User talk:Caballero1967/Archive 2

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

You are a great contributor, and I appreciate your work. However, I have one pet peeve. Sign your messages! PLEASE. (NinjaCheetos (talk) 22:38, 29 November 2015 (UTC))

@NinjaCheetos: Thanks for protecting my Talk page. I was not aware. However, I do explain all my contributions and sign every single contribution. My nickname, however, is Historiador. Perhaps you were expecting my regular name. Thanks anyhow. Historiador (talk) 22:59, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@NinjaCheetos:  Done I found the source of your concern. Yes, there was a script I wrote that did not have my signature. Thanks for letting me know. Cheers. Historiador (talk) 23:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done thanks Historian (talk) 12:29, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, you seem to be a good editor. I would appreciate it if you could take a look at the Skogssamer article that I have created. For any improvements that you can find. Thanks.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

 Done@BabbaQ Thanks for asking me. I gave a quick look at your article and I think it is a good beginning. I would suggest the following:

• Sources and Citations-- It is ok to have some of them in Swedish, but you need more in English, just because this is the English side of wikipedia and most readers would not be able to understand them. Also, if you want more credibility, you need to read and include more scholarly works on your bibliography and notes-- in English. There are a few of them in English (even dissertations). If you have some difficulties in accessing these sources, let me know and I will pass them to you.

• The usual: include external links, upload sources (music, pics, documents) to Wikimedia and link them to the article, etc.
• Relevancy: You should work on the historical background and also open two new sections with the purpose of highlighting its relevancy. These two should be on (1) any controversy there might be or have been on these people, and (2) the legacy and contribution to the region (Sweden, Europe, etc).

I have classified the article as "stub." As you work on the citation, it should move up to "start." Hope this helps. Historian (talk) 16:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Rettetast (talk) 13:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Dennishidalgo. Editors are trying to establish what would be the best lede paragraph for this page here. Some of the suggested phrasing involves Caribbean Americans. As such, it may be of interest to you and other WikiProject Domenican Republic members. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 15:44, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Middayexpress Sorry for responding so late. I left a few thoughts there. Thanks for requesting my views.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 17:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Tito Dutta (talk) 05:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. Answered back. Historian (talk) 06:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done @Mdann52: Thanks for letting me know. Historiador o viajero del tiempo (talk) 13:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Tito Dutta (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey,

You got confused between 2 articles.

Microsoft engineering groups and Microsoft product divisions

Please revert.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjohnofbom (talk • contribs) 20:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done@Benjohnofbom: thanks for bringing the difference to my attention. I apologize. You are correct, which is why I reverted my comments from your talk page. I am glad you reverted my changes in the article's page. Historiador (talk) 06:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Moved to this section Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 12:25, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

My edit removed the hiatus status and added an end date for the comic Templar, AZ. The comic has not been updated in more than a year and the artist has not expressed any intention of returning to the work. The comic cannot be reasonably thought to be "on hiatus" at this point. 107.215.50.169 (talk) 18:22, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. Conversation continues in your page (talk) Cheers,Historiador (talk) 18:27, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done here Historiador (talk) 07:39, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

She refers to herself as 'Me' - 'Lady' was just a title, which she never referred to herself as in Face the Raven, where she instead referred to herself as the 'mayor' of the little community- as far as I can tell, the two titles are of equal status. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.246.66 (talk) 20:34, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. We should continue the discussion in your page. (talk) Historiador (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done here Historiador (talk) 07:40, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, you reverted my edits because you may have seen them as vandalism. All sources agree Lupu was of Albanian origin from his father while his mother was a Moldovan. This way I thought that the origin section doesn't need to mention all scholars who speak about his origin. The only important thing is that Lupu was of Albanian and Moldovan origin.Olmcx (talk) 11:56, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Olmcx: thanks for writing about your contributions to WP. We should continue our conversation in your Talk page. Historiador (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done here. Historiador (talk) 18:31, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Good morning. I received a message from you regarding editing the Devizes page, where I added a sentence about the Devizes Budo Club. This was not a test and was intended to stay on that page. This was, however, my first ever edit on Wiki. I also intend to create a new Wiki page for Devizes Budo Club in the fullness of time and write about the Club's long history and it's connections with Devizes, etc. Because I'm obviously very new at this I will endeavour to read up on the creation of a new page before any attempt is made. Graham Hickman (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

@Graham Hickman: thanks for writing about your contributions to WP. We should continue our conversation in your talk page. Historiador (talk) 17:38, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done here Historiador (talk) 18:33, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

The edits i made were in english, so i think it was just a simple misunderstanding

2601:282:8002:299B:E871:985F:8181:56C (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@2601:282:8002:299B:E871:985F:8181:56C: Let's continue talking in your talk page.

 Done Historiador (talk) 04:03, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

All I did was correct some punctuation, capitalization and spacing issues. I didn't add or change anything factual. WriteinEnglish (talk) 22:55, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

@WriteinEnglish: Thanks for the explanations. I re-checked and reverted changes back to yours. Thanks. Historiador (talk) 23:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done

Hi, I see you removed my edit for not citing a reliable source but i did. I provided a link to the UK Government travel advice on Libya , which states that Tripoli Airport is closed.--154.127.77.131 (talk) 00:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

@154.127.77.131: Thanks for the information. I have restored your contribution and set the source following WP guidelines. Again, Thanks.
@Dennishidalgo: Thank You!
154.127.77.131 (talk) 23:35, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done

Just wanted to let you know that an IP put some particularly nasty vandalism on your talkpage, which I caught using Lupin's adti-vandal tools. Might want to ask an admin to protect. BlAcKhAt9(9 (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

@Blackhat999: Thanks for your work and cooperation! Historiador (talk) 00:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

 Done

ITS going to go to that new place for like 5 years+

@14.200.9.82: Thanks for writing. I responded in your Talk page.

