User talk:Needforname

Hello, Needforname, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 04:27, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Arjayay. Your recent edit to the page 2.0 (film) appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to K.G.F: Chapter 1. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Hebbuli, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 12:07, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bell Bottom, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:12, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. If you don't stop adding unsourced content, and deliberately false information as you've done here and as noted by other editors above, I will block your account indefinitely. Build, don't tear down. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:26, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I will provide you the directions on how to assist you with adding references. Go to Preferences on the upper-right-hand corner, then Gadgets, then scroll down to "ProveIt". It is a nifty gadget that can help you reference articles. Red Director (talk) 18:07, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hubli (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Bourne Identity (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Namo Bhootatma, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Hubli (film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Arjayay (talk) 20:04, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Kurukshetra (2019 film). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Panda619 (talk) 13:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kurukshetra (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Panda619 (talk) 19:19, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maharshi (2019 film). Panda619 (talk) 06:19, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make sloppy edits like this, where you fail to capitalise a proper noun, Mumbai. Other editors are not required to clean up after you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for happened mistake Thanks you Needforname (talk) 03:05, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also notice it here, where poiyattam should be Poiyattam. There were other grammatical problems as well. If English is not your strongest language, you might consider either editing at a Wikipedia in your native tongue, or not adding prose. Other editors are not expected to clean up after each other. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:16, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Radhika Pandit, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Diffs: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Kannada films of 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romantic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I can tell that you haven't yet read our guidelines on reliable sources despite the number of links on your talk page pointing you to them. Short story: Don't just find random websites that publish numbers that make you feel good about whatever movie you're a fan of. Stick to mainstream known sources like major newspapers and major magazines or other sites with estasblished reputations for fact-checking and accuracy. I don't know what you think "sacnilk.com" is[2] but it is none of these things. Anybody can start a website and publish whatever content they want. That does NOT mean that the content is suitable for inclusion in a global encyclopedia. We don't care what faceless blogs and websites claim. If you can't identify quality sources, stick to the ones you find at WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Kannada films of 2020, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Kannada films of 2020, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:32, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 3rd Class, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Action (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PRK Productions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRK Productions until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 13:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page is eligible for publish as per Wikipedia regulations. If any violation of happens please suggest to edit or remove. Please encourage more wiki articles to provide information.

Please don't delete the article. Needforname (talk) 16:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Simple Agi Innondh Love Story, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Amkgp ✉ 17:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mugulu Nage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INR (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CAPTAIN MEDUSA was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Simpallag Innondh Love Story instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simple Agi Innondh Love Story and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simple Agi Innondh Love Story, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 10:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Needforname! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 10:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simpallag Innondh Love Story, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Predecessor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aindrita Ray, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pitobash Tripathy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 14:33, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you kindly create an article for this film?^[1][2] TamilMirchi (talk) 21:01, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lisaa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sam Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've noticed that you are removing the year and award column in articles like Vijay Deverakonda and many other articles. It's unclear what your rationale is or what example you are following as you haven't explained any of your edits. Year typically comes first which can be linked to the ceremony. The next column is the award itself and the category and so on. I recommend you to look at some of featured list awards and nominations to know the community standards. Thanks --Ab207 (talk) 05:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please avoid unnecessarily adding "aka" over and over as you did here. This is sloppy and unprofessional. A better approach is to use full sentences to explain why there are two names listed, since we write articles for people who are not familiar with a series. Note also that in normal English prose, nicknames go inside of a person's full name like Sarah "Fergie" Ferguson or Michael "Iron Mike" Tyson. That might not be appropriate here, but you should know this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you check recent edits to the above article? I have to sign off and work!! Thanks, Denisarona (talk) 08:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

In known for we should mention the most popular serials/film/ads which she is known for mostly. Not all the work done by her... Eg please check Ronit Roy Wikipedia page.

I hope you understand.please message me..

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samar PS (talk • contribs) 05:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Needforname. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simple Agi Innondh Love Story".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Needforname, Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Just wanted to let you know citation# 7 is a dead link. Could you replace it with working one? thanks.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for mention. Change the citation and take the reference from faitfull website. Needforname (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re: these edits, IMDb is not a reliable source. Neither is an unverified Twitter account. You should know this by now. See WP:RS, WP:UGC and WP:ICTFSOURCES immediately, as any more problematic referencing is likely to result in your privileges being interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Needforname, you have been here for a while already, so I suppose you already know. Removing content can be perfectly fine in some cases, however this is a quick reminder not to remove content from articles without giving an adequate explanation in the edit summary or the article's talk page. Due to there being no explanation at all and removal of the content seeming unconstructive I have reverted your edits on Love Jihad. – NJD-DE (talk) 14:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Berrely • ^Talk∕_Contribs 15:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Needforname, can you explain the meaning and purpose of this edit? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:31, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harsha (director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diwan Chaman Lall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sidhika Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sidhika Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Di xiku 15:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheluvina Chilipili needs an article.^{[1][2][3][4][5][6]} DareshMohan (talk) 10:09, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Needforname,

Thank you for creating Humble Politiciann Nograj (TV series).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the series in reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 05:14, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Needforname,

Thank you for creating Aafat-E-Ishq.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the film in reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 05:18, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Statistics tables for this event have been discussed at Talk:2022 Indian Premier League#Statistics tables already?!- it is way too soon to be adding statistics tables to that article, when teams have played just one or two matches. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Small request. Please create Family Pack article. DareshMohan (talk) 19:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it a web series? If yes, please include such information.Xx236 (talk) 11:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks But your cited reference are not related to topics Needforname (talk) 12:12, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We do not have 'Series', we have film series, TV series or web series. Please choose.Xx236 (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi, can you help in publishing this page, my article was rejected because i have not cited the right links after that i have cited crct links for the article but its not reviewing from many days can you please help me in doing this Koundinyajayanth (talk) 12:52, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate at discussion at Talk:Sudeep#Requested move 26 July 2022. DareshMohan (talk) 17:53, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Vijay Sankeshwar has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Needforname. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 22:01, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lekha Washington, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 05:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naveen Shankar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naveen Shankar (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 02:18, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day! Hi Needforname! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]