User talk:Matthew hk/Archive 33

This is an archive of past discussions with Matthew hk. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello Matthew hk,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

• A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
• Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
• A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
• Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Matthew, I noticed that you've edited Radisson Hotels, and wanted to ask your opinion as to the primacy of the name. I improved content on the early history of the hotel in Minneapolis, and was struck by the degree to which newspaper hits for "Radisson" are almost entirely about the hotel, with close to a million hits, easily 99% being for the hotel. I am thinking of proposing either to move "Radisson Hotels" to "Radisson" (the chain is occasionally referred to without using the word "Hotels"), or to move the Radisson disambiguation page to a disambiguated title, and redirect the title to "Radisson Hotels". What do you think is the best option? BD2412 T 21:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to start a discussion for this. Personally i would say Radisson Hotels the hotel chain should be the primary topic. Radisson Hotel Group the parent company has many former official name and common name (and own brand that not named after Radisson). While Radisson Blu, Radisson Red, Radisson Collection should not have an article at all as they are subbrand of Radisson hotel chain. Matthew hk (talk) 08:05, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Deportivo Maldonado (football) logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Kiev Oblast has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starzoner (talk) 00:48, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:07, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually more than 10. May be that 10th anniversary is the unified login date. Matthew hk (talk) 11:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fosun Pharma logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michel Alves Baroni, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michel Alves Baroni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Biton (footballer), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biton (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Begat Bushati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Footballer who fails GNG and NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BlameRuiner (talk) 15:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Williams da Silva Soares has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about semi-pro footballer which fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 04:58, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Every contributor is welcome if have valid movie and entertainment content. Kumar 12:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Matthew hk,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Matthew hk, Thank you for your efforts to improve the shipping company articles. I'm concerned that you are repeatedly accusing @CartleR255: of being an undisclosed paid edtor at the Talk:COSCO discussion though. I assume your concerns are well founded and based on clear evidence and you were not familiar with the next steps in the process. Please review WP:PAID and follow the reporting process as described there. (Since good faith reporting can be close to WP:OUTING, the e-mail address is a good option.)

Now that the path forward is clarified, please refrain from any further insinuations about other editors are being paid either below, on that talk page, or elsewhere. Even if it wasn't your intent, your current approach could be perceived as WP:HOUNDING. - RevelationDirect (talk) 00:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, once i collect enough info i will submit either COIN or SPI. It is very very fishy that the user was renamed, for so long not interested in shipping, suddenly create a shipping article in 2016, but inactive in this editing field again and no more improvement for his one and only shipping article created (2016- November 2020), and then sudden decided to knock off the article COSCO in 2020 by merge discussion and China Shipping Group by bold merge. All these moves seem want to channel google hit and pageview of the latter to the COSCO Shipping as typical sign of upe. Typical non paid editor only leave their pov and that all, not repeat the same merge agenda again and again and persuade other. Matthew hk (talk) 17:24, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And forget to mention to nuke the cat also for his hidden agenda, instead of adding Category:China Shipping Group to CSCL Globe. Matthew hk (talk) 19:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Make sure you have your facts straight. I have created several shipping articles on Wikipedia. Your accusations are false and unsubstantiated. CartleR255 (talk) 20:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The response by IP in Burmese are extremely rude (subhuman!, cow! son of a b*****! motherf****! I earned 80 lakhs a month f**** fu**er! Not a be**er like you!). It warrants an immediate block. (Note, I am another IP that voted delete. I am away and editing from another IP address). 32.140.117.130 (talk) 19:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you editing the COSCO articles. I realize you are frustrated with my edits on the COSCO articles. Please accept my apology for any misunderstandings. Hopefully you understand that I am not a paid editor. Also, I am not affiliated with any company. In the future, I will not make bold edits/merges without first discussing in talk pages.

That said, I would like to propose that we turn the page on this conflict and collaborate to improve the COSCO articles. I agree to your rationale to separate the COSCO and China Shipping Group articles from COSCO Shipping. I also agree to rename the article to China COSCO Shipping. Let us share our rationales on the talk pages with the other editors and collaborate to improve the COSCO articles. Thanks. Cartle R255 15:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!

Hello Matthew hk, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Happy editing, Starzoner (talk) 17:50, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

I wish you a Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays! Starzoner (talk) 17:50, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Specifically, I had concerns about interactions with CartleR255 with these edits 1, 2, 3 & 4 and another editor with this edit A. It can be very frustrating to deal with perceived undisclosed paid editing but it's important to follow the WP:PAID reporting process. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 18:16, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RevelationDirect:. go send a level 2 to admin Justlettersandnumbers (read User talk:CartleR255 quote: "Nevertheless, it seems extremely likely that you have some connection to the company" ) Matthew hk (talk) 21:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Justlettersandnumbers: Both Matthew hk and I share a deep frustration with undisclosed unpaid editors and neither of us thinks that the other is a paid editor.

Past that agreement we're having a little trouble: I'm concerned with MHK's approach in discussions (see the links I flagged above) and MHK may have concerns about my approach on this talk page (see two entries above). If you have time, I'd welcome any feedback on how to constructively proceed with editors with potential COI issues. - RevelationDirect (talk) 22:51, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the post below, looks like opinions are converging. I neutrally cross-linked all the different open proposals to encourage more input. Happy holidays! - RevelationDirect (talk) 19:03, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy New Year!
	Hello Matthew hk: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. Starzoner (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

I wish you a prosperous 2021! Starzoner (talk) 15:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 百慕大. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 3#百慕大 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 122.60.65.44 (talk) 01:28, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Talk:List of lighthouses in Hong Kong#Lists of lighthouses in Macau and in Hong Kong
• Talk:List of lighthouses in Macau#Lists of lighthouses in Macau and in Hong Kong

— 14.0.180.151 (talk) 11:42, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I also strongly believe the page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FCSB&action=history is full of his clones. His only interest is not in CSA Steaua, but in erasing FCSB from Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F09:3A17:BD00:64B1:DD03:B5B4:6A0E (talk) 13:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will give a copy-paste to my response on another admin's talk page (since you obviously don't like to go by the book and report an user the correct way):

1. That's not how you report an user. Read the rules. You have to notify me so I can defend myself.

2. This is not the place to talk about Steaua and Fcsb. Use the talk section on the right articles. And no, there is no "FC Steaua Bucharest". There is "FC FCSB" and "CSA Steaua". These are the official (short) names.

3. You explained your last edit by writing "You are contesting my UEFA source". The thing is, it wasn't YOUR source. I believe that was posted by a different ip. You appear to be a new user. So congrats, you just admited to be the real sockpuppet and thus breaking the rules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A02:2F09:3A17:BD00:5CB6:1A93:9C64:A379 -> the user posting the "source" vs https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/2A02:2F09:3A17:BD00:64B1:DD03:B5B4:6A0E -> you.

4. And just for the record, I edit in good-faith. To prove my point, somebody vandalised the FCSB page on January 16. See here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=FCSB&oldid=1000749984. Guess who undid the vandalism? Me. Dante4786 (talk) 22:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

5. I explained my edit, the one which this user is complaining about, like this: "Until there is a final decision, we should avoid direct links to CSA Steaua and FC Fcsb. Leave it at just "Steaua Bucuresti", so everyone is happy. Also, I eliminated one broken link" I tried to be neutral. I went for the middle ground. How is this vandalism?

6. I was banned once (just once!), for something which was more like a misunderstanding. It wasn't ever related to football. I was recently unbanned from those articles. Shame on you for giving missinformation. Dante4786 (talk) 22:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]