Talk:Luther Standing Bear

Luther Standing Bear was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 7, 2019). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment / Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Indigenous peoples of North America Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Old West Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as Low-importance). Westerns Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Education Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Luther Standing Bear/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: No Great Shaker (talk · contribs) 19:56, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Hello. I will review this. Will be in touch soon. Thanks. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:56, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am applying WP:GAFAIL here because the article is a long way from meeting condition 1b of the GA criteria in that it does not comply with manual of style guidelines. The relevant guideline is MOS:QUOTE and I have a secondary concern about non-citation of some quotes, so the article would also fail condition 2b if a full review were undertaken. Given that there is a need for at least one valid cleanup banner to be imposed, that is a second reason for GAFAIL. The misuse of quotations is too extensive to justify placing the review on hold. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:15, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]