User talk:Rhain/2013

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

2013 Queensland floods

Hello Rhain1999.
Saw your comments at Talk:2013 Queensland floods, especially bit about living in the Sunshine Coast. Certainly looks wild-n'wooly from Sydney! Is there any chance that you can (safely!) get any flood pictures for use on Wikipedia? Regards, 220 of ^Borg 06:23, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Hey! Sorry for the (very!) late reply, but unfortunately I couldn't really get any pictures. The flooding wasn't too bad around my property, and I couldn't really get transport to the areas that were flooded badly. Also, I didn't get round to taking any picture of what little flooding happened around my house. Apologies! Rhain1999 (talk) 06:49, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of YouTube personalities, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Psy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited To This Day, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dollars Trilogy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article To This Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To This Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nathan Johnson (talk) 16:47, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Please be informed that Doctor Who TV is not considered a reliable site. It can't therefore be used as a source. 101090ABC (talk) 07:11, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, please see my edit summary in response to your edit. Graham87 15:04, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Please note, edits such as this and this are unnecessary. {{Episode list}} automatically provides anchoring to the "EpisodeNumber" and "ProdCode" felds. To link to "The Shiny Trinket Maneuver", the correct syntax is [[The Big Bang Theory (season 5)#ep99|The Shiny Trinket Maneuver]]. --AussieLegend (✉) 07:36, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

My apologies. I didn't know. Thanks for the tip! :) Rhain1999 (talk) 10:19, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for creating 50th anniversary special (Doctor Who), Rhain1999!

Wikipedia editor FoCuSandLeArN just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

nice article!

To reply, leave a comment on FoCuSandLeArN's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hello, I've cleaned up your talk page header somewhat and fixed the links to the archives. Notably, {{Talk header}} should only be used on article talk pages. Hope you don't mind; I was inspired to do this after checking up on a comment I had previously left on your talk page (which is now in archive 2). Graham87 08:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I don't mind at all. It was starting to annoy me, actually, and I couldn't really work out how to fix it. I'm more into adding information than fixing headers and infoboxes and such. Thank you! :) Rhain1999 (talk) 12:55, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I've started a review of Red Dead Redemption at Talk:Red Dead Redemption/GA1. As noted in my review I'm still thumbing through it, but please do not wait for me, as there are quite a few issues that need to be addressed, and I only give the customary one week to fix issues once I finish my review. Glad to see someone's taking on such a great game. --Teancum (talk) 13:30, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Red Dead Redemption Original Soundtrack.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

50th anniversary special (Doctor Who) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Power of Three

List of voice actors in the Grand Theft Auto series (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Comic Con

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:11, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi there. I see that you've undone my italicising of the New Who episodes. I wasn't aware that this was a specific styling decision; seems odd to me. Where was that agreed? GedUK  11:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Nevermind, I've found it. Well, I've found it in the WHO:MOS, just trying to find the discussion. GedUK  11:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, it's always been like this. The episodes with more than one part, but grouped with the same titles (eg. An Unearthly Child, The End of Time) are in italics. The singular episodes, or even two-parters with separate titles (eg. "Mission to the Unknown", "The Stolen Earth"/"Journey's End") are simply quotation marks. There is no specific distinction of the difference with Classic Who and New Who, with Classic in italics and New in quotations. However, every single Classic Who episode (bar "Mission to the Unknown") was either more than one part, or a film (The Five Doctors, Doctor Who); every single New Who episode (bar The End of Time) have been separate episodes, or with different titles. There's a basic explanation, anyway. :D --Rhain1999 (talk) 11:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I understand it, but on a page like the one I edited, it simply looks stupid; there's a mix between the two, no rationale why some are in italics and others aren't. It just feels like we're unncessarily complicating it to solve a problem that doesn't really exist. As far as Im concerned, each 'story' should be italicised, be that An Unearlthly Child Caves of Androzani or Midnight. Not sure whether there's any point in raising it again, I'll have to look in the archives again to see when it was discussed last. GedUK  11:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

On practically every Doctor Who article (more notably List of Doctor Who serials), the Classic series is in italics and the New series is in "quotation marks", so I personally think it should be kept this way, as it does make more sense. Not only this, but I'm sure the same thing goes for every single television episode. If it's more than one part with the same title, italics. Otherwise, "quotations". --Rhain1999 (talk) 11:46, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

