User talk:Noclip

This user may have left Wikipedia. Noclip has not edited Wikipedia since August 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello -- My company is working on a film project about the American Presidents and we were hoping to use this image. I see that it says that it's public domain, but would you be willing to sign a license agreement giving us permission to use it? Thank you very much! I can be reached at katiej@ideaasylum.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.10.122.70 (talk) 19:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to contribute to the discussion about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Films. There's a discussion topic about the subject at the bottom of that page, and that page usually gets more replies than the template's talk page. - Bobet 23:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

so it looks like your wonderful skin isn't going to be used at wikinews, any chance of a general public release? --MateoP 02:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skin file, I will post the CSS if I can dig it up. Noclip 00:56, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would also appreciate it if you could find the css. It looks very intreasting. Bawolff 19:50, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Vildricianus 16:06, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

+2 -- Zanimum 20:02, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

+3 -- [anonymous fan of your theme!] 25 February 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.40.204.157 (talk) 05:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Keep trying at FPC, you'll get one eventually. I am 2/4 so far. -Ravedave

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Liquid Crystal Display Macro Example zoom.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates.

~ Veledan • Talk 23:09, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NoClip, Are you the original author of this resolution chart? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Resolution_chart.svg

I have some questions about this chart, and the description... "It does not accuratly reflect the screen shape (aspect ratio) of these formats, which is always stretched or squeezed to 4:3 or 16:9. The table assumes an average vertical detail loss of .75x due to interlace. The actual loss is variable due to content, motion, opinion on acceptable levels of flicker, and possible success of deinterlacing. 1920x1080i is not included because all common use of 1080i is filtered to 1440 or less."

I don't understand why interlace artifacts are discussed or factored in to this chart. It would seem to be better to reference this as a separate discussion. The resolution of HDTV is identical for interlaced or progressive scan formats for the same signal type (1920x1080 or 1280x720).

I don't understand the justification for the statement "all common use of 1080i is filtered to 1440 or less". 1080i is defined by SMPTE 274M, and is broadcast in the US using ATSC. Neither of these specifications filter the horizontal resolution to 1440. Only HDV uses anamorphic pixels to record 1440x1080 as 1920x1080. Most of the broadcast 1080i material is shot and edited with full 1920x1080 resolution equipment.

This chart has been placed on many different wikipedia pages, and I am interested in working with the author(s) to improve it.

Thank you!

Tom Vaughan Tvaughan1 19:46, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That particular chart is not mine. I tried to replace it but someone else re-replaced it with the current one. Noclip 20:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... the origin remains a mystery! Tvaughan1 18:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update - User:Algr claims to be the author. We're discussing this image on Image_talk:Resolution_chart.svg.

Thanks for helping with the new, improved image. Please see the discussion page... Image_talk:Resolution_chart_(Combined).svg

