User talk:BMA-Nation2020/Archive 2

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of Illumination productions. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Indagate (talk) 20:05, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. You made an edit, it got reverted, and now it's getting discussed on the talkpage. Continuing to reinstate your preferred version of a table - and you're at four now - is edit warring. I am going to restore status quo one more time, and I strongly suggest you leave it until the discussion is finalized. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 20:47, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Indagate (talk) 20:57, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 177.170.77.150 (talk) 23:21, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at List of Illumination productions. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 00:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Coming off a 48 hr block and immediately returning to your edit warring does not look good. If this does not stop I will block you indefinitely. Ad Orientem (talk) 13:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember what User:NekoKatsun told you earlier in the discussion about the table for List of Illumination productions, "this is Wikipedia, which is a collaborative venture. You don't get to unilaterally decide if something is "final" or not, and that sort of mindset isn't helpful to collaboration." The wording you use in your comments and edit summaries suggest WP:OWNERSHIP and it could land you a block under WP:NOTHERE if you continue to push this mindset in your editing. I hope we do not reach these levels -Gouleg🛋️ ^harass/_hound 14:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Justiyaya 00:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about templating but yeah please remember to use an edit summary :D Justiyaya 00:06, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i know how it works. i just wanting to adjust a few things. i use it when i have problems. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 00:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Skydance Media into Draft:Skydance Animation. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i know but i'm just mkaing that to make sure it gets a page of it's on. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 22:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You made an edit on Luck page that its budget was $200 million at maximum:

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Luck_%282022_film%29&type=revision&diff=1102967512&oldid=1102967278

Did you actually have a source for that budget number? 125.240.31.231 (talk) 02:35, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it was from the Skydance Media page. in the Second act ref. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 03:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you can provide that page? 125.240.31.231 (talk) 11:53, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t know. Someone else put it there. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Skydance_Media&diff=next&oldid=1102831567 Here this is what i found before i realized it wasn’t good enough. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 14:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm… it looks like you added back that $200 million budget number. Is there a reason for this? 211.36.148.182 (talk) 23:16, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ask Indagate. Not me. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 00:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Indagate? 211.36.148.182 (talk) 04:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Indagate is a user that works in this wiki. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 04:32, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Luck_(2022_film)#Budget, discussion may be better for the talk page of the article so more people to see and get involved. Thanks, Indagate (talk) 07:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft lacks Reception information, and does not satisfy television notability.

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, please ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement, it will probably be rejected.

There is a history of sockpuppetry associated with this draft. If this draft is resubmitted, please check the history and determine whether the submitter is quacking. If so, please take appropriate action, which may include filing a follow-up sockpuppet investigation.

This does not mean that the topic is not notable, and it does not mean that the topic is notable. If this draft is resubmitted by a neutral good-faith reviewer, it may be reviewed and accepted based on its content and sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Boss Baby: Back in the Crib and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The second source doesn't even mention the subject of the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Mazzaro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BMA-Nation2020! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, reception on Boss Baby: Back in the Crib, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Mazzaro and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 08:56, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Skydance Media, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 22:17, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Actually Strange World is Henry Jackman’s third collaboration with Don Hall, the first is Winnie the Pooh (co-directed by Don Hall) and the second is Big Hero 6 (co-directed by Don Hall). 68.132.16.79 (talk) 23:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, now you tell me! XD BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 23:45, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kingdom Hearts Missing-Link, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

• 1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
• 2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
• 3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Elemental (2023 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:10, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages to Draft:Untitled Skydance/Star Wars video game. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 22:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me BMA-Nation2020,

I'm well-aware of your reverts on any new changes you make to the Skydance Animation page. I care about accuracy on the page. While I may have a missed small details in certain places, I am highly attentive on what I cite and list on my pages. I've gathered that you simply want to the page to stay exactly as it was when you last left it, despite that what I contributed was sourced and correct even if you didn't fully read the sources or just don't like to see change. You seem to know a decent amount about what has been reported about the studio, but it's not fair to neglect mention of any information you don't want mentioned for personal reasons. You also keep reposting false information, such as "Ray Gunn" releasing before "Pookoo", for which there is no source to back this up. The proper etiquette is to list it later since it has been in production for three years fewer, was announced second, and the studio has not announced that it will release "Ray Gunn" before "Pookoo".