I guess this is just one of those fundamental differences; to me, that same page looks silly with a sudden, unexplained change between the two types. GedUK  11:46, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

That's understandable. --Rhain1999 (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Please don't do that. The reviewer is always supposed to handle passing it. They might find something during a final scan of the article. --Teancum (talk) 09:46, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

My apologies. I had a bad feeling about doing it too. :c --Rhain1999 (talk) 11:23, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

No harm done. I actually motivated me to make the fixes I had planned on doing. --Teancum (talk) 21:08, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

I've finished and passed the article. Nice work! --Teancum (talk) 13:07, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much, for all of your help! :) But if the article has passed, shouldn't it have the {{Good article}} template in it, so it has the "plus" sign at the top? --Rhain1999 (talk) 13:43, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liberty City (Grand Theft Auto IV era), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Culver Line (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:59, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Carl Johnson.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Carl Johnson.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Victor Vance.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:42, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Double Screen Internet Extra Large. Since you had some involvement with the Double Screen Internet Extra Large redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). « Ryūkotsusei » 18:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Display Screen Interactive Extra Large. Since you had some involvement with the Display Screen Interactive Extra Large redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). « Ryūkotsusei » 18:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages High definition and 1UP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rhain,

Unfortunately, I've had to keep reverting some of your edits to Grand Theft Auto V, particularly the ones where you add details of the recently-released character trailers. There are several reasons for this, and I thought I'd take this opportunity to explain them to you:

1) They don't actually contribute anything that is not already in the article. Your edits seem mostly concerned with the details of the characters that the trailer reveals, but most of this is already covered in the "Premise" section of the article.

2) They're speculative. You describe Franklin as "seems to be part of a gang", which is you speculating on what the details of the trailer might mean. Since it's not backed up (you're essentially guessing) by a reliable source, it can't be included in the artcile.

3) They're concerned with trivial details. I noticed this when you describe Trevor as seen walking around in his underwear and making a remark on Michael's wife Amanda's breasts. Seriously? He comments on her breasts? Do you really think that's the most important thing to take from this trailer? You wouldn't go into that level of detail in recounting the plot, so why do it for a trailer?

Finally, it's an issue of notability. Just because something exists, that does not mean it is automatically notable enough to be included in an article. This particularly applies to trailers, since without anything to substantiate them, they are essentially advertising, which is not what Wikipedia is for.

If you think there is a case for including the third trailer in the article, then feel free to discuss it, either here, on my talk page or - better yet, since everyone will be able to contribute - the article talk page. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 09:40, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

I definitely see the point that you're trying to make here, (thanks for getting it across so nicely too!) and I guess I agree. I mean, even though my edits concerning some of the specifics and speculations of the trailers was fixed in later edits, I guess the trailers in themsleves aren't necessarily important on the main page. However, something that I'm thinking we could do, is similar to the Marketing for Grand Theft Auto IV article, and make a Marketing for Grand Theft Auto V article. Obviously, it's probably way too early to make this now, but when the time comes, I think it could be made and the information could be included on there. In the meantime, I'll start up a "work in progress" page of it here, and when the time comes we might be able to turn it into it's own page. Comprende? Rhain1999 (talk) 10:49, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

P.S. (Doctor Who) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Mark Williams, The Power of Three and Pond Life

Chris Chibnall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pond Life

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for sorting them out didn't realise the MP3 mistake. My brain was in a mess trying to sort out the results of the incorrect moves by the previous user. - X201 (talk) 08:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

No worries. I was browsing through the Max Payne 3 article and decided to see if there was any problems in the talk pages, and I noticed that 'Archive 1' had nothing to do with the game. Then I realised that Max Payne 3 is an acronym for MP3, and heaps of the discussion on the 'Archive 1' page was about audio files for computers, etc. So, of course, I changed it. :-) Rhain1999 (talk) 10:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tobuscus Adventures: Wizards!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Grand Theft Auto V characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gang banger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 16:41, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carl "CJ" Johnson, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Grand Theft Auto and Video game character (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

An Adventure in Space and Time (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Barbara Wright

William Hartnell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Three Doctors

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rhain1999,

I just undid your edit on GTA V, sort of assuming it was vandalism. Seeing your user page and edits, can only assume that your edit wasn't meant to unconstructive. Could you please explain why you felt that the bit had to go? A plot summary of your edits is always useful. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 20:40, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey there Soetermans,

