Talk:Chlemoutsi

	Chlemoutsi has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result June 7, 2014 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 1, 2014. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Chlemoutsi castle (pictured) from the early 1220s is perhaps the finest example of a fortifica­tion of the early period of Frankish rule in Greece?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Fortifications / Balkan / European / Medieval / Crusades This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Fortifications task force Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present) European military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Crusades task force Greece Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages: Crusades Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Crusades task force.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Chlemoutsi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 21:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will review over the weekend.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:29, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I copyedited per my copyediting disclaimer, down to Keep. These are my edits. Concerning: "Andravida, some 13 kilometres (8.1 mi) away, and the Principality's largest port and town, Glarentza (c. 5 kilometres (3.1 mi)).": avoid "))". Also: "some" and "c." suggest it's approximate, but "8.1" and "3.1" suggest it's not. - Dank (push to talk) 14:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Finished copyediting. - Dank (push to talk) 21:13, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• When you're done here, I think it's good to go for an A-class nomination. - Dank (push to talk) 14:36, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and infobox

• No coordinates?
• Add convert template for 226 m

History

• "13 km (about 8 mi) away, and the Principality's largest port and town, Glarentza (c. 5 km or 3 mi). " use Template:Convert.
• A. Bon -who is he??

Outer ward

• Add convert templates for 5 and 10 metres.

Keep

• Why "apparently judged"?

@Cplakidas: Looks in good shape, just those very minor things and I'll pass it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to both of you for your work! I made the required changes. Thanks to Dank for the thumbs up, and over to you dear Dr. Blofeld: other than technical issues and GA requirements, how do you rate it? You have more experience with articles on towns etc, so in your view, is anything lacking, should I add more detail/context/something else? Constantine ✍ 16:17, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you know what is available for it, but it certainly covers what is necessary to pass GA which I will do now. You might though add a bit to the lead on the architecture just so it covers the whole article though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:14, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: