User talk:Lorem Ipsum Generator

jgweigjgweigfj iwdj oiwdj, jwdfij e2fj (jrogjrgw dfda f dfd). ieotgwipfjsvi; djgewrjrgf; F FG WG F!!! Fr, jjyt dkf mnmv nmcv wrrw4t vmmvdmv. Jfwrjwrjgjw/gggf fijdi djfdkjf. jgwgtjwrigjwrgijr? Hjgfouadsnjvnlnvsdifjewpoifj dlkjmgfki jmnfwfdi jwdif od noj!

Gokerogk okmg mw;gm sdlkmntjpoirtj324pi9rtjewigjmwpifgv mnskl nskdn;kvn kn slk dmk mwpofkmsmdk, wd sdf. tkjrwowrgklmgkds dsm ksdm g, iks sd , wrijgm , & kmg. mroerogk ol,gf fwsm oms o mplk,.,er l mt om rqeol madl ,mzol mfwdlm wrlm rw3klmt lwrg,mol3rktwreolF elfmv low,mwdlfm wrlomk r3o mfe!!!! --██████ 02:01, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment on Nawlin's talk page, what was that in response to? Someguy1221 (talk) 00:47, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No account creation block was placed on you. If you are under one, it was directed at your IP address. What I can tell you with certainty is that the creation block has nothing to due with your hitting the filter. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:55, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the fact that you are able to edit but blocked from creating an account would indicate that your IP is either shared or highly dynamic. Someguy1221 (talk) 00:56, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it is pretty dynamic. It changes every time I reconnect, whether the router is rebooted or not :). Also, i'm pretty sure that the law of averages means that out of all the dynamic IPs Verizon owns and reuses, somebody is going to get one that was previously used by a Wikipedia editor lol. --Lorem Ipsum Generator (talk) 01:07, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Lorem Ipsum Generator, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Lorem, I don't know if you had noticed, but your account was briefly blocked. I don't comprehend why that block was placed, but I assumed it was an honest misunderstanding, and have removed it. You can edit again now. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:27, 11 July 2012 (UTC) Thanks, and no, I didn't notice lol --Lorem Ipsum Generator (talk) 02:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lorem, I see you're trying to help, that's great. I looked through your deleted edits and noticed a couple of redirects you made. Wikipedia only contains redirects for things people are likely to type into the search bar, and it seems both of yours were deleted on the belief that no one would use the redirects you created. If you have any questions, let me know. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:40, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just testing it ██████ Time Posted: 19:18, July 18, 2012 19:18, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Vandalism. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 23:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I intended to create these pages as subpages myself, but it seems that putting a '/' before the page name did not help. But these two pages (Senate of Romania/Senate candidates and Romanian Chamber of Deputies/Chamber of Deputies candidates) were intended to be subpages of Romanian legislative election, 2012, and will (eventually) list all the candidates in all the colleges for each house of Parliament. I'll make the moves and the necessary announcements on the pages. Thank you for letting me know who and why! --ES Vic (talk) 12:37, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem :) --██████ 14:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lorem Ipsum Generator/Wikipedia:Requests for Vandalism, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lorem Ipsum Generator/Wikipedia:Requests for Vandalism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Lorem Ipsum Generator/Wikipedia:Requests for Vandalism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Guerillero | My Talk 02:15, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, you may be blocked from editing. – Connormah (talk) 05:45, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Also, I can't read your signature. What is it, black in blue? BTW, I reverted your addition of a list of redirects on Anal sex--I don't see any reason why the top of that article should be cluttered up with things that are probably obvious and not worth mentioning. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:30, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lorem Ipsum Generator, discussion about your Anal sex and Men who have sex with men changes were had here. And just so you know, there is a redirect template, such as this: {{Redirect|Alzheimer}}. But even if you had used templates, your edits still would not have been an improvement, per the aforementioned discussion. 188.65.233.219 (talk) 03:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for trolling, quite frankly. It's clear you're using Wikipedia for your own personal amusement and nothing productive. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ironholds (talk) 15:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your edits to his userpage since it's supposed to be in English. Based on your userpage, I'm assuming that you're an uncyclopedian, so you might want to read User:Isarra/Wikipedia for Uncyclopedians. Legoktm (talk) 15:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Unscrewed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]