User:Fowler&fowler/Muhammad of Ghor

Muhammad of Ghor
Malik Shihabuddin
Muizzuddin
Gold coin of Muhammad of Ghor from Ghazni, for circulation in Central Asia and what is present-day Afghanistan
Sultan of the Ghurid Empire
PredecessorGhiyath al-Din Muhammad
SuccessorGhor: Ghiyath al-Din Mahmud
Ghazni: Taj ad-Din Yildiz
Lahore: Qutbu l-Din Aibak
Bengal: Muhammad bin Bakhtiyar Khilji
Multan: Nasir-ud-Din Qabacha
Reign1173–1203 (with his brother Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad)
Reign1203–1206 (as sole ruler)
Born1144
Ghor, Ghurid Empire (present-day Afghanistan)
Died15 March 1206(1206-03-15) (aged 60–61)
Dhamiak, Jhelum District, Ghurid Empire (present-day Pakistan)
Burial
Ghazna (present-day Afghanistan)
HouseGhurid dynasty
FatherBaha al-Din Sam I
ReligionSunni Islam

Mu'izz ad-Din Muhammad ibn Sam (Persian: معز الدین محمد بن سام), also Mu'izz ad-Din Muhammad Ghori, also Ghūri (Persian: معز الدین محمد غوری) (1144 – March 15, 1206), commonly known as Muhammad of Ghor, also Ghūr, or Muhammad Ghori, also Ghūri, was a ruler from the Ghurid dynasty based in Ghor in what is today west-central Afghanistan who ruled from 1173 CE to 1206 CE.[1][2] Until the death of his elder brother, Ghiyath al-Din Muhammad ibn Sam (Persian: غیاث‌ الدین محمد بن سام), also known as Ghiyath al-Din Ghori, in 1203, he was the junior ruling partner in a diarchy, with Ghiyath al-Din governing the western regions from his capital in Firozkoh and he, Mu'izz ad-Din, or Muhammad of Ghor, the eastern ones.[2] Muhammad of Ghur eventually extended Islamic rule into South Asia, as far east as the Ganges delta in Bengal and regions to the north in Bihar. Under evolving Muslim dynasties, Islamic rule was to extend during the next half millennium to many parts of South Asia.

The brothers belonged to a family of unenslaved, tribal chiefs, or warlords, in a culturally uncharted region of the mountains of west-central Afghanistan. This region was populated by nomadic people practising pastoralism.[3][4] The brothers' family had converted to Islam a few generations before.[5] They spoke an eastern Iranian dialect of the Persian language, but one quite distinct from the mainstream Persian of the time.[6] In 1173, the brothers captured Ghazni in eastern Afghanistan from the Ghaznavid Empire. After Ghazni, they proceeded to acquire territory to the west in Khurasan: they captured the city of Herat from the Seljuqs in 1175. Their hold on cities farther west was brief: Merv, Tus and Nishapur were captured in 1199–1200, but lost within six months, and Herat the following year, as were most lands to the west after 1204.[7] To the east, Muhammad of Ghor used Ghazni as a base to launch attacks into the plains of the Punjab region in what is today Pakistan. In 1175 Muhammad of Ghor entered Punjab through an intermediate pass between the Khyber Pass in the north and the Bolan Pass in the south, crossing the Indus River, and attacking the Isma'ili-community in the city of Multan in the mid-river valley, and later the city of Uch.[8] In 1176, Muhammad of Ghor captured the city of Peshawar in the far northwest of the subcontinent and secured the adjoining Khyber Pass, the traditional route of entry for invading armies.[9] A southern route in 1179 took him into Gujarat in what is today western India, plundering the Śiva temple at Kiradu.[10] In this, he was following a century-and-half-old strategy of Mahmud of Ghazni of using the proceeds of plunder in the eastern regions to finance imperial aspirations in the western.[11] In 1181 when he attacked Lahore the capital of the last Ghaznavid sultan Khusrau Malik, in the valley of Ravi,[12] this strategy had changed to one of holding the captured regions.[13] Although Muhammad of Ghor was not successful, the next year he followed a southerly arc to the port city of Debal on the Arabian Sea coast of Sindh, thereby securing the regions in the lower Indus valley.[14] The success enabled him in 1186 to attack Lahore again and displace the Ghaznavids' from their last stronghold.[15][16]

