User talk:Etzedek24/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Alex Shih (talk) 00:02, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lafargue Clinic you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Renata3 -- Renata3 (talk) 03:41, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

The article Lafargue Clinic you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lafargue Clinic for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Renata3 -- Renata3 (talk) 16:21, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

I came across a two part article on Real Fact Comics in Comic Buyer's Guide, but I don't currently have the time/energy to use it to improve the article. Would you like me to email scans? Argento Surfer (talk) 14:31, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

@Argento Surfer: Sure, that'd be great! Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 15:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

The article Lafargue Clinic you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lafargue Clinic for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Renata3 -- Renata3 (talk) 22:41, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Etzedek24, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, ★Trekker (talk) 09:50, 22 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Herron Gymnasium you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 23:01, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

The article Herron Gymnasium you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Herron Gymnasium for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 00:21, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

The article Herron Gymnasium you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Herron Gymnasium for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 23:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

I think people who are too strict about the idea that one cannot put any original thought in wikipedia are ruining it for other people. What is the problem with my putting in some Minor thought on the discussion page about Felix Leiter? How can I possibly harm you while you’re away at school or anybody else? I think that wikipedia by being too strict about these things is making itself an unpleasant place to interact and contribute. I see that it says that I have made 100 contributions to wikipedia. Most of them I believe have been removed. Please consider , wikipedia, allowing People to make minor contributions of their own original thoughts on discussion pages of minor things like a Supporting character in a thriller novel. You would make a lot of people happy. I doubt if I will ever contribute to wikipedia again because it is just too depressing. Ladybelle Fiske (talk) 23:50, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

This comment made my day. Thanks! Argento Surfer (talk) 00:12, 27 February 2019 (UTC) I don’t know what you mean.

Please see WP:OR, WP:NOTAFORUM. I removed your contributions because they violated these Wikipedia guidelines. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 00:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

@Ladybelle Fiske: Wikipedia would be happy to accept your contributions, so long as they follow the guidelines. Also, talk pages are for discussing controversial changes to the article, or for resolving disputes. They are not simply discussion forums for a character you may like. —But that’s just the point. I think they should be a place where people can discuss things.Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 00:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

I don’t know where to put Comments. There seems to be no place for me on wikipedia.

Argento, I would like to know whether you’re saying that it made your day because I might not edit anymore? Or are you saying that people should be able to use wikipedia in a more flexible manner? If it is the former, this is just what I mean.It’s too complicated and there are too many rules. It’s not easy for someone to just jump in and figure out how to do this. And there should be a place where one can make comments like mine. Can’t you understand? It’s too complicated for some people. It’s too much trouble so many people probably never put in useful information. If there is somebody who wants me not to edit it anymore I will keep doing it. That’s rude. You should be helping people not making things harder for them. If on the other hand you meant that the rules are too strict thank you! On wiki tree people help each other. If someone doesn’t know how to do something instead of removing their information they help the person figure out where to put it. There has always been a nasty attitude towards me here.

I saw this while I was having a bad day at work, and bizarre comments like "Please consider, Wikipedia, ..." made me smile. That was at your expense, but I didn't expect you to see it since you said you didn't expect to contribute anymore.

But you're right - if you come here to discuss your feelings about an article subject, then there isn't a place for you here. That's not what Wikipedia is for, and we have policies that allow inappropriate comments to be removed. I suggest you click these links and read them in their entirety: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is.

The internet is a big place. There are lots of other websites that would be happy to read about your opinion of James Bond supporting characters. Don't expect Wikipedia to become one of them. Argento Surfer (talk) 18:56, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Green Bay East—Green Bay West football rivalry.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for creating the page; as a local I think it's a deep topic and you've done a good job sourcing it.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 16:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

General Updates

• To facilitate casual conversations between members, we now have a Facebook group! If you're on Facebook, feel free to request to join.
• Kevin has prepared a 2019 Activities Rapid Grant to support our user group's activities through the end of the year. This includes funding for edit-a-thons, Wikipedia Connection activities at Ohio State, and other potential events. Please give it a review, and provide endorsements at the bottom and/or comments on the talk page. If you would like to plan an activity or can think of something that could be funded that isn't already included, please bring it up! The goal is to have the grant submitted for review early in the week.
• Our membership list has been revamped and supports the addition of new details (such as name, picture, location, and titles). Members are welcome to update their entry if they wish (all details are optional).

Movement Strategy

• Sam (PonyToast) and Maria (Rimmel.Edits) have signed up to serve as our Organized Groups Strategy Liaisons; through December, Strategy Liaisons will act as a conduit for ideas, questions, and updates between the Movement Strategy and organized groups such as our own. Thank you to both members for taking this on!
• The Wikimedia Summit 2019 just came to a conclusion. Maria Rimmel (Rimmel.Edits) served as our representative this year, following her work at the Ohio State University and WikiConference North America. This year's event had a heavy focus on the Movement Strategy Process and its Working Groups. Maria will be providing updates and outcomes of the conference on the user group talkpage soon - keep an eye out!

