User talk:Rextron

Hello, Rextron! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Doug.(talk • contribs) 06:38, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi. When you recently edited Kronosaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boyaca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. When you said on the Talk:Monster of Aramberri page that "any currently know pliosaur exceeds 17 m" did you mean that any currently known pliosaur does exceed 17 m, or that no currently known pliosaur exceeds 17 m? Saruman IV (talk) 03:17, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for letting me know. I wouldn't be of much help, since my French is rather limited. It sounds like you know what you're doing. Saruman IV (talk) 15:13, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cramauchenia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chubut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coelodonta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Molar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rextron; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siroccopteryx, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Greek, Muzzle and Anhanguera (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the appreciation! Although you should have given it to Smokeybjb for expanding it ;) Rnnsh (talk) 11:20, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thanks! Also, I see you've done a lot for the paleo articles on the Spanish Wikipedia. Great job! Smokeybjb (talk) 22:28, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Huilatherium, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages ICZN and Diastema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know about that illegal upload.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:38, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patagosmilus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chico River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scaldicetus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enamel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nesodon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''N. taweretus'' (

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm confused why my edit of why the tyrannosaurus specimen "sue" keeps getting undone when she weighs up to 9 tons minimum. I have many plausible and reliable resources. If it's a citing problem please help me with that because i'm unsure how they do it on wikipedia.

That's exactly what I did. I cited the source and i put the exact information from that article into the t-rex article. Also they just changed the largest specimen (sue) length back to 40 when the museum which holds sue confirmed that she is 42 feet long.

I believe i know where i went wrong. I entered my new reference but i never deleted the reference that said that sue weighed 7.5 tons so maybe thats why people think that i'm changing the reference. If you could change the weight and the length of sue where it should be at which are 9 tons and 42 feet in length in would be greatly appreciated. Source which states sue's length: https://www.fieldmuseum.org/happening/exhibits/sue-t-rex Sources for sues weight: http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/tyrannosaurus-rex-weighed-tons-estimate/story?id=14738660

http://www.livescience.com/16524-rex-dinosaur-weighed.html

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Datanglong, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ilium, Pubis and Datang. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Datanglong does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, even if it is very brief, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!
JacobiJonesJr (talk) 08:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The 14-18 m TL figure for C. megalodon in the wiki article is not referred in the corresponding source nor in any published paper. I dont say it's not true, I say that it s not written in the scientific litterature at all. I suggest to use maximum size of 18 m (published in Pimiento 2013), not 14-18 m, which is not a piblished figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Over there (talk • contribs) 07:11, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Well some corrections,

Pimiento 2010 precisely uses "more than 16 m" using as reference Gottfried et al. 1996.

Gottfried et al. 1996 have not estimated a 12 m figure but a conservative max size of 16 m, a max size of 17 m, and hypothetical maximum size of 20.2 m.

Pimiento's figure of 18 m in the 2014 paper is based on her 2013 paper where she collected additionnal C.megalodon specimens from the Gatun Formation, one being estimated at 17.9 m. Using Shimada's method, not Gottfried's.

Hence, I dont understand why the 14 m figure is used here since it does not exist as a precise figure in modern publication about C. megalodon.

It appears then, based on the latest publications that the modern consensus of maximum size is 18 m, not 14-18 m.

None of the modern published methods suggest a maximum size figure of 14 m, nor in litterature, nor while applying them on teeth specimens from private collection.

So parcimony and respect of the published litterature suggests to me to not use that not referenced 14 m figure. Rather the latest by Pimiento.

14 m simply does not exist in the littetature as published figure. And it was very certainly not the maximum size for C. megalodon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Over there (talk • contribs) 01:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regisaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ilium. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Surameryx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coronoid process. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Langstonia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Caudal and Dental. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Langstonia page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paja Formation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anoxic and Eastern Cordillera. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you'd better watch out, you'd better not cry, you'd better not pout, I'm telling you why Christmas Velociraptor is coming to town He sees you when you sleeping, he knows when you're awake, he knows if you've been bad or good, so be good for your life's sake Oh, you'd better watch out, you'd better not cry, you'd better not pout, I'm telling you why Christmas Velociraptor is coming to town Merry Christmas, and watch out for the Christmas Velociraptor, IJReid (talk) 25 December 2014