Extending his ambition further eastwards, in 1191, Muhammad of Ghor met the Chahamana ruler Prithviraj III, at Tarain, 120 km (75 mi) north of Delhi, the latter location then a minor fort on the northernmost spurs of the Aravalli Hills. He suffered his first defeat at Tarain and also an injury from an enemy spear. He returned to Ghazni, recuperated, and trained his swift-horse cavalry to more effectively attack war elephants, the mainstay of Prithviraj III's army.[17] In a return engagement at Tarain in 1192, Muhammad of Ghor won, his opponent's slow-moving elephants were not effective against Central Asian mounted archers shooting arrows at full gallop from both flanks.[18][19] Prithviraj III was captured and executed soon after. Muhammad of Ghur spent the next 10 years capturing the major political centres of north India: Meerut, Hansi, Delhi, Kol (modern Aligarh), Benares, Ajmer, Bayana, Ujjain, Badaun, Kanauj, Gwalior and Kalinjar. The Ghurid brothers—having mutated rapidly from a marginalized pastoral chieftaincy in west-central Afghanistan to the control of large regions in north India, Afghanistan and Khurasan— now adopted the outward characteristics of a Persianate bureaucratic and centralized state.[20] Muhammad of Ghor began to style himself as "the great sultan" (sultan al- mu‘azzam).[21] By plundering the temples favoured by Hindu royalty, capturing their treasures, and exacting tributes from the rulers he had subjugated, as well as land-tax from their landed elites, Muhammad of Ghor was able to extract unprecedented revenue.[22][23] but he also sought to minimize the disruption by making pragmatic accommodations with landed elites and the leading political figures and allowing them to stay in place [24][7] Prithviraj III's son became a tributary king to the Ghurids, ruling both from Ajmer and the Ranthambore fort.[25][26] The changes Muhammad of Ghor brought about were not primarily religious, nor were conversions to Islam involved. Although temple desecration was practised, it typically occurred in the context of a moving frontier of conflict as the means for showing down the royal sponsor,[27][28] more for plunder than for iconoclastic destruction.[29][30] Whereas royal temples were raided and brought down, the ones attended by ordinary people were often left undisturbed.[31][32] The more salient change was military: horse cavalry came to gradually replace war elephants in South Asia.[33] In 1199 the two Sultans became Sunni Muslims, ending their earlier allegiance to a provincial Islamic tradition.[34]

In 1196 Muhammad Ghuri returned to Afghanistan, deputing the political and military operations in South Asia to a handful of elite slave commanders.[35] He joined his elder brother in military campaigns in Afghanistan and Khurasan and became the supreme sultan upon Ghiyath al-Din's death in 1203.[35] The following year, he suffered a devastating defeat at the hands of his Turkish rivals in Khurasan, and Ghurid power there quickly died out, and soon after in Afghanistan itself.[35] In 1206, the sultan was assassinated while offering evening prayers.[35] A protracted civil war broke out among his commanders, including Qutb ud-Din Aibak in Delhi, Nasir ad-Din Qabacha in Sindh; Baha al-Din Tughril in Bayana (in eastern Rajasthan) and in the zone between Ghazni and the Indus valley, Taj al-Din Yildiz. All his slave commanders had become legally free, or manumitted, upon their master’s death. [35] It would be some time before Delhi, under Aibek would emerge as South Asia's major capital, and the Delhi sultanate as the region's dominant state.[35]

