Template:Admin dashboard
Administrative backlog
Reports
Bot-reported
- 37.39.193.190 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 12.18.211.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses used by Wikipedia users. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 16:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2606:9400:99a0:5ce0:4c48:8577:2c:13f (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1197 five times in the last 5 minutes (Excessive exclamation marks, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2a02:587:201f:ac00:16ce:cb26:1f27:baa6 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 189 five times in the last 5 minutes (BLP vandalism or libel, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
- 95.90.245.211 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) LTA / block evasion by "Harry the house". Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 12:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. Or, at least give us some diffs. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Anyone familiar with his work will recognize the modus operandi. Recent IPs include 145.15.244.231, 185.201.63.253, 82.5.106.56, 92.10.81.30, 86.182.189.254, 109.144.221.73. There are many, many more. Pages targeted are typically UK politics and television, generally with overlinking and violations of WP:NOTBROKEN and WP:NOPIPE, and notably changing the word "after" to "following". SPI is generally too slow to intervene to limit the cleanup work, and unable to keep pace with fast-changing IP addresses. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 15:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Kian Gillis (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Regularly adding unsourced relationship material to BLP articles despite warnings not to do so. Seasider53 (talk) 14:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 87.221.118.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) WP:SPA vandal who refuses to understand the meaning of "chronological" despite excessive explanations and warnings. Kingsif (talk) 14:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 37.39.193.190 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) persistent vandalism-only after final warning. signed, Willondon (talk) 15:25, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- TheChosenOneTCO (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Persistent disruptive editing after final warning. FromCzech (talk) 15:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- ATTITUDEKING567 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) vandalism in the form of abuse and spamming his name, multiple times. Examples include this name spamming and this string of abuses which translate to Motherfucker among other unsavory words.
- 82.30.81.9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Vandalism after final warning Freyam Muhan 16:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses used by Wikipedia users. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 16:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:861:3F07:61F0:7D40:51FA:540C:4DD6/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Long-term disruptive editing and unsourced additions. Almost all edits up to this point have been reverted. Aintabli (talk) 17:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2803:2D60:1117:5E7:2092:CC41:575:289 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Dark Crimes (diff): vandalism after recent release of block. Resumed off 1 month block on /64 range. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Bot-reported
- Mcbling.bri.kaulitz.gmail (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Midget123scribe (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Vidanth ugly stupid baby BALD (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "stupid" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 15:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Sortedandcoltd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- WaterparksSucks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
- Zendrago X (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Promotional username, user has a YouTube channel with the same name. M S Hassan (talk) 14:52, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's a pen name, they haven't edited to promote their you tube channel. Secretlondon (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Secretlondon They actually did once. M S Hassan (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's a pen name, they haven't edited to promote their you tube channel. Secretlondon (talk) 15:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- PT SUMBER ENERGY (Sylvi Febriya - Marketing) (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 05:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. (and anyway not a username violation, as it clearly identifies an individual associated with the company). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Bora Musiq (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Agent 007 (talk) 13:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation of the username policy. Stage names and pen names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Nobody (talk) 13:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Question: Requesting an admin to review as per the contribution made by Bora Musiq. Agent 007 (talk) 14:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that only admins should be declining reports here, but it appears that all of the account's edits have now been supressed, and whoever did that did not see fit to block them for it. There's basically no way for a "regular" admin to review this now. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 17:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- DJUKUNNATION (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Agent 007 (talk) 13:31, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: User is in the category: User talk pages with conflict of interest notices. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 13:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 17:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Maxthekillbot (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a misleading username. Wikipedia:MISLEADNAME - last three letters are "bot" which this user is clearly not a bot per edit summaries and no user page clarifying this is a valid alternative bot account operated by an established Wikipedia user who knows how to run bots. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 16:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Josh Gavin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Agent 007 (talk) 17:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Comment: I'd call this an edge case, in that it is the name of a person who probably was not very notable, and who has been dead for some time. It's also not a distinctive name at all, I'd imagine there's many persons by this name. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 17:43, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Leocybsec (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Represents company, see usepage Pahunkat (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
User:Iwaqarhashmi