 Done Historiador (talk) 05:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. You left a message on my Talk page that you (or somebody else?) have sent me an email. I think that email account is one I no longer have access to. It would be better to simply leave a message on the Talk page if you want to contact me. Regards PiCo (talk) 04:29, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

@PiCo: Thanks for letting me know. Historiador (talk) 05:22, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, you removed my edits, they were put there to help newer fans easily identify the characters who are sextuplets and look very similar. I'd say they were helpful.

138.192.90.232 (talk) 04:54, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

@138.192.90.232: I am following up in your user Talk page. Thanks.

 Done Historiador (talk) 05:09, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, This is Ashwini artist manager of sonu gowda I edited it because her film producers insisted not to show her personal life as it might affect her personal life so please I sincerely request you to allow the above changes n help the artist career Thanking you, Yours obedient Ashwini Ashwinilohit (talk) 05:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

@Ashwinilohit: Thanks for writing. Please, let's continue the conversation in your Talk Page.

 Done Historiador (talk) 06:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Please kindly allow the changes for Sonu gowda personal life Thank you, historian Ashwinilohit (talk) 05:43, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

@Ashwinilohit: Thanks for writing. Please, let's continue the conversation in your Talk Page.

 Done Historiador (talk) 06:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Please kindly allow the changes for Sonu gowda' personal life as it might affect her career please Thank you historian Ashwinilohit (talk) 05:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

@Ashwinilohit: Thanks for writing. Please, let's continue the conversation in your Talk Page.

 Done Historiador (talk) 06:12, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Moved to this section Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 12:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Tito Dutta (talk) 17:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

The source for the goals is the page itself, it says 276 goals in his club career and 24 goals in his international career, so that's how i came to the 300 goals number. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.83.197.240 (talk) 19:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for explaining. I undid my own revert and allowed your contribution to the article.

 Done Historiador (talk) 19:59, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

I did not add any new information, the 2/14th's article itself says they are armoured reconnaissance, and there is no reason for an article link to say "australian version of lav 25" when the link provided links directly to the aslav. Not to mention the ASLAV is not based on the LAV-25 in the first place.

--156.57.152.43 (talk) 20:30, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

156.57.152.43 Welcome to Wikipedia. Thanks or the explanation. I returned the article to your contribution. In the future, please, explain your changes in the comments section.  Done Historiador (talk) 20:43, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately, your routing tool has falsely identified my edit on Kiernan Shipka as a test or vandalism. The article refers to Kiernan's post-Mad Men acting - I repeat, acting - as post-production. Post-production refers to editing, sound editing, color correction, distribution, and so forth, and not acting, which is purely a production activity. Further, any reference to post-production experience in regards to Shipka is highly inaccurate - she has only acted and performed music. My edit, as originally made, is correct, and the former version, as well as the subsequent reversion, is both incorrect and confusing. The sooner it can be corrected again, the sooner the issue can be settled. --140.192.108.187 (talk) 21:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I explained myself in your Talk page.  Done Historiador (talk) 21:25, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't have a username by the way, I just edit pages when I see things I don't think are correct or need adding. I re-watched the episode today that the article concerns and I noticed on the synopsis a segment is written in the wrong point in the article. It mentions that the Doctor realised the castle and the Veil are made to scare him, which is correct, but it is written in the article at the point when he first sees them. However his realisation doesn't occur until he jumps out of a window, dries off and has time alone to collect his thoughts. I felt this was worth altering as though this point is maybe of little significance, it is in the wrong place nonetheless

Thanks alot for your message by the way Cabellero1967 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.73.242 (talk) 21:22, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

79.75.73.242:

Hello, and thank you for lending your time to help improve Wikipedia! If you are interested in editing more often, I suggest you create an account to gain additional privileges. Happy editing! Just fixed it.  Done Historiador (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Caballero1967, I found this image of Joseph Balthazar Inginac [1] on this nifty awesome website I came across . Can we use it?? It may old enough to use as public domain. Savvyjack23 (talk) 21:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

@Savvyjack23: Thanks! :) I should go back and mantain the site. I am glad you are trying to improve these people's pages in WP. I would have to give you the exact page location in Beaubrun Ardouin's book later. Figeroa also uses the same pic here. If you can't find the location on your own, you can still upload it to Wikimedia and specify you will provide page number later, but it is definitively out of copyright. Cheers, Historiador (talk) 22:44, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Terrific, thanks! Yes there is just a giant hole in this section of the Caribbean, that have information essentially buried in the eyes of the common reader. It needs to be found and presented. In turn, the dots will all begin to connect with nearby countries and islands etc.. Far too long has Caribbean history in general have been neglected or misconstrued. This region was the beginning of the 'New World.' There have been more wars here and changes of sovereignty than any other part of the Western Hemisphere. Anyway (post-rant), I look forward to receiving that from you. Cheers! Savvyjack23 (talk) 23:00, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

@Savvyjack23: I have not forgotten about Inginac's pic. I just need to be back in that specific research project to find the location. Cheers. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 11:31, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Caballero1967,

I received a message that you undid a change in my edit regarding decimal representation of real numbers. Could you explain this step?

Look, the article gives two examples of decimal representations: the finite representations, and the periodic ones.