I also undo edits when I think I misunderstood, such as the story and screenplay section, which I restored to your version. I am not above correcting my own edits, but I have not seen the same courtesy demonstrated by you. You speak to me like you are an administrator, but judging by your page, you have encountered issues at Wikipedia before. This is my attempt to resolve this with you now, and please know that I have no issue with taking this up to others if this escalates further. If something I write is actually wrong, please correct it as I just stated I can make mistakes, but don't undo the majority correctly sourced information that I worked hours to organize and cite correctly; it is not respectful. I can't say I expect much from this, but I'm going to try.DESERTSCHo0L20 (talk) 05:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hold on. I like the one you made. It’s reasonable. That’s good for now. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 05:08, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry about the situation. I don’t try to make things harder for others; sometimes I just need to make smaller edits at a time. If anything can be condensed, there’s always the talk page, and I’ll keep trying to be updated on the official guidelines. Thanks again.DESERTSCHo0L20 (talk) 05:16, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand but there’s a lot of gaps in between these collums and i don’t want any gaps screwing up. Besides, i haven’t got a single word about Pookoo. If anything happens to Pookoo, Ray Gunn would be third in line due to having a composer being the third announced so far. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 05:19, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be involved in very similar behaviour on Illumination. Why do you keep reverting my edits especially without citing a proper reason? There is absolutely nothing wrong with them. ViperSnake151  Talk  00:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i had source from it. you can't remove it if you have any source of proof. they just announced it. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 00:45, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not remove it. All I did was reword it and move it to a different section of the article. ViperSnake151  Talk  06:58, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at No Escape (2015 film), you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

tell me, is it from Living Films? Cause i found it on the page and i need source from it. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 03:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Pixar films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Silverman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fubar (upcoming TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 10:58, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing the writers from the Paws of Fury infobox, especially without any explanation. The infobox should reflect the onscreen credits, and not what you may think is "correct." Thanks. Trivialist (talk) 20:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i did have an explanation in the talk page. this is a mistake. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 20:22, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you really think that somehow the WGA and the producers made a mistake, and no one noticed except for you? Writing credits for productions covered by the WGA are not awarded casually. They have a long manual about how film credits are determined. Go to that page and search for the word "arbitration" to see the sort of detail they go into.

The credits reflect who wrote the script that was used, whether or not they were involved in the specific production.

The infobox and article should reflect the credits on the final film, not what you think is "correct." Trivialist (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i'm okay with the producers and the directors. it's just... i'm highly autistic over things that are not right. i wanna fix mistakes but people doesn't understand me like Talk:List of Illumination productions. i don't want things to go badly for who i am. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize; I may have been a bit of a jerk.

Screenwriting credits are unusual because, unlike directing or producing credit, it's possible for someone to write a script, sell it, and have absolutely nothing to do with the subsequent production, or for the script to be re-used.

If you can, think of writing credits as being like "architect" or "designer" credits. The Blazing Saddles writers weren't involved in the construction of this "building," but their blueprints were used, so they are entitled to credit for that. This doesn't happen often, so I am certain that the WGA took a careful look at things before awarding the credits they way they did. Trivialist (talk) 22:19, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

they weren't doing a good job on making it based on a film. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 22:21, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kingdom Hearts Missing-Link".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spy Kids: Armageddon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 19:45, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Archangel (2017 video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 14:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tol were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PWND and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 16:35, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PWND and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:17, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Archangel (2017 video game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Walking Dead: Saints & Sinners – Chapter Retribution, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OceanHok (talk) 03:46, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Boss Baby: Back in the Crib, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:34, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abominable and the Invisible City and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 01:14, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 2: Mission Unpluckable, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 3: The Furball Strikes Back, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 4: Attack of the Zittens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 5: Intergalactic Gas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 6: Alien vs. Bad Guys, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 7: Do-You-Think-He-Sarus?, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 8: Superbad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 9: The Big Bad Wolf, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 10: The Baddest Day Ever, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 11: Dawn of the Underlord, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 12: The One?!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 13: Cut to the Chase, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Bad Guys: Episode 14: They're Bee-Hind You!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Rivals, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