Thanks for uploading Image:Downtown Washington (Aerial view).jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot identified Image:Downtown Washington (Aerial view).jpg as having no copyright information despite the image having a US Government public domain tag. - Noclip 16:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the bot correctly identified it as having no source, which is not the same thing. --Carnildo 21:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In my sandbox I reworked the article, moving most of the trivia section into a "parodies and references in popular culture section", leaving only three points in trivia. I moved the snake information up under the cast, and somewhat reworked the intro. I also removed the viral videos as well. Look this over and see if there are any other improvements that need to be made, and once that's done, I'll transfer it over to here. --Nehrams2020 00:54, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looking over the reworked version, the main issues have been resolved. While it would pass in this form, my personal recommendation is to get rid of the first two trivia facts completely and to work the third one into the History section. Noclip 02:48, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I transfered it over to the article if you would like to take another look. --Nehrams2020 19:02, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for assisting in the SoaP page and passing it. Can you also take a look at The Blues Brothers? I can work on it further today if there are any necessary improvements. Over at WP:Films, we're trying to improve the quality of articles we produce, and it would be beneficial to broadcast as many GA films as we can for our newsletter within the next week. If you can't, no worries, thanks for helping.--Nehrams2020 19:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Mexican Wolf 2 yfb-edit 1.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Fir0002 07:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note it was Edit 1 which got promoted --Fir0002 07:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noclip,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Mexican Wolf 2 yfb-edit 1.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on April 8, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-04-08. howcheng {chat} 07:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While I'd like to suggest it is all magic and raw talent, I have to give plenty of credit to the fact that I'm shooting with a 13 megapixel camera and high quality lenses, and quite often stitching 5-20 images together which (with up to 50% overlap to ensure that no part of the scene is missed) often resulting in images which are equivalent to about 50-100 megapixels. I usually downsample them by halving the dimensions and the image still typically results in an extremely high resolution image that is far sharper than an image would look straight out of a camera. That said, it all requires quite a lot of time and patience - more than a lot of people would be willing to give! Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 14:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BackupHDDVD GUI Screenshot.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Noclip: I notice you voted "support" for the Hamburg picture. Don't you think you should move your “Support” to the beginning of your paragraph though (and move it hierarchically to the far left), or create a separate "support" vote? Thanks for your two cents to help call those "effete corps of impudent snobs" for what they are: "nattering nabobs of negativism". I loved the "Bah!" part. Like a fine wine, it provided a delicate finish with hints of aloof and dismissive. Greg L 23:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was mostly kidding, but could the 3 guys in black right in front of the front corner of the monument be duplicates? --froth^T 23:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assert that I am User:Noclip on Commons. Noclip 00:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your vote, diff is not according to rules - Alvesgaspar 14:35, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Smithsonian Building NR.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Raven4x4x 06:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! I especially like your very modest nominations statement ("somewhat high detail"). Raven4x4x 06:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noclip,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Smithsonian Building NR.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 20, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-06-20. howcheng {chat} 16:44, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Driver.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Paul Cyr 01:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons has media related to United States Air Force Memorial.

Images such as Image:Air Force Memorial at Night.jpg can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons instead of the English Wikipedia so that all Wikimedia Foundation projects can use it. --Pmsyyz 01:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:White House Rear View 4K.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Noclip. thanks for writing me about the White House north portico image. I may have mispoke. The problem is more focus and clarity. the present picutre is in much better focus and shows more architectural detail. While I liked the appropriate spring time look to your pic it was very milky and did not show much detail. CApitol3 15:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noclip. On my monitor, the image I placed there last night shows much more detail. I can see the dentils in the pediment, and more detail around the wiondows. CApitol3 20:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi (again) Noclip. At that size it looks wonderful! But what do you think when it is in hte size on hte article page? There it seemed less detailed to me. CApitol3 22

24, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm guessing you have abandoned development of the Wikinews custom skin? --Saint-Paddy 19:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. To help streamline an out-of control discussion, I moved your post to another heading here: Talk:Virginia_Tech_massacre#Fatalities_.28Or.2C_do_we_include_the_perp.3F.29. --Dynaflow 03:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Noclip, I almost forgot about it and then your WMATA map nomination reminded me. You are from DC, right? Would you by any chance (if you have an excess of spare time :-) ) be interested in visiting the national archives to digitze a specific picture which they have on file, but of which there is no free high quality reproduction available? I'm talking about the Buchenwald pic from the screwed up nomination a week ago. Just a thought. I don't know the propper procedure yet (whether you'd have to bring your own scanner, if you have to schedule a date, etc.) but I could help work it out if you'd be willing to do the legwork (and fingerwork for that matter :-) ). That is of course only if you really are on location. --Dschwen 22:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Common PD Symbols.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Capitol Building Full View.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for nominating it! KFP (talk | contribs) 23:19, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noclip,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Capitol Building Full View.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on August 21, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-08-21. howcheng {chat} 00:20, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You supported Moby-Dick, which has been selected as the Novels WikiProject's new Collaboration of the Month. Please help improve this article towards featured article standard. :: Kevinalewis : ^{(Talk Page)}/_(Desk) 13:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Runway_diagram.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Selket ^Talk 19:39, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BackupHDDVD_GUI_Screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. Noclip 17:42, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - hope you don't mind, but I've moved {{As-stub}} to {{As-stubclass}}, since it doesn't appear to be a stub template (and certainly hasn't been proposed as one), but more related to a Talk-page style Wikiproject specific assessment scheme, which uses templates with "class" as part of their name, to distinguish them from the WP-wide stubbing scheme. Grutness...wha? 02:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for uploading this. It's definitely a good addition to articles. Though, I just moved it over to commons, and categorized it so it's available for other language projects. I've been trying to keep things organized there. It would help a lot for future images to go directly there, and put in the main category commons:9/11 or appropriate subcategories. Thanks. --Aude (talk) 13:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This form message is being sent to you either due to your membership with WikiProject Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. A new drive has been started requesting that all members review at least one article (or more, if you wish!) within the next two weeks at GAC to help in removing the large backlog. This message is being sent to all members, and even members who have been recently reviewing articles. There are almost 130 members in this project and about 180 articles that currently need to be reviewed. If each member helps to review just one or two articles, the majority of the backlog will be cleared. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the GAC talk page. --Nehrams2020 01:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I'm trying to get input and discussion on my article assessment reform proposal and nobody is discussing it despite being listed at VP and CENT. Noclip 19:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try..WP:RFC..--Cometstyles 19:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