My edit added a line that said that those two examples together define exactly the rational numbers.

Isn't this a fitting remark? Any reason why you threw it out?

Cheers,

                            Markus  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.91.80.215 (talk) 23:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC) 

Markus, thanks for writing. Let's continue talking in your Talk page

talk.  Done Historiador (talk) 23:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Andy Dingley. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Stirling engine‎ without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Do not remove SOURCED content from articles. There is a reference right next to this. READ IT. Now go and restore it. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

The problem is in the way you added the information. See  Done Historiador (talk) 12:18, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

@Andy Dingley: Curious: "User:Andy Dingley reported by User:Caballero1967." Next time, checking the order of names and a visit to the Edit Warring page may just change the course of the day, for good. The (3RR) should be bright enough for all, if we count correctly. Historiador (talk) 22:58, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

At last, it is  Done! Historiador (talk 05:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, Historiador. I think you left the wrong message at this anon user talk page. The edit was the removal of a full-stop, and you complained that he didn't cite it ;-] --Slashme (talk) 19:45, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

@Slashme: It was a strange and wrong message, indeed. A question about the removal of a full stop was what I meant to send. Thanks for pointing it out. I took care of it. Cheers.  Done Historiador (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

2001:558:6033:11C:781F:1345:444E:BF73 (talk) 17:56, 4 December 2015 (UTC) The reason I changed it was because 3-D Man is Triathlon and it wouldn't make sense for two info boxes about the same character to be there in the Marvel Comics section of the List of Black Superheroes wiki page.

@2001:558:6033:11C:781F:1345:444E:BF73: Thanks for letting me know. Let's talk in your Talk Page. Cheers.

 Done Historiador (talk) 18:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

2001:558:6033:11C:781F:1345:444E:BF73 (talk) 18:12, 4 December 2015 (UTC) Thanks.

I didn't mean any vandalism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.60.230 (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

67.83.60.230 Thanks for your message. Let's talk in your talk page. Cheers.

 Done Historiador (talk) 19:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Effecting the least fix to Wikipedia is a fool's errand.

What need is there for a reliable source? How about the common sense of an Icelandic dictionary?

It's interesting that, if I find "2 +2 = 5" in a Wikipedia article and fix it, some administrator complains. The enforcement is uneven and capricious. And you have the chutzpah to expect financial contributions to underwrite this junk? 73.46.127.40 (talk) 00:14, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

@73.46.127.40: Would you press here, please? Cheers, Historiador (talk) 03:04, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

 Done Historiador (talk) 16:41, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Diamond Multimedia is a subsidiary of TUL if you look on this website.(http://www.tul.com.tw/global/about_tul_glance.aspx). You can see that TUL has a subsidiary somewhere in California, the same as Diamond Multimedia (http://www.diamondmm.com/about-diamond-multimedia.html). Other companies also correspond with these blue dots: Club3D in the Netherlands, Powercolor in Taiwan and in China and VTX3D somewhere in Russia. (If you go to vtx3d.com, you have to choose a language: Global, Turkish, Polish or Russian. You can assume that it mostly serves these markets). Also this (http://linustechtips.com/main/topic/65852-does-diamond-multimedia-make-good-gpus/). Here a user said: 'Diamond Multimedia, Powercolour, VTX3D & Club 3D are all subsidiaries of TUL Corporation.' I know it's a user and not a reliable source, but it's just someone sharing the same point of view. The problem is that the TUL Corporation has a complex brand system and is pretty unclear about which brands they currently own. Information about them is quite scarce, but from these findings I would conclude that Diamond Multimedia, Powercolour, VTX3D and Club3D are all subsidiaries of the TUL Corporation. Rogonoc (talk) 10:32, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

@Rogonoc: Check in your Talk Page for my response. Thanks for taking the time to explain. Cheers, Historiador (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

 Done Historiador (talk) 10:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

A couple of days ago you removed my edit from the bottom of the steam turbine page where I mentioned that the Wasp class still uses conventionally powered steam turbines, and the article clearly states that the U.S. Navy does not do that anymore. The article mentioned earlier on that the Wasp class still uses them and it's widely known public information. So please, in the future, please make sure the edits you remove are not actual real information and that the articles don't become hypocritical because of it. Sincerely-a member of the U.S. Navy who knows his shit.

@Jayhawk95: Thanks for your feedback. I just left you a message in your talk page.

 Done Historiador (talk) 20:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Caballero- Do you speak Dutch? Why did you edit out my update to the film "Spetters?" Jij bent een echte klootzak. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.74.69.255 (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

@66.74.69.255:66.74.69.255 (talk) As a matter of fact, I do read some Dutch, but that is not the issue here. Please, follow me to your talk page. Historiador (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

 Done Historiador (talk) 23:42, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

dear sir

u may go through the sanskrit grammer and read mahat dhatu — Preceding unsigned comment added by MK Mahato (talk • contribs) 09:07, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

@MK Mahato:, I appreciate your interest in contributing to Wikipedia. Please, follow me back to your Talk Page for some pointers. Cheers.