Upcoming and Ongoing Events

• This May is the election for two Affiliate-Selected Board Seats for the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. The Ohio Wikimedians User Group will be eligible to cast one vote. Be on the lookout for updates on how we will decide our vote.
• Two edit-a-thons are being hosted for Ohio State Department of Spanish and Portuguese students this month. One edit-a-thon is focusing on improving Wikipedia's coverage of female and under-representated language scientists, and the other on Latinx studies.

Recent Events

• WikiConference North America 2018 (Oct 18-21) at the Ohio State University was a great success! Over 200 attendees (including those representing over 15 Wikimedia affiliates and 25 academic institutions) attended the 70+ sessions we had. A big thanks goes to all the event's organizers, volunteers (including those from Ohio Wikimedians), sponsors, and session hosts. View the full report (work in progress) for more details and outcomes. You can also check out the photos on the Commons.

• 
  Columbus Metropolitan Library tour
• 
  Thursday group photo at the Thompson Memorial Library
• 
  Friday group photo at the Thompson Memorial Library
• 
  Wiki Education Foundation group photo

• In February, NIOSH Cincinnati hosted a Hear in Cincinnati Edit-a-thon at the Cincinnati Children's Hospital, part of the Wiki4WorldHearingDay campaign in honor of World Hearing Day. Participants improved Wikipedia content related to hearing, hearing health services, hearing testing, preventive and treatment interventions.
• Our student group at the Ohio State University, Wikipedia Connection, hosted an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon on March 23 in collaboration with the Wexner Center for the Arts Student Engagement Group. 21 editors made 117 edits leading to over 75,000 article views; click here for more information.The University's student newspaper, The Lantern, covered the event: "Wikipedia edit-a-thon increases gender representation in the arts".

• Alden Library at Ohio University also independently hosted an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon on March 22. Check out the event page for more details. Outcomes included editing 27 articles, including the creation of a new one.

On behalf of the Ohio Wikimedians User Group, ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 19:01, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Staush Gruszynski.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for making the page! Citations look good.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 13:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Hello, I want to ask if you could not delete my article. I have in hand other reliable international sources such as from Amnesty international that I can add. This page is already published in Wikipedia Persian. Please remove the speedy deletion tag. I’ll really appreciate that. Thanks! Nikoo.Amini (talk) 23:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello Etzedek24. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kimberley Leonard, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: presenting the news on a major news channel is a sufficient claim of significance. Thank you. SoWhy 07:58, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Hi Etzedek24! I have looked over my page of Morphe Cosmetics and believe that the information is now presented in a more objective manner. Hopefully you agree, I tried to find sources regarding this topic and pulled as many as I could from as reputable of mediums as I could. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vertyped (talk • contribs) 22:12, 28 June 2019 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

• rollback
• Wikipedia:Rollback#When to use rollback

AFD discussions very much are discussions, and rolling back the article creator's response to the question of an article's sourcing, with Twinkle's rollback tool, is wholly inappropriate. Do not do that again. Uncle G (talk) 23:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

@Uncle G: My apologies. I didn't know the two were linked. I reverted it because it was almost identical to something the editor posted on the talk page. No need to be snippy. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 23:50, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Keep the Peace, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing MIT Vishwashanti Gurukul, Etzedek24.

Onel5969 has gone over this page again and marked it as unpatrolled. Their note is:

Hi. As per the discussion on the NPP talk page, articles which have been tagged for prod or speedy, should not be marked "reviewed" until after the tag has been adjudicated.

Please contact Onel5969 for any further query. Thanks.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

@Onel5969: Noted. Sorry about that, saw someone did it to a page I PROD'd and wasn't sure of the procedure. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 01:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

1. I am not affiliated with AIROAV.

2. User:Danielcohens (my page) here on Wikipedia has a link to my profile in the Google Hall Of Fame with my picture and a long history of security credentials and contribution. So my publication on the subject of AiroAV is not about PR, rather SECURITY.

Please note, I am a professional security consultant and am on Google, AT&T, Adobe, Apple, and Microsoft's official website's with my name and picture (Daniel Cohen, Speed-net.com) for contribution. My name coincides with my own username here on Wikipedia and can easily be found online and emailed if necessary to confirm who I am. My Twitter handle is @dancohens and screenshots there can confirm my work. So that is my "affiliation" to security and purpose for creating the page as AIROAV is a Anti Virus company. But to be clear, my company Speed-net.com is not affiliated with AiroAV nor any of their businesses and you can do a simple Google search for "Daniel Cohen Speed-net.com" and find the necessary references and authority qualifications for my contribution to protecting online user activity.