Still nothing. Is there some special way one can suggest things and actually get discussion on them? Noclip 18:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try listing something at Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 19:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've rewritten the Security section of this article. I hope you'll find this version more concise and to-the-point. In my opinion, the History of attacks against Advanced Access Content System article is not really needed and can just be deleted. Do you agree?

What do you think about the new Trivia section (aka. things that I almost think shouldn't be in the article but didn't have the courage to remove)? — Ksero 09:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated that picture for featured picture at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Arlington National Cemetery. Several comments suggested that the color was off, so I uploaded a fixed version. Please feel free to comment. _└^Jared_┘^┌_t^┐  19:26, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:National Cathedral Panorama.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Raven4x4x 08:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and thanks for nominating it. Raven4x4x 08:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noclip,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:National Cathedral Sanctuary Panorama.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on September 23, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-09-23. howcheng {chat} 17:00, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Face Off Mirrors.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was this image created with Hugin? There's a category on Commons, where I've uploaded this image, which I'd like to tag this image with if it's appropriate. grendel|khan 17:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. Interesting... I haven't had a chance to check yet but it would appear that Apple has misused my image if they haven't provided attribution or a copy of the licence terms... I smell a lawsuit.. ;-) I'll check it out properly later today. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 16:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wiki1m.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:32, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A new elimination drive of the backlog at Wikipedia:Good article candidates will take place from the month of July through August 12, 2007. There are currently about 130 articles that need to be reviewed right now. If you are interested in helping with the drive, then please visit Wikipedia:Good article candidates backlog elimination drive and record the articles that you have reviewed. Awards will be given based on the number of reviews completed. Since the potential amount of reviewers may significantly increase, please make sure to add :{{GAReview}} underneath the article you are reviewing to ensure that only one person is reviewing each article. Additionally, the GA criteria may have been modified since your last review, so look over the criteria again to help you to determine if a candidate is GA-worthy. If you have any questions about this drive or the review process, leave a message on the drive's talk page. Please help to eradicate the backlog to cut down on the waiting time for articles to be reviewed.

You have received this message either due to your membership with WikiProject: Good Articles and/or your inclusion on the Wikipedia:Good article candidates/List of reviewers. --Nehrams2020 03:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You swapped Forest Glen and Silver Spring on the map. Otherwise, it's really good. --Jnelson09 03:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When will you make an updated version with the Silver Line ? May I suggest solid for Phase I and dashed for Phase II.

Thanks

AlanfromBigEasy 20:50, 23 July 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.164.76.178 (talk)

Thanks for uploading Image:Plot warning.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:08, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Plot warning.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:20, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WMATA Metro Logo.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:31, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you make the text legible at 250px? Is it K_p or K_m? Should you give the full name of the intermediate keys? Is AES-G3 really the same as decryption? Are sequence keys represented? Should you have arrows to show the flow direction? ←Ben^B4 02:09, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask which camera you are using? --134.155.99.42 21:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Canon EOS 350D with EF 24-85 f3.5-4.5 lens. Noclip 02:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I wanted to let you know that I was planning on using your D.C. capitol building photo in a documentary. It's a great picture and wanted to cite you as a contributor in the end credits. Would you like to be indentified as "Noclip" or by your full name? Also, please email me at erikkai@yahoo.com if you don't mind. Thanks for releasing the image into the public domain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.224.116.54 (talk) 18:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:OpenOffice Windows.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Between December 14, 2005 and June 7, 2007, I vandalized Wikipedia under my previous username (YechielMan) and under various IP addresses and alternate accounts.