 Done Historiador (talk) 09:44, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for undoing vandalism to Srivastava. Just a suggestion for you: it's worth checking the page history in such cases, as the preceding edits are often also vandalism. Keep up the good work! – Fayenatic London 09:20, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

@Fayenatic london: you are correct; I often can tell. That page was a bit strange with a history dotted with many IP users. I returned and tried my best. Thanks for the tip and lift. Cheers,

 Done Historiador (talk) 10:01, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

please re-revert to my edit. the previous rendition was, grammatically speaking, utterly awful. the content I removed were either irrelevant or repetitious, and moreover invariably uncited. 2602:306:CDF4:62E0:214:51FF:FEE8:1435 (talk) 16:26, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for writing. I left you a message in your Talk Page: (talk)

 Done Historiador (talk) 16:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

with the exception of one thing I did not remove any information. Not one thing i removed was sourced. if you take the time to examine my edits, i simply removed information that was repetitious. If you look, for example, at the Completely Unsourced paragraph about the alleged xiongnu origins of the Kim family--which i am a believer of--they are simply the same statements repeated again and again. the section following immediately thereafter states that jin midi or kim il ji was of xiongnu origin. while jin midi might have been an ancestor to the silla royal house, jin himself was not a member of the uiseong clan, but probably an ancestor of most of the other clans already mentioned. the aforementioned reference to xiongnu origins were quite adequate. The other bit of information i removed was in the first introductory paragraph where it states that kim means 'dried seaweed' in korean, while in chinese it means 'gold'. This is flatly false. Kim in fact means gold in both languages chinese or korean - it is simply pronounced differently depending on the context of its usage. If you feel that the content that i dropped merits retention, feel free to bring it back. Please do not, however, revert the entire article to the poorly written state it was in. 2602:306:CDF4:62E0:214:51FF:FEE8:1435 (talk) 16:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

@2602:306:CDF4:62E0:214:51FF:FEE8:1435: Thanks for the explanation! It helps a lot. Read it several times, and since I was not sure, I left a message in the article's Talk Page. It would be better if you could provide this same info in the section I opened there. Every time you add or remove info from an article without explanation, flags come out. Furthermore, by sourcing your data and leaving an explanation in Talk Page, you make sure your contributions are not remove that quickly, and others may benefit from it. Again, Thanks. Cheers,  Done Historiador (talk) 16:54, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Moved to this section Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 13:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Please see this result. Neither you nor the other party broke the WP:3RR so no action was required. But while I'm here, could I suggest that you might rename your account? You are signing yourself as Historiador, which is not your account name. Why not request at WP:CHU/S that your account be renamed? The user name Historiador is available and you could take it. All of your records will transfer over if you do so. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 05:28, 9 December 2015 (UTC)  Done Marking as done to close the case here in my user page. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 11:29, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Alfarb page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

 Done Fixed by another user. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 11:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited San Juan Bay, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages San Juan and Ponce de León. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 12 December 2015 (UTC)  Done

Hello Cabalero1967

I edited the Fish Hoek page and am a little unsure what is actually expected. I grew up in Fish Hoek. Went to nursery school at Mrs Hamilton's and then St Imelda's. I lived in 13th Ave opposite the Soccer Fields, before the new school was built. and knew female Navy personnel who lived in the Homestead. During the 1970's, it was common knowledge that all the sports clubs in Fish Hoek sold alcohol as did some of the restaurants. The Homestead was slightly different as the bar was available to the Swans and their guests. The general consensus at the time was that it was probable that more alcohol was being consumed in Fish Hoek, than the surrounding towns, despite the prohibition. Anybody growing up in Fish Hoek a the time would agree. I for one enjoyed many an evening drinking in the sports clubs, the Homestead and some of the restaurants. Therein lay the irony of the situation, something that deserves a mention.

In terms of a citation, I am the source. These are my memories. There is nothing else I can refer to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalkhoek (talk • contribs) 18:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

@Kalkhoek: yours was a difficult one to revert. Ours is just an attempt to keep WP as referred as possible, and I would prefer having all your information here even without sources rather than having none. In cases like yours, I suggest that you re-include the info it, wording it in a less casual manner, include an edits summary, and follow it up with explanatory comments in the article's Talk Page. Thanks so much for your contribution and for the feedback here. Cheers,  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 18:27, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

To whom it may concern,

I am writing in response to you reverting my decision to edit the Captain of England to 'Vacant' from Chris Robshaw.

If you were a true Rugby fan, and in this case, a credible editor, you would have stood by my recent edit. I find it incredibly dissapointing and it is most frustrasting that you chose to revert my edit back to the former England captain Chris Robshaw. You will be in no doubt aware that the Incumbant Coach Eddie Jones has dropped him as Captain and his successor has yet to be announced. I therefore find it very hard to understand why you would disregard my edit and refert it back to how it was, as my edit was in the Interest of Rugby fans as well as everyone who has the right to read the page.

I would therefore invite you to offer clarification on the issue, and how it wasn't "constructive" enough. I do hope this can shed some light on the situation — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.191.227 (talk) 20:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

@86.139.191.227: thanks for responding. I really appreciate it. The reason for the revert, as explained in the message I left in your Talk Page, is simply that there was no explanation, neither in the edit summary nor in the article's Talk page. A source to the news about the change would have also helped. My work as a volunteer is to simply catch changes inserted in WP that are not explained nor are sourced, and if they are still correct, to invited you to return to the article and re-include the info with either an explanation or a source. Keep in mind that thousands of edits enter WP every hour and only a handful of individuals are patrolling them. So, we cannot all be experts in each topic, but we can ask contributors to provide explanations or sources. I just undid my own revert, and the information you included is back on the page. Thanks again. Cheers,  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 20:58, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I am a student at the University of Tuebingen and my task was to shorten the article without losing the meaning. This is why I didn't add any sources, because I only edited the text.

