Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Game: Pocket Edition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Good Game. Courcelles 19:09, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good Game: Pocket Edition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Good Game article (of which this show is a spin-off) already contains as much sourced material as seems to be available, I see no need for a separate article. Propose redirecting to Good Game. Samwalton9 (talk) 13:53, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Samwalton9 (talk) 13:56, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of the article, I'm not going to say whether I feel it should be kept or deleted/redirected, but I just want to say that I definitely see where this nomination is coming from. -- Rhain1999 ^{(talk to me)} 15:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While currently the entry of Good Game: Pocket Edition on the TV show's main page does have the same references and basic amount of information about the show as the current separate page, I oppose its current deletion. The main page contains a summary, but I feel that more information about the show can be added. I plan to work on the article for the next week, and if after this period of time there is a general consensus that it should be redirected, then so be it. If this is to be the case, I would then request that a separate list of episodes section page be made for pocket edition. Although I have created the majority of this section myself, it acts as a handy reference as to the games, consoles and technologies reviewed more so than the site's similar page.Neuroxic (talk) 00:48, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Good Game which is quite comprehensive.Doctorhawkes (talk) 07:25, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Merge anything that isn't already in Good Game to there and then redirect this article. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 10:27, 28 December 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Merge. The show doesn't seem notable enough to require its own article. Gm545 (talk) 14:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Holy crap. Unless these guys have some rabid fans, someone from the show has got to have been writing the Good Game main article. Has anyone been looking into it for WP:COI? Paranoia from the author tends to back that up. It should be fairly easy to identify the TV network's IP addresses if we want to go so far. Gm545 (talk) 14:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.