User talk:BriLila

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric Dinowitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Dinowitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:48, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BriLila. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Anarchyte (talk) 06:22, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That chart is way more useful than the list it replaced. I suggest you have another look. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.55.51.131 (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@68.55.51.131: Thank you for informing me on your edit intentions. I apologize for the mistaken revert. Happy editing! -BriLila (talk) 20:07, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fakirerpool won the Championship League by winning the last match of the league, so no title for any Saif Coach. [1] 45.250.228.203 (talk) 06:39, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reaching out and letting me know what your intentions were with your edit to Saif Sporting Club. I reverted your edit as you removed content without explaining why, so in accordance with the message I left on your talk page- remember to add edit summaries when you edit. -BriLila (talk) 14:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, just a note on date format use, as per your revert summary at Rat (zodiac). This is not governed by WP:NPOV but WP:DATEVAR, which states that either format is fine for the large majority of cases, the person who first uses it in an article gets to choose, and it should afterwards not be changed without very good reason. You were correct to revert here based on Spinningrat changing the date format from the established version, but NOT because "BC" could/should not be used in this article at all. Just to prevent future confusion :) Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 11:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know about this, I appreciate it. I'll definitely keep WP:DATEVAR in mind for future reference. Have a good one :) -BriLila (t • c) 11:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]