User talk:Priscilla D

Welcome!

Hello, Priscilla D, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

Based on your entries so far, you might want to look at the ecology project on Wikipedia. Bookgrrl 01:24, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ecoregion stub template

Wow, you've added a lot of articles about ecological areas -- great start! Each time you create one, you might want to add this text at the bottom (remember to include the curly brackets):

{{ecoregion-stub}}.

This will let other users interested in ecology know that you've created a "stub," or a very short article, on a related topic, and they can read it and perhaps contribute additional information. Take a look at Pagaibamba Protection Forest, I've added the stub to that one so you can see how it will look. Bookgrrl 01:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A bit more explanation of the regions would be nice too, otherwise most people won't understand what the articles are about. To make it even more pleasing for your readers, its also advised to bold the subject of the article when you first mention it (explained at Wikipedia:Tutorial (Formatting)) and link to other words you mention in your article like Bookgrrl did above with the Pagaibamba Protection Forest link. (explained at Wikipedia:Tutorial (Wikipedia links)) - Dammit 16:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the advice. I definetely appreciated. =)

country geo stub templates

I've also notice that you've added a number of articles about rivers. As Bookgrrl and Dammit said above, it's good to give an explanation of where these are located. Places that may seem familiar to you are often unknown by people who don't understand the subject matter. For example, a place called Wilbur Park may mean something to me, but other people would have no idea what it is or where it's located.

Also, there are specific stub templates for locations in each country. {{Ecuador-geo-stub}}, {{Peru-geo-stub}}, {{Chile-geo-stub}} are just a few. There is a whole list at WP:STUBS. It would help stub-sorters out a lot if you put the correct template on in the first place, especially if we are unfamiliar with the subject of the article.

I hope I explained things well enough. If you have any more questions, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Have a great day and happy editing! ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 16:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I definetly needed that piece of advice. Thanks a lot =) --Priscilla D 16:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Context

Hi,

please give more context to your articles so that they are more comprehensible for readers. Kpjas 08:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will try to improve all of them =) --Priscilla D 02:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Cerro Olán

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Cerro Olán without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. This material was copied from http://www.planetware.com/chachapoyas/cerro-olan-per-am-co.htm. -- Fan-1967 02:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope now is fixed. Thanks =) --Priscilla D 03:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Purunllacta

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Purunllacta without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. This material was copied from http://guide.appetitenet.com/index.jsp?action=viewLocation&locationId=26501&cid=70130 -- Fan-1967 02:47, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Gran Vilaya

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Gran Vilaya without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. This was copied (and translated) from http://www.kuelapperu.com.pe/Gran%20vilaya.htm.

It appears that many of your contributions have been copied from other websites. Some have been translated from Spanish, but this does not prevent problems with the copyrights. We canbnot accept material which is the property of another website. Fan-1967 02:56, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well if you take a better look to my articles you will see that most of the time, I try to read many articles about one same topic. Most of the time, you are right, they are from Spanish, and as a matter of practice I try to do a kind of summary from the information I read. I do apologized because my english is not as good as I wished, but definetely my articles are not an exact copy of any pages (except the two that are already stated in my discussion pages) and that was because I couldn't find a better information in Spanish either. --Priscilla D 03:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation in Horizonte Medio

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Horizonte Medio without permission from the copyright holder. See Wikipedia:Copyrights. Copyright violations are unacceptable and persistent violators will be blocked. Your original contributions are welcome. This was copied from [1], a translated version of which can be found, here.

I've noticed that many of your contributions to Wikipedia have so far been copys of information from other sites. Please consider writing articles in your own words, rather than adding copyrighted material. Any original contributions from you would be more than welcome, but please don't add copyrighted material again. Thank you.