Is there any chance you could accept the changes? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.70.14.163 (talk) 23:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

@141.70.14.163:, Thanks for the explanation. Please, go back to the article and see that I reverted it back to your edits. Thanks for your contributions. --  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 01:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

What do you want me to say? Well done, nice job! Maybe you'll get to CEO of Wikipedia Inc. someday! — Orlando F (talk) 12:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

@Orlando F:, an explanation would make a difference, Orlando F. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

In the game against the giants fozzy rushed for two yards. Do you have those yards? And If not: I'm sorry. LeonardoArnold (talk) 23:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

LeonardoArnold, Thanks for responding and writing. I removed the change because it had no explanation or source, and because when I consulted the pro-reference, it sustained the number the WP article had already. But I am not an expert. I just responded to a potential vandalism flag (triggered often by changes without explanation or sources). And I am more than willing to heed your thoughts. Perhaps the source previous editors and I have consulted is not reliable or mistaken. Please, help us make this article better by providing a better source. Thanks.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 08:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I know you changed my edits on the article, "Adolescence". My age span was defined by the World Health Organization and preteens also have their peers and are growing up. How should I change it maybe or anything? Thanks. Boogsiedowa (talk) 13:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

@Boogsiedowa: Thanks for your contributions and contacting me. I did change them all, but only noticed your source in the last of your edits. And you mentioned it in the text without a link or a proper citation. Now, your changes seem legitimate to me, but if you give me the source, I can restore your input and cite them properly. You can also do it on your own by following instructions here and here. Let me know. Cheers Caballero/Historiador (talk) 14:02, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Boogsiedowa (talk · contribs), there are different definitions of adolescence and the age range is somewhat debatable, which the lead (introduction) of the Adolescence article makes clear. Despite this, the lead also makes it clear that adolescence is most commonly associated with the teenage years. Because of all of this, we should not be putting the specified age range of 10-19 in the lead. Similar goes for your changes to the Preadolescence article; you should not be changing sourced material to unsourced material...as you did there. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 14:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Flyer22 thanks for the useful information. Please, @Boogsiedowa:, let us know if you want to contribute in any other way and if have questions. Cheers,  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 14:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your suggestions. Look forward to edit, add and help more for wikipedia. Do keep me informed of anything that I can do for wikipedia. Omegic (talk) 14:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

It depends much on your interest and strengths. In many ways, this is a community of learners and the way you deal with others is often more important than your skills and knowledge. Do not hesitate to contact for questions and comments.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 11:19, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Correcting a spelling error isn't constructive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.22.172.210 (talk) 08:06, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

@73.22.172.210:Thanks so much for alerting me. I just left a message in your Talk Page.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Afro-Dominicans (Dominican Republic), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caribs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks.  Done. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 11:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I was wondering why you removed a recent addition I made (I was not logged in as I was using my work computer) to the article History of the Jews in Bahrain. in your message you said you felt the addition was not constructive. The King of Bahrain inviting a Rabbi with official standing to the country for a government sanctioned Jewish religious ceremony is a major development in Jewish relations with the kingdom. Why would it not be appropriate (or to use your word, "constructive") to include it in the "Modern Times" section of the article?

Thanks,

Mulecorps — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mulecorps (talk • contribs) 16:52, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

@Mulecorps: Thanks for writing back. I left a message on your Talk Page.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 17:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

@Caballero1967 Thank you for your response, and I appreciate the help. I've been trying to contribute more to Wikipedia, especially in articles pertaining to Israel and modern Judaism (as this is my specialty). Was it a problem with my citation that made my edit appear as vandalism? I would like to revert the edit, but would appreciate any suggestions for how to improve it as to not create confusion again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mulecorps (talk • contribs) 18:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Mulecorps I am super glad that you are contributing to WP. We need more scholarly type of interventions. Regarding your two IP contributions, if you look at them again [2] you will see that the combination of no explanation and the elimination of a chunk of text (which included sources) is what triggered the vandalism flag. I just checked the reliability of the source you suggested and it seems fine, but while you included one source, you deleted other four. Perhaps it was by mistake.

The citation guidelines are useful (tutorial), and if you have questions about the reliability of the sources, you can check here. There is even a noticeboard where you can consult others about the sources or take a source-debate to more experienced editors (here). For citing, I like using a wiki gadget called ProveIt, which you can activate in your User Preferences. It makes citing much easier (there is a bug with the dating, I think). Please, let me know if this was useful. Learning even the basic steps is often daunting, particularly for people coming from the Humanities with little tech experience. But perhaps you are more comfortable in this environment. Cheers, Caballero/Historiador (talk) 18:31, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

I made this edit because in Russian Wikipedia lieutenant Rzhevsky has a name Dmitry.37.215.85.0 (talk) 13:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

@37.215.85.0: Thanks for letting me know. Provide an explanation and a source with all your Wikipedia contributions, please.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 13:36, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

I received a message indicating that you changed an entry on Stoughton, MA that I recently edited. I am going to change it back. I am the Technology Trainer at O'Donnell Middle School, in Stoughton, and am using it as part of a lesson. Please be assured that I will revert the page back to its original entry once I have finished with all my class this afternoon. Russ Clough — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oms tech (talk • contribs) 13:41, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

@Oms tech: Thanks for letting me know. Took care of the issue and left a note in your Talk Page.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 13:48, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

There is a slight mistake in the Rugby section. The first rugby tour was to Ireland in 1970. I (Selwyn Fernandes) happened to captain the side and we were the forerunners of the rugby teams as it was previously a football school. We played under Pete Coyne and Tom Hartigan Vice Head later).We played St Joe's Academy and a Regional Munster side, winning both games. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selferns (talk • contribs) 16:04, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

