User talk:Sonic N800

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sonic4321. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Steel1943 (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Sonic, we have been giving you a lot of leeway here. I strongly encourage you to discuss changes and reversions; your actions are becoming disruptive and will result in a block if you continue to use popup reversions on good faith edits with clear edit summaries. Dekimasuよ! 02:39, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Level-5 (video game company). Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dekimasuよ! 02:41, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if you could please explain why you removed Rcats in Special:Diff/638419850. It is a redirect to a section, so I think that should be included. The character one may be debatable, as it is a title. The unprintworthyness may be debatable, as well, but there are probably better redirects to include in a printed version. I know these are only shown if you open the collapsed box, but they are still useful. —PC-XT+ 04:09, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You rather seem to be making a habit of this, witness this recent edit, which I'll now revert. I'm assuming good faith, which in this case means that you don't know what you're doing, so please stop doing it! Favonian (talk) 18:37, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windows 8.2. Since you had some involvement with the Windows 8.2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 04:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect マイクロソフト. Since you had some involvement with the マイクロソフト redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 06:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm puzzled by all your edits like this one. Are there not female protagonists in these games? I recall that there are, and you didn't give any edit summaries, so I was confused on this. Any insight? Sergecross73 msg me 12:12, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated this for a retarget to Sonic the Hedgehog only a week ago. Editors agreed and it was retargeted. Can you please explain why you keep changing it back? Adam9007 (talk) 21:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Microsoft 7, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 06:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Outlook.sk. Since you had some involvement with the Outlook.sk redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 02:08, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Goo&gle. Since you had some involvement with the Goo&gle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:03, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, some changes are controversial and should be discussed with other editors before being made. At least one of your edits, such as the one you made to IPhone 5SE, appears to have gone against established consensus and has been reverted. Please check the article's talk page for discussion about this topic with other editors. If you wish, you can open or continue the discussion there to help establish consensus for your edits. Be sure to check the welcome page to learn more about how Wikipedia operates, and feel free to ask any questions. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 17:44, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the Rcat from the redirect Windows NT 6.4? Could you explain how specifically my choice was incorrect in the context of established Wikipedia conventions? Or were you objecting to the process of redirect categorization in general?

I am aware that the current convention is to use {{redr|from former name}}, but removal is not the proper solution to that. --SoledadKabocha (talk) 04:30, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Calculator.exe, Sonic N800!

Wikipedia editor Pianoman320 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for creating this redirect!

To reply, leave a comment on Pianoman320's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hey, you and @Adam9007: seem to be engaged in an edit war over at Sonic & Knuckles. Please stop and discuss this. Continual reversions may result in a block. Airplaneman ✈ 12:11, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no actual version of Internet Explorer after Internet Explorer 11, so this should not be the target for Internet Explorer 12. Therefore, I have restored the target of Microsoft Edge, the same target that I used when I have originally recreated this redirect after expiration of creation protection due to previous deletions. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 21:35, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect アップル. Since you had some involvement with the アップル redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 07:18, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pg up. Since you had some involvement with the Pg up redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 05:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Home of Fandom. Since you had some involvement with the The Home of Fandom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 05:32, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Windows NT 6.x (disambiguation), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. David.moreno72 16:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. David.moreno72 10:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. David.moreno72 12:59, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no point that I can see in having a page called Minecraft (disambiguation) that only contains a redirect to Minecraft. No-one is going to type that disam bit in, and the Minecraft link will come up in the search bar before they even finish the first word. If you have a very good reason why it should exist, let's have it. Otherwise, it's deletable as an implausible redirect or as a disam page containing only one entry. If you have other things that could be valid parts of a disam page, put them in. But we can't have a title placeholder in the meantime. Peridon (talk) 13:31, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect دورايمون. Since you had some involvement with the دورايمون redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 09:19, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Youtube-nocookie.com. Since you had some involvement with the Youtube-nocookie.com redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:54, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 必应. Since you had some involvement with the 必应 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SSTflyer 15:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Goooooooooogle. Since you had some involvement with the Goooooooooogle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AsphaltXtreme. Since you had some involvement with the AsphaltXtreme redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SuperMarioRun. Since you had some involvement with the SuperMarioRun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect MARIO RUN. Since you had some involvement with the MARIO RUN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SUPER MARIO RUN. Since you had some involvement with the SUPER MARIO RUN redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Adventuresofsonicthehedgehog. Since you had some involvement with the Adventuresofsonicthehedgehog redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Home of Fandom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Steel1943 (talk) 00:46, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Goooooooooogle, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 08:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sonic, I've deleted this page under the speedy deletion criteria (WP:G4), as it was decided this discussion to delete it. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:31, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 必应, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sonic N800. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:00, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sonic N800 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:15, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supermariorun. Since you had some involvement with the Supermariorun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. RoCo^(talk) 14:20, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect QWERTYUIOPASDFGHJKLZXCVBNM. Since you had some involvement with the QWERTYUIOPASDFGHJKLZXCVBNM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. RoCo^(talk) 01:20, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirects of Google regional domains. Since you had some involvement with the Google regional domains redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. RoCo^(talk) 01:55, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Windows VIII, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Windows VII, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:49, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect بوكيمون. Since you had some involvement with the بوكيمون redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 11:08, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect '' has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 27 §  until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]