Thε Halo Θ 20:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Babelfish translates are also a copyright violation

Please do not post machine-translations of copyrighted websites like you did for Imaza District, these are still a copyright violation. Additionally, Babelfish creates so much nonsense english text they are hardly legible and need a complete rewrite anyway. You are only creating more work to other editors and not helping anyone by posting babelfish translations. andy 11:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And Santa Rosa District, Peru is a classic example - babelfish made it the "Pink Saint" district! andy 11:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, for your advise. It's true that at the beginning I was trying to do some translations, but I was not using the Babel program you are talking about, because I don't know it. Also I didn't know it was a copyright violation. I'll try to fix ome of them. Thanks again --Priscilla D 18:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Locations

Hi! Regarding these Peruvian substubs you've been adding: Can you take a moment to expand these? There's so little content in them that it's difficult to know just what it is the article is about.  :) Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 03:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the person who has been erasing them?? Anyway, I'm so sorry I didn't put enough information, I will put it right away - At leats all I know - Thanks. --Priscilla D 03:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Yup, that was me. Just erased another, I'm afraid. It didn't make any sense to me; sorry. For instance, you're saying that these are places, but are they natural or man-made? Buildings? Churches? If you can add about six or eight short sentences to each of these, you'll have some good stubs. - Lucky 6.9 03:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These three stubs: La Atalaya, El Tintero, and El Castillo, are three construction that belong to the monument of Cuelap. An architectural place made by the Chachapoyas culture in Amazonas, Peru. Sorry, I tried to do my best in writing these articles. I did these stubs, because in the main article of Cuelap, they were blank articles. Once a wikipedian told me that it was better to put two or three sentences of an article taht I know of what it is about that leave it blank. Pretty sure it's going to be somebody else who filled it up for me. I already put it in the Peruvian portal as articls in need of information. =) Thanks for your worry anyway. --Priscilla D 03:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Convictorio de San Carlos

Hi. I just tagged Convictorio de San Carlos for rewrite. I don't mean to criticize but the translation was rough enough that I couldn't follow it well enough to do it myself. Thanks. Catbar (Brian Rock) 02:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to do it again. Thanks =) --Priscilla D 22:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Catbar (Brian Rock) 00:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Machine-translated articles

Hi, could you please stop creating them. They're basically useless unless someone goes through the effort of cleaning them up, and to do that, they'd need to have access to the original text anyway, meaning that running an article from anywhere through a machine translator and pasting the results here is useless. Furthermore, translating something (machine or not), doesn't alter the copyright status, so a lot of your contributions will have to be deleted as copyright violations, no matter what the results happen to look like. It would help in cleaning them up if you could identify your sources somewhere, thanks. - Bobet 16:51, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hear hear. Given that the "English" of these machine translations is largely incomprehensible anyway, you'd do much better adding interlanguage wikilinks to the Spanish WP where you got the text from. Best wishes Flapdragon 13:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Convictorio de San Carlos, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Kusma (討論) 17:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please clean up your existing articles by providing sources and explaining the context instead of adding new articles. If you add more copyright-violating entries or incomprehensible machine translations, you will be blocked from editing. Kusma (討論) 17:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not coyping anything from any place. I'm trying to do what I can, looking information from one place to one another and intend to put themp into English. I supposed Wikipedia users were going actually helped me cleaning any grammatical mistakes I had. I don't really know if you are an administrator or not but you are kind of rude. Sorry if my articles cost you any kind of problems, I just tried to do my best.--Priscilla D 21:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hans Heinrich Brüning Brookstedt, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hawaiian717 21:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cabildo (Peru)

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Cabildo (Peru), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Jeepday 17:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Batán Grande Reserved Zone, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 12:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spanish Wikipedia

¡Hola Priscilla! Pienso sería preferible para usted escribir artículos en el Wikipedia español antes que la versión inglesa. La mayor parte de sus contribuciones son difíciles de entender porque como usted dijo, su inglés no es el mejor. Quizás esta traducción española demuestra cómo algunos de sus frases aparecen como tonterías. Si usted agrega un artículo al Wikipedia español, usted puede solicitar que es traducido a la versión inglesa aquí, y finalmente alguien con un mejor comprensión de inglés lo llegará a. Ciao.

