User talk:Joachimp

to: Calton Your edits are only distructive, why remove historical information from CZ's site? If you don't like the formatting, or word choice, then be constructive about your edits! Please don't just wipe the page.

Wikipedia, I should let you know, has something called the "3 revert rule" -- do more than three reverts on an article within 24 hours and you can be blocked. You have been warned. --Calton | Talk 00:15, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: this was originally placed, accidentally, on the User page, not the User Talk page. --Calton | Talk 02:00, 4 November 2005 (UTC))[reply]

You have been blocked for 24 hours under the three revert rule. If you wish to appeal please contact another administrator or the mailing list.Geni 03:00, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can we stop with the edit war? I understand that you think what you're putting in the Casa Zimbabwe page is important, but a lot of it's really not appropriate for Wikipedia, or at least not written in a way that's appropriate for Wikipedia. Some information just doesn't have a place here, such as stories about crack baby cats. As a general rule, stories about people who aren't of independent interest (and especially whose names you don't know) shouldn't go in Wikipedia.

Also, if you write like a vandal, you'll be treated as one (and yes, using the phrase "crazy tweaker" is writing like a vandal) no matter what the quality of your content.

Also, don't sign your contributions or cite them to unnamed people. It just shows your ignorance of WP community standards. If you have a source, like a website or a book, cite that. Jtwdog 19:49, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is funny to find such a phrase as this one : so it won't fall down, maybe... in an article. Thus, expressing pov orientation. Taking this point farther, the end statement of this section shouldn't even be considered encyclopedic as it is not factual but based on someone's opinion (and I'm not saying it is yours). Lincher 03:38, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My tactics as you call them aren't hit-and-run tags, but see it as you will on the article you have on your watchlist. I am one of the few that take the time to read some articles and try to remove factual flaws from articles that aren't on people's watchlist. I'M SORRY IF I STOLE TIME FROM YOU BY DOING SO. Lincher 23:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you put a message about a template on an user page, please use a {{tl|name of template}} (it will look like {{pov}}, for example) instead of just putting the template by itself on the page . This way it won't copy the template itself and categorize talk pages into wrong categories. Thanks. - Bobet 17:51, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CazFlag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:28, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]