This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Nimiokoala is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.
This article contains a translation of Nimiokoala greystanesi from ru.wikipedia.
Requested move 24 February 2024
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support - A quick Google search shows the genus has about 20x the number of search results as the "common" name. - UtherSRG(talk) 00:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excluding Wikipedia-derived sources, aggregator sites and pages where "Riversleigh rainforest" is included as the location rather than part of the name, only the Australian Museum (and a NSW government page that cites the Australian Museum) seems a credible source for the use of the name. That isn't enough to meet Wikipedia common name. — Jts1882 | talk 07:18, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above, this is a crufty relict of old wiki forces that want to create names for all taxa.--Kevmin§ 16:45, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.