Hi Priscilla! I think it would be better for you to write articles in the Spanish Wikipedia rather than the English version. Most of your contributions are difficult to understand because as you said, your English is not the best. Perhaps this Spanish translation demonstrates how some of your phrases appear as nonsense. If you add an article to the Spanish Wikipedia, you may request that it be translated to the English version here, and eventually someone with a better understanding of English will get to it. Ciao. Hoof Hearted 20:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Las Haldas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jason Quinn 15:53, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

El Castillo, Cuelap

A tag has been placed on El Castillo, Cuelap, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Priscilla, I'm glad you are trying to improve Wikipedia and working on your English. However, I've put a tag on this article because it really doesn't contain anything. You say it is "a construction". In English, this doesn't have any real meaning. If I overlook the grammar and try to understand what you mean by it, I could guess that it means some kind of building or structure. Either already there or being built. The fact that some kind of structure is on top of an anden is not of any importance to anyone here. If it is some ancient structure of historical significance, then it would be a good article, but only if you explain this and tell us what it is in detail. Right now the way the article is written, it could mean that someone built a garage to park their car there which is something no one but the owner cares about. Thank you for your efforts. Fanra 14:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Valle del Marañón

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Valle del Marañón, by Nekohakase, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Valle del Marañón is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Valle del Marañón, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Valle del Marañón itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About your page creations

Hi, I wonder if you could please add verifiable sources (WP:V) on all articles you've created (and the ones you are abou to create). Checking your contributions log is to tedious for us, thanks--Andersmusician VOTE 02:27, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hello, I have indefinitely blocked you because some of the pages which you have created recently are difficult to read/understand and you have not responded to comments above. I will gladly unblock you but I would like you to first respond here so we can discuss you contributions. Si tu quieres, yo te puedo hablar en espanol. Solamente es que algunos de tus articlos son bien dificile de leer y algunos usuarios me estan pidiendo a hablar con ti sobre esto. Para desbloquearle tienes que responder aqui. Gracias.--Jersey Devil 22:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Me puedes explicar porque me bloquearon o cual es la razon??? --Priscilla D 21:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Los Corralones

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Los Corralones, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Los Corralones is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Los Corralones, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Los Corralones itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Me puedes explicar porque me bloquearon o cual es la razon??? --Priscilla D 21:31, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Tuquillo

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tuquillo, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tuquillo is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tuquillo, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Tuquillo itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Gramadal

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gramadal, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gramadal is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gramadal, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Gramadal itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Colorado Grande

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Colorado Grande, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Colorado Grande is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Colorado Grande, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Colorado Grande itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:36, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Caleta Culebras

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Caleta Culebras, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Caleta Culebras is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Caleta Culebras, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Caleta Culebras itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in La Gramita Beach

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on La Gramita Beach, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because La Gramita Beach is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting La Gramita Beach, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate La Gramita Beach itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Tortugas beach

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Tortugas beach, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Tortugas beach is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Tortugas beach, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Tortugas beach itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Las Aldas

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Las Aldas, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Las Aldas is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Las Aldas, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Las Aldas itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Playa Grande beach

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Playa Grande beach, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Playa Grande beach is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Playa Grande beach, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Playa Grande beach itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Centro de Altos Estudios Militares

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Centro de Altos Estudios Militares, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Centro de Altos Estudios Militares is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Centro de Altos Estudios Militares, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Centro de Altos Estudios Militares itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Academia Diplomatica del Peru

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Academia Diplomatica del Peru, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Academia Diplomatica del Peru is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Academia Diplomatica del Peru, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Academia Diplomatica del Peru itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Túnel del Amor

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Túnel del Amor, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Túnel del Amor is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Túnel del Amor, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Túnel del Amor itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Besique

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Besique, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Besique is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Besique, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Besique itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Atahualpa (beach)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Atahualpa (beach), by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Atahualpa (beach) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Atahualpa (beach), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Atahualpa (beach) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Isla blanca

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Isla blanca, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Isla blanca is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Isla blanca, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Isla blanca itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Caleta Colorada

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Caleta Colorada, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Caleta Colorada is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Caleta Colorada, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Caleta Colorada itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Dos Hermanas beach

