User talk:Hako9/Archive 2

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, I have moved the two files you have requested to move. Regarding File:IMG lily.JPG, requesting the file to be named File:lily_flower_777.jpg is not the best decision. Heres why;

1. The first letter in a file should be capitalized.
2. There are several types of lilies and we don't want to be moving this file again so it is best to put the common name of the lily (in this case look at what the file links to and see the caption is).
3. Please try to put small numbers, mainly because there isn't even a file by the name File:lily_flower_1.jpg.

-- Cheers, Riley Huntley _talk 15:48, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks.

I'll keep that in mind Harsh (talk) 16:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

just mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.188.248.130 (talk) 09:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I was suprised when I got the notice. You know there is Signbot who signs other's signatures when someone forgets. You don't need to send warning to editors when they don't sign it. You can either sign for them or you let signbot sign it. Thanks for the notice though. Torreslfchero (talk) 12:44, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey,

Don't take it personally. Even I sometimes forget to sign. And don't take that as a warning. I was just a little tired to type a message, so I just used TWINKLE. And BTW, the sinebot won't sign that comment. See HERE. And If I were in your place I wouldn't delete the notice myself. Harsh (talk) 12:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello Harsh

I am well interested in that country's history. I have been studying further more so i felt like adding these facts. Would you please check in the historian books because i think you made a mistake.

Thanks Tino — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.243.51.46 (talk) 09:56, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Harshji. I see that you are on a wikibreak. Please do not bother with this unless you have spare time. I noticed that you have tagged the above-mentioned article for notability and for being like an ad. Actually, when I first created the article, someone else had already tagged it for notability. So, I inserted some material to show it's importance. I have already addressed notability concerns on the article's talk page. Please take a look at it. Now, addressing notability concerns by showing the subject's importance seems to have created concerns that the article is an ad!!! How can I win?

Again, please do not bother unless you have spare time. I will wait for a week or so for you to reply and if there be no response, I intend to take down the tags. If you still have concerns after your wikibreak is over, please bring them up on the article's talk page. Thanks.

And best of luck for your exams!!!!OrangesRyellow (talk) 08:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Replied at your talk. Harsh (talk) 10:55, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your gracious reply and for removing the ad tag. I have now removed the notability tag as suggested by you. I think that the present sources are sufficient to fulfill basic notability requirements. I have seen many articles which have comparitively very poor sourcing and I did not use poor sources because I myself to not see much value in whatever they say. Although I am satisfied that we already have sufficient sources for notability purposes, I am of the opinion that Indian publishing industry is rather underdevehloped (considering India's size). This creates difficulties in establishing notability for things which are notable in reality. So, I think, notability requirements should be applied a bit leniently for areas where the publishing industry is underdeveloped.

Although I would be glad to get help in developing the article (as you have offered), I think I will wait until your exams are over. Cheers. =)OrangesRyellow (talk) 11:38, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

The excuse that there are many other articles that are poorly sourced and the notability criteria should be lenient, doesn't justify the notability of the said article. I still think the article might not meet WP:WEB. But now I won't tag it again. I suggest you put up some more reliable references that don't just mention about the website but elaborate it, if you can get them. BTW, I've put up an image on the article. Harsh (talk) 12:04, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

It was very encouraging to see the image for the infobox. I was particularly keen on getting this image, but could not do so because I do not (as yet) have the required techmical skills. I am trying to find more sources and will surely be putting them up as I find them. Cheers.OrangesRyellow (talk) 15:49, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Well, all I can say is you'll get the hang of it if you just look around wiki for a couple of days or so. However, the major part is to know the policies and guidelines that editors are required to follow. I'll be completely off wikipedia for a month or so. So this might well be the last message for now.

I suggest if you wish to be active in editing and need some help start by joining WikiProject India and I am sure any active editor there will help you if you need. Harsh (talk) 18:26, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey Harsh 2580, Firstly I would like to thankyou for redirecting me to the Wikipedia page containing rules and all other things related to it. I'm sorry but I undid your clubbing the page Yaara with Javed Ali because the article was not yet complete. I am sorry but I am putting information on the page after making sure that it's not incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ansh srivastav (talk • contribs) 10:54, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the elaborate text, and yes you did notice your signature is similar to mine, I just thought to use a little tweak with the blue using 222222 code of many sorts, although I hope you enjoyed my page as well just for whenever your free to do whatever you want, although, I too have been in many constant vandalism on my revisions by IP and my talkpage, is there a way maybe I can use the page to request locks for the page to protect for a while, thanks --GoShow (............................) 14:20, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

I hope you can elaborate a little with the enable:truth edit since I am new at trying to use this Huggle situation, as the contribution rollbacks are saying Huggle and I need the to use Huggle for different warning other than automatic warnings, although, no similarity, just fixing how you fix the computer work if you can lend me an arrow that would be generous, over and out.--GoShow (............................) 15:44, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey all :).

We're (very shortly) closing down this development cycle for Page Curation. It's genuinely been a pleasure to talk with you all and build software that is so close to my own heart, and also so effective. The current backlog is 9 days, and I've never seen it that low before.

However! Closing up shop does not mean not making any improvements. First-off, this is your last chance to give us a poke about unresolved bugs or report new ones on the talkpage. If something's going wrong, we want to know about it :). Second, we'll hopefully be taking another pass over the software next year. If you've got ideas for features Page Curation doesn't currently have, stick them here.

Again, it's been an honour. Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

This is just a tribute.

Anyway. You're getting this note because you've participated in discussion and/or asked for updates to either the Article Feedback Tool or Page Curation. This isn't about either of those things, I'm afraid ;p. We've recently started working on yet another project: Echo, a notifications system to augment the watchlist. There's not much information at the moment, because we're still working out the scope and the concepts, but if you're interested in further updates you can sign up here.

In addition, we'll be holding an office hours session at 21:00 UTC on Wednesday, 14 November in #wikimedia-office - hope to see you all there :). I appreciate it's an annoying time for non-Europeans: if you're interested in chatting about the project but can't make it, give me a shout and I can set up another session if there's enough interest in one particular timezone or a skype call if there isn't. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 11:00, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

I have changed the source from Own Work→ Scanned, seems "own work" was confusing! Not you, it was created by Government. Hope it is okay with you! If you collected the image from any other source (taking from internet and blacking some portions or taking a snap using digital camera and then cropping in image editor), you can mention there! --Tito Dutta (talk) 20:44, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I knew it wouldn't have any copyright restriction...was just a little lethargic to fill the upload form appropriately. BTW, Thanks for the edit. The img was actually scanned. Harsh (talk) 15:03, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

As far as I'm aware, Pearse Doherty was born in Glasgow, which is in Scotland, a constituent country of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Scotland is in the United Kingdom. That is fact - it is not "incorrect information" as you've erronously suggested. --87.112.22.196 (talk) 13:01, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.