@Selferns: Thanks for letting me know. As long as you can explain your changes, and if possible produce an evidence (citation), your additions would be welcome. Thanks.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 16:12, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

I would have thought that the School would have records. I have some photos of the team, Would that suffice? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Selferns (talk • contribs) 16:23, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

@Selferns: The best is to find some kind of written evidence, but if there is none you can muster, you can open a section in the article's Talk Page and explain the changes. If the pics are yours, or if they are given for Wikipedia's use you can follow the instructions to upload them here. I can help you with both steps if you need me to. Thanks again. Cheers, Caballero/Historiador (talk) 16:32, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Earlier, my friend went on my account and started adding incorrect names such as Ms Slobby, I go to this school and know the correct names. So I changed it and you deleted my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnonymousSlang (talk • contribs) 21:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

@AnonymousSlang: Could you re-explain and offer links? Thanks. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 10:54, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

I've created a new page and I would be very grateful for your help: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martha_Ellen_Davis_(ethnomusicologist). — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Great iShuffle (talk • contribs) 22:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for inviting me.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 02:39, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the message. It was very helpful. 73.240.200.103 (talk) 08:52, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

You welcome. Hope to hear of your constructed contributions soon.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 02:45, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Moved to this section Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 13:06, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

It's very nice of you sending me the gift card during this critical moment of my life. Thank you again for devoting time and energy to the publishing of those barnstars, merry christmas and happy new year! Ueutyi (talk) 10:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

I am a native of Balochistan and Zahedan, I changed the article because some of the information are false but there's no source on the Internet that I could use to support my changes. Amirov1234567890 (talk) 13:50, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@Amirov1234567890: As I explained in your Talk Page, your account seems made for a single purpose WP:SPA. You should change your editing practices if you want to make genuine contributions to WP. If you have difficulties in finding sources for your claims, bring it up in the articles' talk pages and ask for help to sustain them. But you cannot simply remove and add content WP without regard of evidence and consensus.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 10:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Caballero, I updated the GDP wiki pages some time ago to replace a wrong definition of GDP by the OECD / World Bank definition. I wonder why you think your new definition is superior to OECD. Is there a citation for your new definition? Is it identical to the OECD definition? Why does it not specify 'resident production units (the main meaning of the GDP in GDP which distinguishes it from GNP)

I also think the opening paragraphs should be for non-economists and should clearly and quickly address the principal misconception about GDP which is that it is a 'top-line revenue' total (as you say GO is, a useful addition to the article). With an example. Regards, Hugh Small Hugh Small 14:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugh Small (talk • contribs)

@Hugh Small:, Thanks for writing. I actually made a different revert (which was mistaken too, and I already undid it). I did not touch the numbers. Look again: GDP .  DoneCaballero/Historiador (talk) 10:31, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Moved to this section Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 13:07, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I corrected a misspelling of Intelligence Bureau's Indian name. khūphiyā vibhāg- that would be the Hindi or other derived languages version of the original Sanskrit name. what exactly is the problem with it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.184.112.29 (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@73.184.112.29: Thanks. The problem was that you provided no explanation. Look again in the article's history and should notice I took it back to your change: Intelligence_Bureau_(India). Thanks.  DoneCaballero/Historiador (talk) 10:38, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

The spelling in Devanagari script vi-bhaa-ga. you can go to google translate and type in ग to get a transliteration, it will be -ga. Now granted the Hindi/other Indo-Aryan language pronunciation of the word is '-g' but it is not a Hindi word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.184.112.29 (talk) 16:41, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Crime lord

Lets go: http://gordonua.com/news/politics/Zahvat-zdaniya-Ukrtansnafty-Video--72033.html http://rian.com.ua/video/20150320/365048473.html 42700 video results

http://finance.bigmir.net/news/companies/51922-Vtorjenie-na-Odesskii-NPZ-opyblikovano-video-zahvata https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O29eJ9c0GN4 2670 video results

http://www.businessinsider.com/r-special-report-ukraine-struggles-to-control-maverick-battalions-2015-7?IR=T https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U483vkT5tJA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1DnQsyMBe4o

And so on. Oh, no, he is a regular business man with private army as large as a state army.87.79.230.30 (talk) 21:13, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@87.79.230.30: Thanks for writing. Unless you find consensus among the editors working with the article, you would continue having your edits marked as vandalism or unsourced material.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 10:53, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Caballero1967. Just wanted to let you know that I reverted your recent edit to The Son of Neptune. Yours undid an edit by an IP that corrected a character name (name was first Luna --> Lupa --> back to Luna). The character in question is actually named Lupa, and that is now the name listed in the article. Thanks for your edit, in any case; there is a lot of vandalism on that page, and this was the first case I've ever seen of a mixup like this. Happy editing, -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 21:24, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

@2ReinreB2: Thanks for letting me know.  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 10:44, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for the delayed response, but I also wish you a belated Merry Christmas and may this coming New Year fill you and your loved ones with a lots of blessings. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Marine 69-71 You were on time, Tony. Thanks! Caballero/Historiador (talk) 10:46, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Thalassaxeno. Caballero1967, thanks for creating Andrés Jiménez, "el Jíbaro"!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. As you are writing an extensive article on a living person, extensive sources are required. Otherwise, you've done excellent work on this page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. --"Forsan et haec olim meminisse iuvabit" -Aeneid, Book I, Line 203 (talk) 07:42, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

@Thalassaxeno:, thanks! That was quick. I just submitted the first post and will continue working with it. There is another stub article I just started and I would appreciate if you could visited also: Edwin Colón Zayas. Cheers, Caballero/Historiador (talk) 07:45, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Edwin Colón Zayas, Caballero1967!

