Talk:Battle of Ongal

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Middle Ages Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Bulgaria Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Greece: Byzantine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force. Ukraine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Eastern Europe (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Eastern Europe, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Eastern EuropeWikipedia:WikiProject Eastern EuropeTemplate:WikiProject Eastern EuropeEastern Europe articles European history This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Military history: Balkan / European / Roman & Byzantine / Medieval This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present) European military history task force Roman and Byzantine military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Island Peuce was the name of a part of the Danube delta (not be confused with Leuce island, today Zminyi). The map reintroduced July 3, 2017, show the actual shoreline of the Danube delta and two giant canals, totally fictitious, through 200m high hills! I don't understand why some contributors are so keen to spread these errors? May be because these errors come from their schoolbooks to which they are sentimentally attached? --MAXHO (talk) 12:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Imo, that section is problematic:

• A huge part of it consists of a quote from a primary source (no citation). Articles should be based primarily on reliable secondary sources.
• The remaining text (completly unreferenced too)just repeats the primary source, except for a vague statement that half of the primary source is "according to popular belief".

I think we can do better than that.--Dipa1965 (talk) 19:15, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"This battle was a significant moment in European history". Although I think that this statement is probably true, we need a secondary citation to support it.--Dipa1965 (talk) 19:19, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]