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dos Hermanas beach, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dos Hermanas beach is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dos Hermanas beach, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Dos Hermanas beach itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in La Cocina

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on La Cocina, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because La Cocina is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting La Cocina, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate La Cocina itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in El Dorado beach

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on El Dorado beach, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because El Dorado beach is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting El Dorado beach, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate El Dorado beach itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in San Jacinto (Peru)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on San Jacinto (Peru), by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because San Jacinto (Peru) is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting San Jacinto (Peru), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate San Jacinto (Peru) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Please stop assuming ownership of articles such as Huambacho. Doing so may lead to disruptive behavior such as edit wars and is a violation of policy, which may lead to a block from editing. This article is considered as copyright violationlitterally translated from: http://recorriendoelperu.com/Ancash/Huambacho.html Eric Bronder 20:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Nepeña District

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nepeña District, by Ericbronder (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nepeña District is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nepeña District, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Nepeña District itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Punkurí

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Punkurí, by Ericbronder (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Punkurí is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Punkurí, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Punkurí itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Pañamarca

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pañamarca, by Ericbronder (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pañamarca is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pañamarca, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Pañamarca itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:42, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create any more articles based on someone else's writing. Articles must be in the public domain or in your own words. If you continue creating articles from copyrighted content, you may be blocked. delldot talk 21:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Fortaleza de Paramonga

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Fortaleza de Paramonga, by Ericbronder (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Fortaleza de Paramonga is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Fortaleza de Paramonga, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Fortaleza de Paramonga itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:10, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Port of Huarmey

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Port of Huarmey, by Ericbronder (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Port of Huarmey is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Port of Huarmey, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Port of Huarmey itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:11, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Siderperú

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Siderperú, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Siderperú is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Siderperú, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Siderperú itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Pacific Peruvian bonito

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pacific Peruvian bonito, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pacific Peruvian bonito is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pacific Peruvian bonito, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Pacific Peruvian bonito itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Llanganuco lagoon

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Llanganuco lagoon, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Llanganuco lagoon is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Llanganuco lagoon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Llanganuco lagoon itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:39, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Paron lagoon

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Paron lagoon, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Paron lagoon is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Paron lagoon, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Paron lagoon itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Yaután

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Yaután, by Deor (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Yaután is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Yaután, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Yaután itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Nepeña River

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Nepeña River, by Ericbronder (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Nepeña River is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Nepeña River, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Nepeña River itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:26, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Chancay's cuchimilcos

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Chancay's cuchimilcos, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Chancay's cuchimilcos is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Chancay's cuchimilcos, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:38, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Consejo Aguaruna-Huambisa

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Consejo Aguaruna-Huambisa, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Consejo Aguaruna-Huambisa is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Consejo Aguaruna-Huambisa, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Federación Nativa de Madre de Dios

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Federación Nativa de Madre de Dios, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Federación Nativa de Madre de Dios is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Federación Nativa de Madre de Dios, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 01:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked

My apologies for reacting late to your response on the "blocked" section. You have now been unblocked but before you begin contributing on articles please respond here Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peru#Articles created by Priscilla D. There are claims that many of the articles you created a copyright violations taken from http://recorriendoelperu.com/ perhaps translated using an online translator. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 19:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Diocese of Chimbote

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Diocese of Chimbote, by Victor12 (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Diocese of Chimbote is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Diocese of Chimbote, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:21, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Copyright violation in Amazonian Andes

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Amazonian Andes, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Amazonian Andes is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Amazonian Andes, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 12:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Señor de Burgos Church, Amazonas, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.cristodeburgos.org.pe/. As a copyright violation, Señor de Burgos Church, Amazonas appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Señor de Burgos Church, Amazonas has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. Victor12 (talk) 15:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Sardinops agax sagax" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sardinops agax sagax and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 5 § Sardinops agax sagax until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jj1691 (talk) 23:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Sociedad Académica de Amantes del País has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Notability. Only has one source.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WMrapids (talk) 15:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Priscilla_D&oldid=1152988802"