Wikipedia editor Thalassaxeno just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This is an excellent page. I'm sorry if I was a bit impatient with your other article, but the work really shows in your detailed entries.

To reply, leave a comment on Thalassaxeno's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thanks! Caballero/Historiador (talk) 07:52, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Just wanted you to know that it was the work of my nine-year old autistic daughter. I think she was trying to say she liked the story or the character....

@StormsWx: Not sure what you mean, but thanks for contacting me. Wish you the best. Caballero/Historiador (talk) 16:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Edwin Colón Zayas

added a link pointing to Folk

Martha Ellen Davis (ethnomusicologist)

added a link pointing to Vodou

Social justice

added a link pointing to Fairness

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! Done  Done Caballero/Historiador (talk) 16:06, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Hiiiii. I just got your message and I'm a tad confused that you reverted it. Her husband was a prince of the blood by birth, they were married in 1685 and thenon she held the rank of a princess of the blood by marriage hence my adding the category. LouisPhilippeCharlesNew (talk) 20:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

LouisPhilippeCharlesNew, thanks for writing back. You have been deleting and adding information in several pages about nobility without producing sources. You also added a non-existing category. To avoid having your edits flagged as vandalism or GF errors, 1) explain them in the Talk Page, 2) produce sources whenever possible, and 3) give a more detailed explanation. If you want to undo my revert, go ahead, but also add sources and explain the changes. I hope this helps. Cheers, Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 21:08, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!

Hello Caballero1967, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Happy editing, Savvyjack23 (talk) 05:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thank you for your own greetings; it was well appreciated!! Savvyjack23 (talk) 05:52, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, user:Savvyjack23. I appreciate it very much. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 08:09, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

There is also a tropical music task force if you are interested, since it encompasses Puerto Rican and Dominican Republic music. Cheers! Erick (talk) 20:49, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

• @Magiciandude: Eric, just signed in. Let me know how could I be of service. Thanks for the effort and for thinking of me. Cheers, Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 14:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi Caballero! Thank you for the barnstar and welcome to the Latin music project! You mentioned on user list that your specialty is history and scholarship, so I'm thinking perhaps you could add helpful sources on the resources page? Take the time to read the project scope if you haven't already and if you have any questions, ask away! Again welcome! Erick (talk) 16:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

• Thanks, Yamaguchi先生. The same with you. Cheers, Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 13:58, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

• Thanks, Rubbish computer. The same with you. Cheers, Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 13:57, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

• Thanks, Ueutyi. The same with you. Cheers, Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 13:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

@Davey2010: Thanks for the good wishes! I hope you are starting your year great too. Cheers, Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 21:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Clarityfiend (talk) 03:50, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

@Clarityfiend: Thanks for the good wishes! Same with you. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 21:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Please do not link to copyright violations, as you did in this edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:01, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

• Just answered in your Talk Page. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 12:29, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the tag update and your input on the article Coconut oil. Through dialog with other editors, third opinion, and listening, I suspect a majority are correct over my position and I wanted to see about trimming some of the tags. I left a message for you on the article's talk page. Basileias (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your good manners and for requesting my view. I just did. Let me know your thoughts and keep me updated, please. Cheers, Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 21:20, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

I'm not an expert on Wikipedia rules, but it looks to me like you've reverted the same good-faith edit four times in a short period. Your revert on my edit suggested that I take the debate to the associated talk page, but you have failed to make any effort to support your edit on that talk page. I think the burden is now on you to to leave the page as it was, without the phrase in question, until you make some case that the edit you propose has merit. Rks13 (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

@Rks13: I am confident you will do well. Please, follow the link to my response. And don't worry, I had not violated any rule. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 22:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Caballero1967 - I got your message re: my recent edit to "Domestic terrorism."

I have to plead not guilty here - I did NOT remove any content that was already there.

What I did do was to ADD several examples to the U.S. domestic terrorism section (i.e., 2002 Los Angeles International Airport shooting, Beltway sniper shootings, 2007 Fort Dix plot, 2010 Times Square car bomb attempt, 2020 Portland car bomb attempt and 2015 Chattanooga shootings). When I looked up the article this morning in order to respond to your message, I was surprised to find that ALL of those entries had been removed for some reason, which puzzles me - if you look at each of the underlying articles which I linked to, it is clear that each one was a valid example of domestic terrorism (i.e., each one happened in the United States and each one was clearly politically motivated). Would it be possible to please put those additions back?

One other thing which I did do was I reversed the order of two existing items on that list in order to put them into a more proper chronological order - I put the D.C. Five, which took place in December of 2009, ahead of Farooque Ahmed, whose incident did not take place till October 2010 (the latter was originally placed above the former, which is out of sequence since everything else is in correct chronological order).

Those are the only changes which I made to the article, and I stand by them as being valid and correct; as I said before, I removed NO existing material.

Thanks

Pdeck2013

Pdeck2013 (talk) 16:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

• @Pdeck2013: Thanks for the explanation. I followed up in your Talk page. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 17:50, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Tito Dutta (talk) 18:10, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi my former IP address is 2601:282:8002:299B:E871:985F:8181:56C and i have turned a new leaf and started to edit good. I have two questions 1) cna you help me on wikipedia and 2) can you help me become an admin?