Thanks for contacting me. The reason that I removed those sentences on the GTA V article was because someone else removed them beforehand. I'm at school right now, so I can't look at the history of the article due to a block, but I believe that the editor that removed the sentences was a reliable and skilled editor who I thought would have been doing the right thing by removing it. However, it looks like you assume otherwise, and that's fine. I've just fixed up the horrendous grammar in the sentence, but I believe that the fact may belong in a different section. If so, I'd love for you to contact me again about this. Thanks again (and sorry for the brief reply; I really shouldn't be editing Wikipedia right now! c; ). --Rhain1999 (talk) 04:43, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I'm back at home now, so I just had a look, and I take back what I said about the "reliable and skilled editor" statement. It seems that it's CloudKade11 who removed the sentences, and it seems s/he is an unreliable editor who should not be trusted, due to his/her ban from editing this site indefinitely! Therefore, I'm sorry that I removed the sentence, as I guess it does belong there and should not have been removed. Thank you for contacting me about it, though! Have a good day, and happy editing. :) --Rhain1999 (talk) 06:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rhain1999,

Thanks for your reply. I totally understand your train of thought and have made the same error more than once. Good that CloudKade has been put on a block, apparently s/he has been edit-warring quite a bit. Thanks, and happy editing! --Soetermans. T / C 10:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Soetermans

Thank you for your understanding! I'm also glad that CloudKate is on a block. Anything we can do to improve Wikipedia! :) Thanks again. --Rhain1999 (talk) 11:13, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Template:YouTube personalities has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Otterathome (talk) 13:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I've redirected the article you created at Doctor Who Live: The Next Doctor for now. When the Twelfth Doctor is announced, this information can be incorporated into Twelfth Doctor. Thanks, U-Mos (talk) 14:53, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

I know this might be a bit unusual but thank you for the new image and massive references.

Please continue building up this page. Thank You Very Much, Crazyboy279. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crazyboy279 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

No worries. Thanks for being so kind, but it looks like all of my references have been removed and the image has been deleted. What a shame. Fair enough, though. Guess somebody didn't like it! :s -Rhain1999 (talk) 00:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Twelfth Doctor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. January (talk) 21:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading File:Twelfth Doctor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. LukeSurl ^{t c} 21:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Twelfth Doctor.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

The article Doctor Who Live: The Next Doctor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Although I believe the material on this page was useful, I believe that the page has outlived its purpose. Some of the material that used to be on this page has been transferred to the page Twelfth Doctor. Also, after clicking on the 'What links here' special page, it is evident that this page will very rarely be visited as no other articles or templates link to it.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bestbaggiesfan ✉ 00:01, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

The article Doctor Who Live: The Next Doctor has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

As a regular contributor to Grand Theft Auto (series), I have opened a discussion with another editor that may be of interest to you. - X201 (talk) 08:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't mind if you want to move the reference list in Grand Theft Auto V down to the actual section instead of using citation templates as you go. I don't particularly see the need for it, and I don't really like having to scroll through a long list of references to insert a citation template, so I'm going to use the more commonplace method which is to use citation as you go, and if you want to go ahead and move that into the Reflist manually feel free. I just can't be assed and prefer the traditional system. CR4ZE (talk) 14:46, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

You've made a great point, actually. Maybe I'll just move the long references (like the one about the "highly anticipated") into the reference list instead. I'll come up with a decision later today, and then if I decide to revert my changes, then I will (and keep all of the changes since then. Thanks for your feedback. --Rhain1999 (talk) 01:33, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rhain, it looks like you are a very experienced editor about the GTA Series, I would appreciate if you could join us at the GTA Wiki, where you can feel free editing in a Wiki specialized in the GTA Series. In the Wiki I'm an user called Thomas0802. Thanks and I hope you accept this invite! 80.201.35.38 (talk) 21:45, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey there, thanks for your invite! Calling me a "very experienced editor" is very nice of you! As for joining you at the GTA Wiki, well I've been editing that Wiki every so often on my account whenever I see little mistakes, and I'd be happy to help over there! Wikipedia is still my home, so it's in my best efforts to continue improving the Grand Theft Auto articles over here a lot too, but I'd definitely be happy to help! --Rhain1999 (talk) 22:57, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

I reverted your edit back to the earlier revision at Grand Theft Auto V. I know that "GTA V" is an official abbreviation, but the correct way to write an article according to the MoS is to refer back to the full title unless it's excessively long. As such, the full "Grand Theft Auto V" name should be used throughout the article. The only exception to this should be direct quotes from third-party sources who refer to it as "GTA V". I should also point out that including the (insert) in the opening line of the lead section breaks the flow of the sentence which is something you should only do if absolutely necessary, like if you're introducing the birth name of a musician who uses a stage pseudonym.