I recently reviewed the contribution logs of all the accounts and IP addresses that I can recall having used. My goal was to identify all of the intentionally harmful edits I caused, and to apologize to the individual users who reverted those edits, or warned me, or blocked me.

Hence, I apologize to you and to all of the following users:

Adam Bishop, Amarkov, Antandrus, AntiVandalBot, Bdj (Badlydrawnjeff), Conk 9, CanbekEsen, DLand, Downwards, Eagle 101, Ericbronder, Gogo Dodo, High on a tree, Hut 8.5, Interiot, Jayjg, Jrwallac, Kingboyk, Kuru, Noclip, Patrick Berry, PFHLai, PhantomS, Pollinator, Rachack, Ranma9617, Rx StrangeLove, SlimVirgin, Tfrogner, TommyBoy, Vary, Woohookitty, Zzuuzz, and some anonymous IPs. (I also reverted one edit myself after it went unnoticed for three weeks.)

Thank you for maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia against everyone who has attacked it, including my old self.

If you wish to respond, please do so at my talk page.

Best regards, Shalom (Hello • Peace) 19:26, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Off Soundtrack Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:13, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted Your nomination for featured picture status, Image:Cour Napoléon at night - Louvre.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. MER-C 04:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noclip,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Cour Napoléon at night - Louvre.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on March 27, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-03-27. howcheng {chat} 00:17, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Dark Knight (2008) - Joker.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 03:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As you were a contributor in the last TFD, I am letting you know that {{Maintained}} is again up for deletion. Please review the current version of the template and discuss it at the TFD. Thanks! — BRIAN0918 • 2008-01-30 17:48Z

I noticed that you have participated in Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder ^{(talk) (Contrib)} 00:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I was wondering why the latest revision of your Image:Union Station at Dusk.jpg is the smallest of the three? There is lost detail because of that. Also, what is the difference between the 2.3 MB version and the 2.5 MB version? Thanks. (Someone moved it to Commons but only the latest revision, i.e. the one with least detail). —Wknight94 (talk) 16:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Face Off Hangar.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Face Off Mirrors.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 19:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great shot. Dppowell (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:IE8 Acid3.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:YouTube.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

it would help if you could indicate in what respects you think the KPMG article reads like an advert so that it can be improved. For my part I am reasonably comfortable that there is some good critical information in the history section about law suits against the firm giving some balance to the article Dormskirk (talk) 21:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Image-Resolution chart (Combined).svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Image-Resolution chart (Combined).svg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Image-Resolution chart (Combined).svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 00:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are listed as a GA reviewer. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:29, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi NoClip
Many thanks for the panorama in the National Cathedral
I have used it to illustrate my one-man performance of Spem in Alium
I hope you like the result
Spem in Alium
(improved stereo remix)
Kind regards
David
Dwsolo (talk) 07:25, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:BackupHDDVD output.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:BackupHDDVD-GUI Screenshot.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Plot warning.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:45, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:BackupHDDVD output.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:37, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-software has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Off Soundtrack Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:51, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have placed a request on this image's talk page that someone who knows how to use Photoshop remove the distortion in this image. I'm no expert, but I believe it is called barrel distortion, making the huge stone columns (or whatever the right term is) look bowed rather than straight. The distortion is so pronounced that it detracts from the article on the cathedral rather than enhancing it. Maybe you can make the correction yourself. It is otherwise a lovely image.

I suppose it is possible that there is no distortion in this image, that the columns actually are bowed as they appear, and therefore that the architecture of the cathedral has strong elements of surrealism that are not noted in the article. If that is the case (I have never visited the cathedral, so I do not know), please leave a message on my talk page, and I will undo what I have just done.

Thank you very much.--Jim10701 (talk) 03:41, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to use your image "Runway diagram.png" in a commercial Android application. Could you please state if you give your permission for this? Even if it is in the public domain, commercial use might be restricted so I would like to have your approval... Thank you! Max hi (talk) 20:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BackupBluRay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BackupBluRay (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 10:27, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A featured picture nominated by you is currently nominated for delist and replace. You can find the delist and replace nomination at this link. Bammesk (talk) 03:01, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Union Station No Hedge.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 16:54, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Monument g.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 16:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:White House Front Twilight.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, use File:White House Front Dusk Alternate.jpg instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:02, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Phoenix mission first image (stitched).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:12, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]