echidnaLives - talk - edits 00:34, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spirit: Lucky's Big Adventure, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There's just not enough independent coverage. The sole new source is an interview-based primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PWND and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 08:30, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zootopia+, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jennifer Lee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thatguy1987 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blush (2021 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thatguy1987 (talk) 18:35, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blush (2021 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:41, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Blush (2021 film) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Bennv123 (talk) 18:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i understand the situation. i reworked it over the story so people would try to make the plot themselves. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:58, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Your explanation is kind of hard to understand. However, you cannot put copyrighted material into an article -- no matter what kind of explanation you give. I see that you are heavily invested in seeing articles look a certain way. In a few cases here on your talk page, experienced editors have said that no one is allowed to do XYZ. If you reply with a reason, that doesn't make it ok.

For example, above for "Draft:Skydance Animation", you were told that copying within Wikipedia without attribution is not allowed. Your answer was "i know but i'm just mkaing that to make sure it gets a page of it's on". That doesn't matter: it's still true that copying within Wikipedia without attribution is not allowed. Your reasoning doesn't make it OK.

And here in this section, saying so people would try to make the plot themselves does not make it OK to insert copyrighted material. Please keep this in mind, and please don't insert copyrighted material, no matter what your reasoning is. Thanks, and happy editing. David10244 (talk) 02:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my god! Can people stop complaining about my actions for one minute?! I know my actions but it’s for a good cause. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 02:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BMA-Nation2020. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:BMA-Nation2020. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=BMA-Nation2020|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 20:48, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Bad Guys (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Tube·of·Light 02:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i was only cleaning it up. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 02:23, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing information from the lede is not equivalent to cleaning it up. You removed the sentence about who composed the music, and said that the movie was influenced by Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse but removed the fact that it was also influenced by 4 other franchises. That is basically retaining some information while removing other relevant information. Tube·of·Light 08:37, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But the rest of that information is in the production section. Discuss this in the talk page of the article, please BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 08:42, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

• 1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
• 2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
• 3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Untitled Nike film and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 09:11, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by VersaceSpace was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PWND and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—VersaceSpace (talk) 02:50, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Twitter and Youtube are not reliable sources. I suggest waiting for reviews/awards/etc to come out to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bendy and the Dark Revival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 23:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Clearly not notable at this point. May or may not become notable when it has been released.

bonadea contributions talk 00:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Skydance Media. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, Skydance Media. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:Skydance Media.

Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.

Divisions of parent companies that have articles usually do not qualify for separate articles. Please discuss, on the parent company article talk page, whether this division is separately notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skydance Interactive and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 02:19, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Skydance Media. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is a draft on a subtopic of an existing article, Skydance Media. Discussion as to whether a separate article for the subtopic is warranted should be on the talk page of the parent article, Talk:Skydance Media.

Please discuss the suitability of creating a separate subtopic article on the talk page of the parent article. Please resubmit this draft if there is rough consensus at the parent talk page to create the child article, or with an explanation that the child draft satisfies either general notability on its own or a special notability guide.

Divisions of parent companies that have articles usually do not qualify for separate articles. Please discuss, on the parent company article talk page, whether this division is separately notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skydance Television and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Captain America / Black Panther video game, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OceanHok (talk) 11:03, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Family Plan. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:54, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Spirit: Lucky's Big Adventure".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

It appears to e WP:TOOSOON. However, additional references in independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Behemoth (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 05:00, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Skydance Media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gabriel Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I agree, it is WP:TOOSOON, requires more WP:SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Behemoth (video game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BMA-Nation2020. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Migration (2023 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Centcom08. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 02:17, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Guardians of the Galaxy Holiday Special, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Centcom08 (talk) 02:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pichemist was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Old Guard (franchise) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_Signed, Pichemist ^{( Contribs | Talk )} 20:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Continues to fail WP:GNG, please do not resubmit unless obvious major new sources appear.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 11:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]