Talk:Dudley Tunnel

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bridges and Tunnels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. West Midlands Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. UK Waterways Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Dudley Tunnel map.

The category "Canals in England" has been removed from this article on the grounds of redundancy. The counter argument is that an article needs to be advertised in as many relevant categories as possible so that the maximum number of interested parties can find it. Instead of continuing to revert other editor's changes over and again I have opened this issue for discussion here. Martin Cordon 16:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This issue is already being discussed on my talk page. Andy Mabbett 16:51, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reluctantly, I have to agree with Pigsonthewing with this particular canal related article. Dudley Tunnel is a canal tunnel article. The relevant canal article, not yet written, is the Dudley Canal No.1 Line. There is also (not yet written) Dudley Canal No.2 Line and Lappel Tunnel. For those articles where I disagree with Pigsonthewing, I will undo his changes.Pyrotec 20:19, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know what "The tunnel was reopened in 1973, at TRAD 1973 - Tunnel Reopening at Dudley as a result of restoration"? It makes no sense to me. I would rework it if I could understand it. Should the middle bit really be a reference? Bob1960evens (talk) 13:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bob, The tunnel was reopened in 1973, on Easter Saturday (21 April 1973). The event was known as Trad 73. It means "Tunnel Reopening at Dudley"; that information is provided on the inside cover of the Dudley Tunnel Trad 73 book that I got with my entry ticket. (I was there, I have the book and the photos, but not the teeshirt). I'll try a find a picture for you, with the Trad 73 banner. Pyrotec (talk) 17:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dudley Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dudleytunnel.co.uk/fifty_nine.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207184825/http://dudleycanaltrust.org.uk/Trips/ to http://dudleycanaltrust.org.uk/Trips/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]