Talk:Equestrian statue of Charles II trampling Cromwell

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sculpture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture articles Visual arts: Public art This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles This article is supported by the public art task force. Yorkshire Low‑importance Equestrian statue of Charles II trampling Cromwell is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. London: Public art This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Public art task force.

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in England may be able to help!

Ham II - what is the evidence for "Charles II Trampling Cromwell" being the title for this sculpture, rather than just being a description? It is in fact an equestrian statue of Charles II trampling Cromwell - or at least it has been interpreted as such - but has anyone outside Wikipedia used "Charles II Trampling Cromwell" as a title? As far as I recall, none of the sources use that title. Has it been invented for this article? Theramin (talk) 00:27, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Theramin: As a descriptive name in sentence case, rather than as the title of an artwork, "Charles II trampling Cromwell" (the article's original title) would be incomplete, and so would fail WP:PRECISE. A fuller article title which would meet that criterion would be Equestrian statue of Charles II trampling Cromwell, but that would not be very WP:CONCISE. Equestrian statue of Charles II, Newby Hall would meet both those criteria plus WP:CONSISTENT and MOS:ART/TITLE, but would lose the piquant detail of Cromwell being trampled on. (If it weren't for that, I think that could be the best title for this article.) I assume that when you created the article you decided that a concise article title was best, and in order to make that work better with our naming conventions I've treated it as a title for the sculpture with the accompanying italics and title case.

It's not unheard of for us to bestow italicised titles, rather than descriptive names, on artworks where there is "no single, obvious name that is demonstrably the most frequently used for the topic" (to quote WP:COMMONNAME). Buddha Preaching his First Sermon (Sarnath) is an example that comes to mind, and to a lesser extent Diptych of Federico da Montefeltro and Battista Sforza. Ham II (talk) 06:48, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation, Ham II. I don't feel particularly strongly about the previous title over the ones you've suggested above. But I fear you are crediting me with more thought about the matter than I gave it 2.5 years ago: I think I was just reusing the language in several articles which mentioned a "statue of Charles II trampling Oliver Cromwell", or similar. As far as I recall, it was meant to be descriptive, not a formal title, as I'm not aware of a proper title being used in any of the sources.

Even if our policies allow us to invent titles, I'd rather not create one from the whole cloth if we can avoid it. Perhaps Equestrian statue of Charles II trampling Cromwell (no italics) might be better? Theramin (talk) 01:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Theramin: I'm happy to go with that, so I've made the move and turned the other options into redirects. Thanks for your understanding! Ham II (talk) 06:35, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]