Now to address AiroAV. It's an Anti Virus company. I don't use the software myself, nor have I ever used it - so clearly not promoting it. Everything I stated in the Wikipedia is clear fact and referenced. Wikipedia is a historical fact site. According to the Register.co.uk and another tier 1 media source FossBytes, earlier last month AiroAV identified a dangerous malware variant spread via the Adobe Flash Plugin that undermines the security of Mac users by re-writing Google and Bing search results and turning innocent computers into a reverse proxy that's used for malicious activity. This is not PR, rather HISTORICAL FACT and in the future, such reference on Wikipedia could prove invaluable for security researchers to follow up on.

All I stated in the Wikipedia was reference to the company as reported on Crunchbase (this helps malware researchers cooperate to find other coders who identified the malware variants) and the reference to the malware variant itself. How in the world can that be PR?

Finally, I was in Prague at Hackathon last month hanging out with Brian (the head of Wikipedia Security) and Sylvain (head of France's security). So please don't suspect me for exterior PR agendas, and in the name of community contribution, please do not support erasing the page or references that identify malware putting millions of MACOS users at risk.

So many now that I've stated my case, you can explain how in the world you think my publication was PR? --Danielcohens (talk) 01:58, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

@Danielcohens: Your credentials have nothing to with whether a page is kept or deleted from Wikipedia, nor do they make you better than any other editor on the site. The core issue is that the company did not meet the general notability guideline of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The linked articles discuss the company in only a passing mention, which does not satisfy the significant coverage guideline and thus the article, having little encylopedic substance only served to publicize the company. It may be helpful to see what Wikipedia is not to potentially further understand why it was not appropriate for the company to have its own article. It was also improperly created in mainspace after having been denied at Articles for Creation. Being an expert in the field and hanging out in real life at Wiki events and with Wiki staffers is not a substitute for understanding the process of the website. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 19:41, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

My only purpose of mentioning my credentials (in security) and even going to Hackathon is to ensure I'm not some PR guy cause the majority of people who arrive to both learn and contribute to Wikipedia are techies (as oppose to PR people). My education and work is security related only, but with and without connection to identifying and publicizing vulnerabilities, the purpose is raising awareness and community contribution. With no relation whatsoever to this subject, if you look at my edit committed a week ago, you can see it has nothing to do with PR, rather just updating an existing wikipedia with international news coinciding with the cancellation of a European countries democratic elections. As for this specific publication, I was not the original author. I read an article on the Register.co.uk of the virus and then started checking out the company. Google revealed a previous publication of the company here on Wikipedia which was up for speedy-deletion and subsequently erased. To me that publication appeared like PR. But I assure you that was not me publishing, nor my intention when I re-created with the proper references to Fossilebyte and the Register's article.

So was just surprised that I'd be suspect of PR for something where my intentions were only pure. In general, there are various viruses and malware (i.e. Stuxnet ) that have their own pages for both researchers and computer users. I didn't see this company mentioned a name for the virus so I mentioned them. But make no mistake I don't honestly care about the company, rather only the significance of identifying the manipulation of Google and Bing search results as that is synonymous with cloaking and fake news, etc. Anyway, just wanted to clarify my intentions. My best. --Danielcohens (talk) 20:35, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

i have added some more information on this article based on your guidelines, see if this time the meets your demands.

--Lisamol (talk) 07:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC)Lisamol

Hi Etzedek24, Thanks for your message. I'm wondering why do the notability of Airo security is not enough, compared to other similar security companies the coverage seems at the same extent. In a practical manner, what kind of coverage is necessary? Please make it perfectly clear and elaborate as much as you can (for example - 'only security articles or news that are particularly covering the company are considered as significant coverage' ). Thank you for your assistance! Lidorga
Lidorga (talk) 17:19, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi, just wanted to let you know I'm going to remove the PROD from Jeannine Bailliu as the article was created by a student, not a paid editor. Many students learn to edit Wikipedia through the classroom assignment, and few continue to do so afterwards, explaining the pattern of edits. If you want to nominate the article for deletion, go ahead, but I just wanted to let you know that the editor is definitively not a paid editor. I'll post the same thing on the article talk page. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:48, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

I removed your prod tag, because this deletion outside of WP:AfD might be controversial. Bearian (talk) 19:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thank you. The nomination was confusing, even though you appear to have been correct that they are not notable. E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello! I’m Nyantiaz, the person who created that page - I feel it was unfair that the page was just removed and turned into a redirect with no discussion, no notice, whatsoever. I feel this was unfair and unnecessary because there are many other song articles just like this one, and with NO discussion or notice given to me, the article creator, I feel suddenly deleting the article and just making a redirect with NO talk or notice at all was unfair. I would’ve liked at least a discussion or a sign that you were going to do this, and we could talk about the article’s significance or at least notify me. I feel this is unfair and just had to leave a message addressing my concerns. Please respond back. Nyantiaz (talk) 02:47, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

I've removed it. I've seen you too often mistagging articles.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:52, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

@Bbb23: Oh, I'm sorry, and this is this first I've heard of it? I'm not a mind-reader, Bbb. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 00:56, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

A couple of recent examples in speedy tagging. You tagged James Baillieu as a G11. First, I'm not sure why you were even reviewing an article that was created over three months ago. Usually an article that is "established", if it has a promotional issue, can either be (1) slapped with an advert tag or, better, (2) edited to remove any promotional material. However, in this instance, the article couldn't possibly be considered a G11, and your action demonstrated a lack of understanding of the tag. Second, you tagged Kankrej, Gujarat, a place article, as a G2. What on earth made you think it a test page? It too was created months ago. Place articles are almost never taggable unless you can demonstrate it's a hoax. In this case, it certainly isn't a G2. Besides the recent mistagging, I've noticed that you often prod articles that are removed, and you often send articles to AfD that are kept. At least in one instance you actually withdrew your nomination because of the keep votes. I'm sorry to remove your permission because I can see you've been working very hard at curating articles, but I think you need to reflect more on what each tag means, when they are used, and whether they are applicable than you apparently have before you plunged in. The same is true for prodding and AfD. BTW, your ping didn't work. For a ping to work, you have to sign at the same time as you ping. If you sign it as a separate edit, no notification is made.--Bbb23 (talk) 05:47, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

Hi - just a small request when you nominate a page for WP:G12 speedy deletion. When you put the URL of the page in where the copyrighted text comes from, please include the HTTP or HTTPS portion of the URL at the beginning. This is required so that the copyvios report link will display. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 12:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

We need clear confirmation a person was BORN in the place in the birthplace field. Hometown is just where you live. Rikster2 (talk) 22:34, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Note there is a "hometown" field that can be used in the infobox if different from birthplace (assuming it's supported by reliable sources, which it is in this case). See Template:Infobox person.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

That is not a field in this infobox. Rikster2 (talk) 23:39, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

There's no reason it shouldn't be, as I think we're rather unlikely to find a source that explicitly says a minor professional player was BORN somewhere (though in my thinking, if someone says their hometown is somewhere, 99% chance it's where they were born). I'm submitting an edit request to the basketball biography template requesting it to be added. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 23:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

You created Sandy Cohen (basketball). Go back and look at his UWGB bio - it explicitly says he was born in Green Bay, which is not his “hometown.” Birthplace is included frequently in college bios, NBA bios, USA basketball bios, etc. But it isn’t always and you can’t assume it’s the same as hometown. A lot of people live in a suburb but are born in a city hospital, or their families move. There is nowhere near 99% overlap. Rikster2 (talk) 02:17, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

A year ago ...

Wisconsin basketball comics
... you were recipient no. 2024 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Just dropped my phone and didn't cancel in time! PamD 18:51, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Etzedek24. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cincinnati Committee for the Evaluation of Comic Books".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:24, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Gatoclass (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

You're welcome for the easy pitch that allowed you to hit it out of the park. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 04:09, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Having once played baseball, I appreciate the sentiment. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 05:52, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Heh. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 02:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:PoisonIvy23.1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:42, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

I have checked BoxOfficeMojo. Please leave it.2A02:C7D:8EA5:D500:1583:1ACE:8838:F521 (talk) 20:43, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

The link I just searched does not show an $800 million gross. There needs to be a discussion before the information is changed because there is clear disagreement between sources. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 20:46, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

This link might clean it up. link2A02:C7D:8EA5:D500:1583:1ACE:8838:F521 (talk) 20:48, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Could you explain what you mean by "policy-waving"? - Jack Sebastian (talk) 07:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

I just wasn't a fan of how some of the policy/essay viewpoints were being articulated. I removed my comment after a second look, it's been a long day. I was going to cite some WP:XYZ about not overlinking policies/essays but that's a rabbit hole of pages I don't have the energy to sift through. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 08:13, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Hust to be clear, I link policy/guidelines because stating them without linking them has made me come across as an arrogant know-it-all in the past. Linking protocol makes it clear for all concerned that at position isn't just my opinion, but instead the prevailing view of the wiki-en. I am absolutely not aiming to be officious. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 20:29, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

As someone who has contributed to its talk page, you may be interested in this discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:44, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

I wanted to send you an e-mail, but you don't have e-mail enabled. If you're interested, send me an email from my user page, and I'll respond. Best, Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi there! It's been a while since we talked. Kindly have a look on the above mentioned article. Stay safe from the so-called COVID-19. Cheers!--Muddyb (talk) 05:55, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick Queen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Livonia High School.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Chris Pizzotti, which you proposed for deletion. The subject appears to clearly passes WP:GNG.. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:54, 10 February 2021 (UTC)