I'm open to hear your thoughts. I don't want to have an edit war over something trivial. We can debate this at the talk page entry if you wish. CR4ZE (talk) 15:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry about my constant troubles on that page lately, I just try and do the right thing and it normally turns out being pretty bad, and I'm sorry about that. I'm normally a pretty constructive editor. As for the removal of the abbreviation, I can understand that it's been removed, and I apologise for adding it back in again. I appreciate your urge to keep the article to Wikipedia's standards, and writing "Grand Theft Auto V" instead of "GTA V" is definitely a perfect example of that. Again, I apologise for my mistakes, and thank you for your continued efforts to improve the article. Feel free to contact me here if you need any help concerning any articles (particularly Grand Theft Auto ones. --Rhain1999 (talk) 22:53, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

You've got nothing to be sorry for. Truly. I wouldn't say that your edits were pretty bad, and I encourage you to keep making edits. It's just in this instance I though the article would work better without the abbreviation. I absolutely encourage you to continue improving the article. CR4ZE (talk) 07:46, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello Rhain1999. While you say I did not provide any reason to revert edits which I actually never did since I made the edits myself without actually reverting that of anyone. Also please carefully read what I am about to say. Under the References section there is a source or link to a Q & A on the Rockstar Games Website. In this Q & A session it is stated in answer that the fictional universe of the games are related to their graphics. So GTA 1 and GTA 2 share the same universe. GTA 4 and GTA 5 share the sane universe. It might be hard to find it but if you go through the Q & A session you will find it. However the universes do not actually have any official names. 2D/3D/HD universe are all fan made names.

Also here's the link to the source ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Grand_Theft_Auto_chronology ).

Here's the text from the source which proves existence of the shared universes based on graphics. El Burro is referenced as he was also referenced in GTA 1, so it felt appropriate that he should cross “universes” – the “universes” are the worlds interpreted at different definitions, 2d, 3d and high definition, so we felt brands and radio / back ground characters would exist in both, but 3 dimensional characters would not. This is the logic (as far as it could be considered logical) behind it – so no, we don’t believe any GTA3 characters could exist in the GTA4 universe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lar409 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey there, I know about the different universes of the Grand Theft Auto series, and how they're not related in major ways. However, I decided to revert your edits because another editor had previously reverted my edits when I changed it back to show the different universes. As a matter of fact, that editor was you. I appreciate that you want to show the universes, and I won't try and stop you any further, but I just wanted you to know my reason. Thank you. --Rhain1999 (talk) 22:11, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of countries by refugee population may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {rank order}} <!-- Do we really need this? I don't know what it's trying to say should be done. Please contact me.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:34, 2 September 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rob Wiethoff may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ''Red Dead Redemption'' || [[Spike Video Game Awards]] || Best Performance by a Human Male <small>(as [[John Marston (Red Dead Redemption)|John Marston]] || {{nom}} || <ref>{{cite web |url=http://

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:08, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rob Wiethoff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Wiethoff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Caffeyw (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Once we have the Plot up, the Premise section could probably just go. All it really does it tell us about the background of the characters, and that can just go at the Characters article. What do you think? CR4ZE (talk) 11:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, I think that's a good idea. As a matter of fact, I think most of what's written in the Premise section is in the lead of the Characters article, anyway. But, yeah, the Premise will be pointless once the Plot is there.