References

  1. ^ Bosworth 2012, p. 586.
  2. ^ a b Eaton 2019, p. 40 Quote: Ghiyath al- Din’s younger brother and junior partner in this diarchy was Shihab al- Din bin Sam, or Mu‘izz al- Din, commonly known as Muhammad of Ghur, or simply Muhammad Ghuri (r. 1173–1206).
  3. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 39 Quote: "the Ghurids were free, pastoral chieftains in a culturally marginalized and geographically remote backwater of Afghanistan."
  4. ^ Lapidus 2014 Quote: " In the late twelfth century, free Afghan mountain warlords, under the leadership of the Ghurid dynasty, began the systematic conquest of India."
  5. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 39 Quote: They had been converted to Islam only a few generations before they abruptly broke out of their mountain strongholds onto the plains of India, adhering until the late twelfth century to an obscure but zealous sect, the Karramiya, considered deviant by mainline Sunni Muslims."
  6. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 39 Quote: "Ethnically they were of eastern Iranian origin, but their dialect of Persian was so distinct from that of contemporary Iran or Khurasan that the Ghaznavid sultan Mas‘ud needed the help of interpreters when he campaigned in their territory."
  7. ^ a b Thomas 2018, pp. 99–100.
  8. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 40 These began in 1175, when he marched through the Kurram Pass to the middle Indus valley and attacked the Isma‘ili Muslim community in Multan."
  9. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 40 Quote: "In 1176 he captured Peshawar and secured the Khyber Pass, giving him direct access to the Indian plains from his base in Ghazni."
  10. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 40 Quote: "Three years later he advanced into Gujarat, sacking the Śiva temple at Kiradu."
  11. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 40 Quote: "Up to this point, the sultan was following Mahmud of Ghazni’s policy of a century and a half earlier, raiding Indian sites for plunder in order to finance his dynasty’s imperial ambitions to the west. But his intentions soon turned to seizing and holding territory in upper India.
  12. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 40 Quote: "In 1181 he attacked but failed to capture Lahore, the capital of the last Ghaznavid sultan, Khusrau Malik (r. 1160–86)."
  13. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 40 Quote: "But his intentions soon turned to seizing and holding territory in upper India.
  14. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 40 Quote: "The next year he secured his southern flank to India by seizing the Sindi port of Debal.
  15. ^ Lapidus 2014 Quote: "Between 1175 and 1192, the Ghurids occupied Uch, Multan, Peshawar, Lahore, and Delhi."
  16. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 40 Quote: "In 1186 he successfully took Lahore, finally extinguishing the Ghaznavid dynasty."
  17. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 40 Quote: "Muhammad Ghuri spent the next year regrouping in Ghazni. There he prepared for a return engagement with Prithviraj, training his cavalrymen and their horses to combat the Chauhans by having them attack mock elephants made of mud and wood."
  18. ^ Ludden 2014 Quote: "Central Asian warriors became supreme during South Asia’s medieval transition by deploying swift-horse cavalry skilled in firing arrows at full gallop, volley after volley; by raising vast armies dedicated to the siege and open-field combat, undeterred by local alliance building; and by organizing cavalry well supplied with saddles, stirrups, and the latest weapons, running rapidly over long distances, staying on the move to subsist on the fruits of conquest. Turk and Afghan tribes supplied the best men for this kind of warfare, as well as ethnic solidarity for discipline and social support. Central Asian steppe grasslands and herds provided horses at low prices."
  19. ^ Kulke & Rothermund 2016 Quote: "The Rajput cavalry consisted of freemen who would not take orders easily, whereas the cavalry of the central Asian invaders consisted of specially trained slaves who had practically grown up with their horses and were subjected to a constant drill. Rushing towards the enemy and turning their horses suddenly, they would then – unobstructed by the heads of the horses and at a moment when they had stopped dead in their tracks – shoot a volley of well-aimed arrows before disappearing as quickly as they had come. The performance would be repeated elsewhere, thus decimating and confusing the enemy without great losses on the Muslim side."
  20. ^ They proclaimed their sovereignty at the Friday prayer and using the imperial umbrella and kettle drums, both Persianate symbols of political authority.
  21. ^ Andre Wink has described this transformation as, "Effectively, pastoral nomads turned themselves into post-nomadic conquest elites in a society of settled peasants." Wink 2020, p. 64
  22. ^ Robb 2011 Quote: "Recent scholarship has reattached the history of the Delhi Sultanate to that of Afghanistan, where many of the protagonists’ main interests remained, ... of the other three types of revenue permitted by the sharia (Muslim law) — namely booty from conquests, special taxes for Muslim religious and charitable foundations, and a tax on agricultural production — it was the last, the land tax, that became the mainstay of the regime, rising at times to a notional half of the produce. Even had there been no other considerations, this would have implied that the Muslim states became ‘indigenized’, as they did from the time of Muhammad Ghuri."
  23. ^ Wink 2020, p. 74.
  24. ^ Flood 2009, p. 110.
  25. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 42 Quote: "Having violently annexed so much north Indian territory, Muhammad Ghuri sought to minimize the disruption of the conquest by establishing continuities with the pre-conquest order. At the local level of political authority, landed elites appear to have remained in office since no contemporary inscriptions suggest that they had been displaced. At the upper level, leading political figures were also maintained in power. Whereas the Chauhan raja Prithviraj III had been captured in 1192 and soon thereafter put to death, his son was installed as a tributary king to the Ghurids, ruling over both Ajmer and the formidable hill fort of Ranthambhor "
  26. ^ Flood 2009, p. 111.
  27. ^ Asher & Talbot 2022, pp. 73–74.
  28. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 41 Quote: "To this end, their armies destroyed Hindu temples patronized by defeated rulers, which followed the traditional Indian practice of desecrating royal temples of defeated monarchs, thereby detaching enemy rulers from the most visible sign of their former sovereignty."
  29. ^ Metcalf & Metcalf 2012, pp. 40–42 Quote: "Historians now discredit not only accounts of forced mass conversion, but also accounts of the systematic destruction of temples and other non-Muslim holy places. As in the case of accounts of conversions, reading the Muslim court histories as matters of fact, rather than as literary convention, has misled many scholars. There was, to be sure, destruction of non-Muslim temples and places of worship under specific circumstances, for example, while raiding areas outside one's own territories for plunder."
  30. ^ Asher 2020, p. 31 Quote: "Muhammad of Ghor, who did conquer Benares in 1193–94 ... might have plundered Sarnath, more likely for whatever wealth was imagined to be stored there ... than for the sake of iconoclastic destruction."
  31. ^ Fogelin 2015, p. 222–223 Quote: "The same could have occurred with Buddhist institutions focused on the laity, had they existed. ... However, by the thirteenth century CE, Buddhist monasteries in the Gangetic Plain and northeastern India were prominently supported by local and regional kings, and their relations with the non-elite laity consisted of little more than serving as landlords."
  32. ^ Eaton 2000, p. 297 Quote: “Detached from a Buddhist laity, these establishments had by this time become dependent on the patronage of local royal authorities, with whom they were identified."
  33. ^ Quote: "the medieval Indo-Islamic states of the Sultans of Delhi exhibited a capacity to mobilize land revenue and commercial resources far exceeding that of their Hindu predecessors but did not set out to convert the “infidels” whose “idols” they attacked. The changes they effected were not primarily religious. Perhaps most fundamentally, the Sultans of Delhi, in the course of the medieval centuries, put the Indian subcontinent through a horse warrior revolution, driving out or marginalizing the use of war elephants."Wink 2020, p. 65
  34. ^ Eaton 2019, p. 41.
  35. ^ a b c d e f Eaton 2019, p. 43.

