This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
Should this journal be considered a reliable SCIENTIFIC source?
I doubt anyone would dispute that this journal is representative of many scientific Christians. However, I find it dubious that this journal employs all the same safeguards of objectivity that most scientific journals do, and objectivity is a hallmark of proper science. I think we should discuss whether or not this journal is reliable for describing purely scientific progress. - Drlight11 (talk) 22:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]