Speaking of the Plot, I know it's obvious, but if you're playing the story of the game, I'd definitely recommend not even looking at it (even though it's invisible) if you don't want to spoil the game for myself. That's a reason that I'm not going to be editing that article much over the next few days: I don't want to spoil any of the game for myself. I hope you can understand that; I'd understand if you'd want to do it too. Thanks, Rhain1999 (talk) 11:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for helping with the Reception section. If you go over to my sandbox, I've started collating some reviews which you might like to use. Even though I've only gone through 6 so far, you can begin to see some familiar points the reviewers note as strengths and weaknesses. Could be handy as you're writing. CR4ZE (t) 15:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

• Try to reinterpret quotes in your own words as much as possible. CR4ZE (t) 15:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Wow, you're doing a great job in your sandbox! The amount of effort that you're putting into this is pretty crazy, and I'm proud to be working on it as well. I'm about to head off to sleep, but I'll definitely get to work on editing the Reception section, using your sandbox, when I wake up. (that is, of course, if you don't finish the section yourself.) Again, thanks for your continued efforts to improve this article (not to mention your brilliant work on your GA review for GTA IV!). Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 15:30, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grand Theft Auto IV may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• title=GTAIV Dated for Japan|last=Ashcraft|first=Brian |date=15 August 2008|publisher= [[Kotaku]]]|accessdate=7 November 2008}}</ref> A [[Microsoft Windows]] version of the game was released in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:16, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Grand Theft Auto IV may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• } '''[[Sam Houser]]''': "He's from that gray part of broken-down Eastern Europe, a war-torn area." }}</ref> arrives to meet his cousin [[List of Grand Theft Auto IV characters#Roman Bellic|Roman]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:56, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Frank Tenpenny may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• re a family member of Officer Pendelbury whom [C.R.A.S.H.] shot when he threatened to expose them".}}</ref> Tenpenny also forms an alliance with ''The Ballas'' and he convinces Big Smoke to betray the
• never understood what I did! Fifty of me and this town would be OK. I took the trash out! I DID!"}}</ref> Dying from his injuries, CJ and the rest of his crew examine the body, and CJ moves in with

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Theft Auto V, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi,Have you played GTA 5 yet.Could you please tell me the release date of pc version of the game.Thanx---zeeyanwiki ^discutez 08:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey there! Yes, I have played Grand Theft Auto V, on Xbox 360, and I love it! I've finished the story and my goal now is to get 100% before Grand Theft Auto Online launches. As for a PC release? Currently, Rockstar haven't even confirmed that they're going to release it for PC, therefore a release date has not been confirmed either, however there are many rumours spreading across the Internet saying that they might confirm a PC version soon. Most of these probably aren't true, though. To stay updated on whether the game will release on PC, you can regularly check up on Rockstar Newswire, where they post all of their news, or the Grand Theft Auto V Wikipedia article, which we make sure to update very regularly on any big news about the game. Thanks! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 08:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC).

Hey!,actually i have no X-box or PS3 available.I am really fond of the series.Just asking so i update my Pc as per requirements which would be too high as per graphics of the game.Thnx a lot---zeeyanwiki ^discutez 22:35, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Okay, fair enough. If the game is confirmed for PC, we'll be sure to add the system requirements to the Wikipedia article as soon as we hear of them, so you can check on there if need be. Thanks again! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 23:58, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

I finished collating reviews on my sandbox if you want to keep going with the Reception section. I'm pretty busy but I'll get writing some time soon anyway. CR4ZE (t) 04:37, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

I've been trying to come up with some more paragraphs to put in the section, but it's proving harder than I thought it would. I'm just doing small edits for now, but hopefully I can come up with some bigger ideas soon. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 05:51, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vice City, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 14:39, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 11:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of most viewed YouTube videos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rhain, I'm JD3rulo, a big fan of Jessie J, so I was wondering if you could spend your free time in helping me to update Jessie's page, I mean, if you could find reliable sources whose content is about her vocal range and type of voice, and you could include it in her page, I'd be very thankful. If u need some help for editing or creating an article, u can count on me, just let me a note in my talk page. I hope you can help me, bro. Have a nice day!JD3rulo (talk) 04:54, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Steven Ogg may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• web |url=http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2103188/fullcredits?ref_=tt_ql_1 |title=Grand Theft Auto V (Video Game (2013) |author=[[Internet Movie Database]] |publisher=[[Amazon.com|Amazon]] |accessdate=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:38, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

You're being a child. Just go to the talk page and discuss why you feel screen time trumps order of Doctor regeneration. Thank you :). Rusted AutoParts 06:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

