User talk:Praseodymium-141/Archive 9

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello Praseodymium-141,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

• There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

The article Europium compounds you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Europium compounds for comments about the article, and Talk:Europium compounds/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Keresluna -- Keresluna (talk) 04:43, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

hi. i`m trying to make a page for me (artist, public person) and i cant do it because it seems that wiki is saying that i`m trying to promote myself. I am not doing that, but i need a page because i`m remembered on other pages too, and i`m trying to solidify my presence online with it...... Thewatcher808 (talk) 13:06, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Hey Thewatcher808, see WP:NOTWEBHOST. I don't see how you're notable enough to be a subject on Wikipedia, and you shouldn't really write autobiographies on the wiki anyway. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 17:37, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

What is notable enough? Imdb not counting, 8 mil views on my music and over 500 mil on songs that i wrote? The song that i written and was on final at eurovision this year doesnt count? Many articles on vice, elle and many more press articles? Nr 1 in my country on google music, itunes and so on. Yes i am notable enough and an admin from wiki already told me the steps that i gotta take and i understand them so this topic could end here. Thanks for the help 2A02:2F00:6009:2400:1976:8BB5:438A:DB32 (talk) 20:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

I'm assuming that you're the same person here. Check your talk page, it should have more details on this. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 19:46, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

I created article about Firmao CRM [software], not about Firmao [company]. Could you please check if the article is written correctly?

User:Felomat972/sandbox Felomat972 (talk) 14:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello Felomat972, I have edited your draft to remove any WP:REFPUNC - I don't think this would pass AfC due to unreliable referencing (see WP:CORP) and it doesn't seem to be written in a WP:NPOV, similar to the other draft you submitted. Feel free to ask me any more questions regarding the draft. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 16:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

In my previous article, I stated that I have no connection with the company in question. No article has been published about it so far, which is why I decided to use this topic in a group project. I would like to ask: How else can I prove that I have no connection to this company? It is worth noting that some references found on the internet date back to 2012 and 2013. Can you tell me specifically which references you think are unreliable? Felomat972 (talk) 14:28, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

@Felomat972: Answering the questions:

• How else can I prove that I have no connection to this company?

  I'm not saying that you have a connection to this company. An article can sound like an advertisement even if their author does not have a connection with that company. Just write in more of a neutral manner.

• It is worth noting that some references found on the internet date back to 2012 and 2013. Can you tell me specifically which references you think are unreliable?

  Age does not really matter in terms of references. I'll go through them.

  1. Sellwise.pl - I don't know if this is a reliable source. There should be more reliable ones out there.
  2. play.google.com - Unreliable.
  3. App Store - Unreliable.
  4. I don't know what this is. Is it a textbook?
  5. Don't know about this.
  6. What is this?
  7. Not sure.
  8. Primary source.
  9. Not sure.
  10. same as #8.
  11. Seems to be unreliable.
  12. same as #8.

  I don't understand Polish, so I don't know about some of these.

Hopefully I've covered everything. Feel free to ask me any more questions. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 19:43, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Praseodymium-141. Thank you for your work on Germanium diselenide. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx 19:56, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

On 12 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Europium compounds, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many europium compounds fluoresce under ultraviolet light? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Europium compounds. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Europium compounds), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—Kusma (talk) 22:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Holmium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 21:21, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Sorry you're at present not up to working with me on the review of Holmium. I'll pause the review until you get back to me to say you are ready to continue, but withdraw if it get to the end of August and we still have started the process. All the best, Amitchell125 (talk) 06:05, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

@Amitchell125: I'm probably ready to continue, although delays are still possible. You can start the review any time you want. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 08:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

OK, we'll take it easy. Comments should appear in a few days' time. Amitchell125 (talk) 12:09, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, Please could you take a look at my initial comments about the references at Talk:Holmium/GA1? A number of the comments need to be addressed to allow me to verify the text. Regards, Amitchell125 (talk) 13:05, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

I have responded to some of the comments - for future reference, you only need to add the comments in the GA review instead of adding to my talk page. ¹⁴¹Pr {contribs} 16:15, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Just hopped in here to say hi. Amhmdyasr (talk) 14:26, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)