Thanks, Awsomegamer75795 (talk) 07:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

@Awsomegamer75795:, thanks for the encouraging message. I am glad you have decided to follow a more constructive path. I am not sure about helping you to become an admin (the candidacy is an onerous process, the workload is truly heavy, and the position lends itself for devastating mistakes), but I can try to help you with your contributions to WP as long as they are done in good faith (WP:GF), you read the guidelines and become familiar with the system, and I have the time. Begin with this page, please. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 18:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

On June 6th I edited a misformatted table on the page List of Missiles by Country. You reverted the edit stating that I had not cited any reliable sources. However (1) the source for the misformatted table was already cited in the line directly above it prior to my edit, (2) I did not remove that citation, and (3) I used that same source for the corrected table. This was my first Wikipedia edit, so if I did something wrong please let me know. 71.170.247.36 (talk) 17:26, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

@71.170.247.36: Thanks for the explanation. Please, take a look at the page again. Make sure that everything is the way you think it should be and when making any contribution/change, make sure to provide a full explanation in the edits summary. It would help understand the changes. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 18:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

You recently reverted my changes to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_days_in_Greece and I would like to propose that they are valid and should be restored.

The References section of the page includes a single link, to "Greek Name Days for the Year 2015" (http://www.namedays.gr/index_uk.php). That webpage mentions both of the additions I made. So since that was already an existing reference, I didn't repeat it in my addition. That was probably a mistake on my part, I understand it would have made your job easier and perhaps would have avoided this exchange! :-)

Do you agree that my modification can be restored?

Thank you,

Yannis

@Yannislionis: Thanks for a clear and sound explanation. I agree and will revert my own revert. I would ask you, however, to include such explanations in the edit summaries in future contributions. Thanks, again. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 16:35, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Tito Dutta (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, i see your undo my change, there was a change on president heading of the university, the original text of the message is in french and can be find here [3], thanks. Unsigned: 13:35, January 9, 2016‎ Attori90

@Attori90:, thanks for the explanation and the source. I have looked at it and at the institution's information and it seems you are correct. I will now proceed to re-include your change, but with a slight change in the spelling: the last name only with the first letter capitalized. Thanks. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 15:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

If you do not know Latin nor know anything about palaeography nor medieval manuscripts - and from your reverts I can see you do not - nor you can use Google to verify the misspelled quotation, then I wonder, how can you feel authorised to do the reverts? Regards. 84.40.214.223 (talk) 01:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC) PS. I do not expect an answer, I only expect that you now go to a mirror sometime, look yourself in the eyes, ask youself this question, and contemplate the (obvious) answer. 84.40.214.223 (talk) 01:06, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

@84.40.214.223: How delightful! There is a message in your Talk Page for you here and a follow-up discussion in the article's Talk Page. Continue to spread your love around (WP:IUC). Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 17:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello

You have advised me that you have reverted an edit on the Solicitors Regulatory Authority. Please note that this was nothing to do with me. I have no interest in the SRA, nor have I had any dealings with the firm in Reading (150+ miles from where I live) which was the subject of the edit. I'm not sure how you identified this edit as mine, but it isn't, and your reversion needs to be advised to the correct individual.

Terry White

@94.4.248.173: Terry, thanks for writing. It this were not you, it may mean you share an IP address with others. Notice, please, the message below, which accompanied the one I left in your talk page.

"If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices."

Let me know how can I help. Cheers, Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 12:56, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello, the page was edited to remove false information. It was not a mistake. Thank you.

@Sanziophan:, you should sign all of your comments in Talk pages. Please, refer to the article's Talk Page. You did not offer an explanation (WP:EDS) for deleting well-sourced information. I checked each one of those you deleted, and found them to be correct, at least, according to the sources in the article and beyond. You offered new information and citations, but you should have discussed these big changes in the article's Talk Page, especially if they are sourced. So, as I did before, I invite you to offer your explanations on the article's Talk page and, unless there is a weighty reason, do not delete information in the article that is well-sourced. Unless well-justified, in Wikipedia we prefer a more cautious editing practice, one that acknowledges the work of others. See (WP:EDIT). So, I did revert your revert, but only because you need to justify the deletion of material that I found it to be well-sourced. Otherwise, it is tantamount to vandalism (WP:VAN) or disruptive editing (WP:DE). Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 00:29, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi there,

In reference to your recent message about my edit to Chiwetel Ejiofor's page not being constructive, I'm sure I don't have to advise you that it was a factual edit. He was previously an OBE, but since he was subsequently elevated to a CBE, this 'title' takes precedence over the former OBE and therefore the initials 'CBE' should correctly be suffixed to his name, instead of 'OBE' which it was previously. This is certainly correct and indeed every other British individual that I have looked at who shares such an honours history has been granted this update.

I must say that I do object to my small but correct change being dismissed due apparently to not being "constructive" and subsequently being told that if I want to "experiment" I should use the Sandbox.

Thank you for your patronizing words...

Steve

@5.64.182.198: Steve: Thanks for writing and calling my attention to this error. The words were not intended to patronize. Sorry. It is always helpful to include a summary and a reference with your edits. I fixed the article and included a source to support your change. Look here. Thanks again for your contribution. Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 23:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your response. I was not aware of the edit summary thing. But none of the Feluda story mentions as to what school he studied. I am not sure what made you think his alma mater was Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. I would be pleased if could provide with a reference or in absence of such evidences, remove the details of his alma mater.

@103.252.164.134: Thanks for your reply. I left a comment in the article's Talk Page that you should follow up with. I suggest you look into the article's history for the user/editor who included that info in the article, and start from there. Let me know how else to help. Cheers, Caballero//Historiador ^☊ 12:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)