Bibliography

  • Asher, Catherine B.; Talbot, Cynthia (2022). India before Europe (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108591904. ISBN 978-1-108-42816-3.
  • Asher, Frederick M. (2020). Sarnath: A critical history of the place where Buddhism began. Los Angeles: Getty Research Institute. pp. 2–3, 432–433. ISBN 9781606066164. LCCN 2019019885.
  • Asif, Manan Ahmed (2016). A book of Conquest: The Chachanama and Muslims Origins in South Asia. Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-66011-3.
  • Bosworth, C. Edmund (2012), "Ghurids", Encyclopedia Iranica, X (6): 586–590
  • Eaton, Richard M. (2019). India in the Persianate Age: 1000–1765. Oakland, CA: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-32512-8.
  • Eaton, R. M. (2000). "Temple Desecration and Indo-Muslim States". Journal of Islamic Studies. 11 (3). Oxford University Press: 283–319. doi:10.1093/jis/11.3.283. JSTOR 26198197.
  • Flood, Finbarr B. (2009). Objects of Translation: Material Culture and Medieval "Hindu-Muslim" Encounter. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-12594-7.
  • Fogelin, Lars (2015). An Archaeological History of Indian Buddhism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-1999-4821-5.
  • Kulke, H.; Rothermund, D. (2016). A History of India (6th ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-1-138-96114-2.
  • Lapidus, Ira M. (2014). A History of Islamic Societies (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-51430-9.
  • Ludden, D. (2014). India and South Asia: A Short History (2nd, revised ed.). Oneworld Publications. ISBN 978-1-85168-936-1.
  • Metcalf, Barbara D.; Metcalf, Thomas R. (2012). A Concise History of Modern India. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02649-0.
  • Robb, P. (2011). A History of India. Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-230-34549-2.
  • Talbot, Cynthia (2016). The Last Hindu Emperor: Prithviraj Chauhan and the Indian Past 1200–2000. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-11856-0.
  • Thomas, David C. (2018). The Ebb and Flow of the Ghurid Empire. Sydney University Press. ISBN 978-1-74332-543-8.
  • Truschke, Audrey (2021). The Language of History: Sanskrit Narratives of Indo-Muslim Rule. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-19704-5.
  • Wink, André (2020). The Making of the Indo-Islamic World: c. 700–1800 CE. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-41774-7.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fowler%26fowler/Muhammad_of_Ghor&oldid=1117400207"