Hi! It's Gug 01. I noticed that you made many positive edits to the article Homotherium venezuelensis, which I created. I want to thank you for that. Also, in the reference to fossilworks there is information documented in a way I cannot understand. Could you please take that information from the reference and add it to the Wikipedia article? Please do so if you can. Gug01 (talk) 22:46, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

I did see your edit in which you added some information from the Spanish version of the article, and I thank you a lot for that. I appreciate that edit. However, in the fossilwork reference, there is a large paragraph titled "Average measurements (in mm)". That's the information I originally wanted you to put in the article. Of course, that isn't to say I don't appreciate your edits a lot, and I want to thank you again. Gug01 (talk) 22:54, 29 December 2014 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

Just posted my reply here too. I didn't change the time when I posted and I hope you don't mind if I post in multiple places. Gug01 (talk) 16:05, 30 December 2014 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

True. You're right. So then let's just not incorporated information from the ref "fossilworks". Thanks again for your edits and your time on that article. Gug01 (talk) 14:01, 31 December 2014 (UTC) Gug 01[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hilarcotherium

added links pointing to Socket, Convex and Incisive

Panderichthys

added a link pointing to Asterolepis

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maddenia (mammal), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scaglia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muiscasaurus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Boyaca. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Nuciruptor page, your edit caused an archiveurl error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:40, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am thinking of bringing Giganotosaurus to FA, and since you're a Spanish speaker, I was thinking whether you might know of some important sources that would be hard to find and understand for the rest of us? Feel free to contribute, if you're interested. I think I saw you've collaborated with IJReid on translating articles as well. FunkMonk (talk) 12:49, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for that, as it read like a way to show significance without a basis on fact. Regardless, the subject is notable, so thanks for catching that. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:40, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Species names are never capitalized. Please read the article Binomial nomenclature and refrain from creating mistakes such as Timurlengia Euotica. Speciate (talk) 13:41, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For a great help on Proapteryx references, my thanks. I have put some effort into Westergaardodina, but I would like you to take a look at it. Does it really need to be rewritten entirely as the tag says? What is the meaning of ... Is it a form taxon?. (September 2013) in the second tag?--DThomsen8 (talk) 00:53, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eionaletherium, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 13:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rextron. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rextron, I see you are a Spanish speaker. At the moment I am tackling the paleontology articles and main focus is South American fossils. Adding cats, species, refs and images where I can. Still a lot to do, but imho the section needs enhancement and further integration with other articles makes the reading more interesting. What are your experiences and activities? All the best, Tisquesusa (talk) 02:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great! Langstonia is a great article, I've been reading it, but saw now it was classed as "stub" which is ridiculous, so reclassed to B. Congrats on that one. The La Venta Lagerstätte is indeed very interesting and I have an article in preparation (to prepare for that I am doing all those edits), that I will share with you when it's finished, you'll see. For now, if you could throw a critical eye to two articles I have recently added, would be really appreciated. I don't translate from other Wikipedias, am starting from scratch with heavily referenced and complete articles, only using the Spanish wiki as a guideline or access to sources. The two I've added recently are Eastern Hills, Bogotá, which is in the process of FA review, and the Bogotá Formation of which I hope they will publish soon on the various other fossil fauna they've discovered in addition to Etayoa with the Muisca name bacatensis. I really think that Etayo and Villarroel and probably others deserve a page too. I've added Thomas van der Hammen a while ago. Cool to work with you and nice to see there are more Colombian geology/paleontology writers around. Saludos, Tisquesusa (talk) 03:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rextron, in the past month I've added some articles which may be interesting for you to read/review/check out:

1. Floresta Formation
2. Sabana Formation
3. Soatá Formation
4. Valle Alto Formation
5. Arcabuco Formation
6. Colombitherium
7. Honda Group

Let me know what you think. Cheers, Tisquesusa (talk) 20:34, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magnamanus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iliac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rextron. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rextron. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences.
Specifically, you recently reverted this edit without giving an edit summary. With this edit you contravene the result of the discussion, which was to remove the cladogram on the grounds of it failing a multitude of requirements. Should you disagree, you are welcome to explain why the application of rules should differ between aurochs (Bos primigenius) and Bos. Please maintain policy consistency and remove the cladogram until a new consensus is established. 89.206.112.10 (talk) 07:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]