That first sentence is slight breaching of WP:NPA. I'd watch it. I may be acting stubborn, but that doesn't give you reason to say that I'm "being a child". -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 06:18, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Um, because I requested you go to the talk page twice and you chose to continue reverting? Maybe that's why? Rusted AutoParts 06:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry for not complying, but as stubborn as I might be acting, that gives you absolutely zero reason to breach WP:NPA. Sorry and thank you. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 06:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited An Adventure in Space and Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Bradley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey Rhain1999, I just came across your name in "recent changes" and remembered that you and I had some minor disagreements when you started out as an editor. I'm really glad to see that you're still around and contributing. Keep up the good work!

bonadea contributions talk 17:29, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey Bonadea, thanks for the very kind message! I'm sorry that we had some disagreements a while back, but that seemed to happen pretty regularly with other editors and I, unfortunately. Thankfully, I only have the occasional problem now, and all runs pretty smoothly. I see you still edit regularly, so you keep up the good work too! Happy editing! -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 20:31, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VGX (award show), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Won't Back Down (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

I opened up a discussion about getting this thing done quicker. Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations#GA review of Grand Theft Auto V. CR4ZE (t) 03:37, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Good Game: Pocket Edition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Game: Pocket Edition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Samwalton9 (talk) 13:53, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
179		Endurance racing (motorsport) (talk)	Add sources
68		My Kitchen Rules NZ (talk)	Add sources
112		Way of the Warrior (video game) (talk)	Add sources
146		Grand Theft Auto III soundtrack (talk)	Add sources
566		Hot Coffee mod (talk)	Add sources
26		Nancy Leveson (talk)	Add sources
1,975		Christopher Jackson (actor) (talk)	Cleanup
439		Wolfenstein (2009 video game) (talk)	Cleanup
54		East Asian studies (talk)	Cleanup
2,167		Clara Oswald (talk)	Expand
1,284		Television program (talk)	Expand
38		Ángela Torres (talk)	Expand
3,569		The Doctor (Doctor Who) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
220		Human Nature (Doctor Who) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
14		Timeline of Internet conflicts (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
63		History of the Time Lords (talk)	Merge
699		Time Lord (talk)	Merge
284		Bird's-eye view (talk)	Merge
140		Doctor Who: The Curse of Fatal Death (talk)	Wikify
38		Corrinne Yu (talk)	Wikify
87		Video game localization (talk)	Wikify
6		JustSaying (talk)	Orphan
12		Medical Heritage Library (talk)	Orphan
6		Moo Mapper (talk)	Orphan
92		Euphoria (software) (talk)	Stub
36		Brendan O'Brien (voice actor) (talk)	Stub
248		Ready at Dawn (talk)	Stub
28		Jacked: The Outlaw Story of Grand Theft Auto (talk)	Stub
60		Harrison Browne (talk)	Stub
60		Dream Zone (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:09, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
174		GameTrailers (talk)	Add sources
746		Max Payne (talk)	Add sources
115		Love Stuff (talk)	Add sources
488		Cardiac glycoside (talk)	Add sources
476		Sixth generation of video game consoles (talk)	Add sources
58		Rings of Power (video game) (talk)	Add sources
121		Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences (talk)	Cleanup
107		History of online games (talk)	Cleanup
106		Fuse (video game) (talk)	Cleanup
29		Zeno Clash II (talk)	Expand
3,304		The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt (talk)	Expand
336		The Warriors (video game) (talk)	Expand
321		Robot Unicorn Attack (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
369		Home video game console (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
799		Grand Theft Auto (video game) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,527		Street Fighter (talk)	Merge
20		Video gaming in Finland (talk)	Merge
399		Morgue (talk)	Merge
160		Claude (Grand Theft Auto) (talk)	Wikify
24		GamePolitics.com (talk)	Wikify
222		Dragon's Crown (talk)	Wikify
11		The Trojan Men (talk)	Orphan
3		Actuarial Society of South Africa HIV/AIDS models (talk)	Orphan
7		A Woman in Amber (talk)	Orphan
56		Adult Swim (Canada) (talk)	Stub
44		Keef the Thief (talk)	Stub
39		Rockstar Lincoln (talk)	Stub
197		Battle of Monte Grappa (talk)	Stub
11		The Market for Computer & Video Games (talk)	Stub
78		Andrew House (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:34, 6 May 2017 (UTC)