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:39, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get how but ok ~Tallulah (talk) 22:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to put this in the simplest terms possible: you can't add content to wikipedia that you personally experienced without having a reliable source to back you up. Hope that helps. Philipnelson99 (talk) 22:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok ~Tallulah (talk) 22:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Cat communication. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Philipnelson99 (talk) 04:36, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...

sorry

XD ~Tallulah (talk) 04:38, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bonadea. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cinnamon roll, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 06:03, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

of course. I knew I was forgetting something! sorry. ~Tallulah (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am having a hard time finding sources, so I think I'll let it lie for now ~Tallulah (talk) 06:10, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cinnamon bun for you!

Hey, don't worry – a good thing about Wikipedia is that mistakes are usually easy to fix. I have the cinnamon bun article in my watchlist (because cinnamon buns!) which is how I saw your edit. It sucks when other people revert edits that you thought were good, but it's something that happens to all of us. As you become more experienced, it will happen less frequently to you! bonadea contributions talk 09:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! I agree, cinnamon buns are awesome. I haven't had one in WAY too long! ~Tallulah (talk) 17:45, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, red links are not the same thing as dead links. The former tell us what articles still are needed, whereas the latter should be updated/corrected. Neither should be removed. Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 13:23, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ahh I see. but how would we do that with the wikipedia pages behind the red links/dead links missing? ~Tallulah (talk) 17:46, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not sure what you mean here. Did you look at the links that I provided, they should explain this in detail. --Randykitty (talk) 21:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, you're not in trouble, but you may want to read the info at WP:GFYE and change some things about your userpage. If you do that, you may also want to delete this comment of mine. Cheers, and welcome to Wikipedia! -- asilvering (talk) 03:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, thank you. ~Tallulah (talk) 04:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Lamlash, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk.

Lamlash being a Scottish village, the article should use British English spelling: "harbour" (not "harbor"), "single storey" (not "single story", "neighbourhood" (not "neighborhood"), etc.

This is not a matter of British or American English, but "i.a." means "among other things" and is different from "i.e." which means "that is"/"in other words", and "saveable" is an acceptable alternative spelling of "savable".

Your edit did improve the article in that it removed a couple of non-neutral expressions. I reverted your edit, but I will remove those words again, and give you credit for spotting them. bonadea contributions talk 16:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]