Talk:Alcazaba of the Alhambra

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Spain Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Fortifications / European / Spanish / Early Muslim This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Fortifications task force European military history task force Spanish military history task force Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

All of the sources consulted here simply refer to this fortress as "the Alcazaba", with the context making clear that it's the Alcazaba of the Alhambra, Granada. Since "Alcazaba" on its own is ambiguous and already has a general article (Alcazaba), "Alcazaba of the Alhambra" seemed like a reasonable and easy title, but I have no strong feelings about it. If other editors think that something like "Alcazaba, Alhambra" is better, that's fine with me. R Prazeres (talk) 23:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]