- User:Iwaqarhashmi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite template protection: Requesting indefinte template protection for my user page because it was vandalized before, so I copied all the contents of the user page onto a ".css" subpage, but an extended confirmed user added the wrong COI template recently. Thanks! Waqar💬 16:27, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Uh ... this is sort of a unique request. Anybody other regular reviewer here have a take on this? Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understand this is a unique request, but I'm hoping you can help. I would be incredibly grateful if you could consider fully protecting my user page to prevent any further vandalism once and for all. Waqar💬 05:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Template-protection or full protection would make the userpage inaccessible for almost everyone, and also for the OP. I see the incident of adding a COI template as a one-time off which doesn't amount to enough disruption to warrant protection; I would not grant this request. Lectonar (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- While template protection can limit editing access, it doesn't necessarily render the user page inaccessible. Editors with appropriate permissions, like administrators or template editors, can still make edits if necessary. In the case of a COI template, a one-time incident can still be disruptive, especially if it affects the accuracy of the userpage. Waqar💬 07:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's why I wrote ' for almost everyone. But imagine you want a change made, and if the page was protected like you requested (so you can't edit it it yourself), you would then need an admin or template editor to implement the changes you want to make. I just gave my 2 cents here, and will let another admin decide. Lectonar (talk) 07:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- The content of my user page is still uneditable by most users, even without template protection, because it's been transcluding from a ".css" subpage on my user page, and whoever wants to make changes to my user page can leave a message on my talk page. That's a much better approach! Waqar💬 07:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Template-protection or full protection would make the userpage inaccessible for almost everyone, and also for the OP. I see the incident of adding a COI template as a one-time off which doesn't amount to enough disruption to warrant protection; I would not grant this request. Lectonar (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I think it would be consistent with WP:UPROT to deny this request because the
genuine and realistic need
requirement has not been met. The level of disruption on the page is very low. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I understand this is a unique request, but I'm hoping you can help. I would be incredibly grateful if you could consider fully protecting my user page to prevent any further vandalism once and for all. Waqar💬 05:32, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Long-term abuse/Meena Kurian
Indefinite create protection: Repeatedly recreated – Please restrict creation to autoconfirmed. LTA is known for disrupting his own LTA page, which has already been semi-protected, and various other LTA-related pages. He just created this page as pure vandalism. Very few non-autoconfirmed are aware of LTA pages in wikispace, let alone have a reason to edit the talk page. Air on White (talk) 03:03, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Scar (The Lion King)
- Scar (The Lion King) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent vandalism over the past couple of weeks by numerous new and IP users. Sigma440 (talk) 03:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
List of All Elite Wrestling personnel
- List of All Elite Wrestling personnel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nonsense edits by anon IPs. Vjmlhds (talk) 03:56, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Hari Singh Nalwa
- Hari Singh Nalwa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent edit warring (spanning at least 2 years) pertaining to his caste. Constant addition of a caste contradictory to what sources state. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 05:11, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Foreign relations of Malaysia
- Foreign relations of Malaysia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Dynamic IP disruption. May spill out into China–Malaysia relations. CMD (talk) 07:41, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Toofan (2010 film)
- Toofan (2010 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. -Lemonaka 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Toofan (2024 film)
- Toofan (2024 film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: It was protected one time because there was high level IP vandalism. After the protection period ended another ip vandalism started and I requested for page protection second time, but it wasn't protected. Now again a ip is trying to edit it with original research. I reverted it, but it is clear that they will not be stale because they tried the same thing with different ips before that. So please I request you not to deny its protection this time and request you to protect it for at least two months because it is gonna be released on Eid-ul-Adha which is near and during that time there will be high level editing and adding unsourced box-office like what happened to Priyotoma and Rajkumar (2024 film). Mehedi Abedin (talk) 09:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Houdini (Eminem song)
- Houdini (Eminem song) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Launchballer 12:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia coverage of Donald Trump
- Wikipedia coverage of Donald Trump (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Persistent IP vandalism issues in the AMPOL topic area. QuicoleJR (talk) 12:45, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Reece Walsh
- Reece Walsh (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Indefinite pending changes protection: Violations of the biographies of living persons policy. Has happened over the past couple of months. mwwv converse∫edits 12:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Scar (The Lion King)
- Scar (The Lion King) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Some sort of meme is going around about Scar and Adolf Hitler being the same character (or something 🤷) is leading to IPs and SPA accounts adding that 'fact' to this article. It's getting wearing. 81.187.192.168 (talk) 12:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Steve Ballmer
- Steve Ballmer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Almost certainly the same editor creating new accounts in order to BLP-vandalise the Ballmer article. Chaheel Riens (talk) 13:44, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Medline Industries
- Medline Industries (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Various IPs and one newly registered editor continually trying to add a list of competitors. Skywatcher68 (talk) 15:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Bernard Arnault
- Bernard Arnault (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: consistent vandalism from IPs TenToe (talk) 15:54, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Wonderful Pretty Cure!
- Wonderful Pretty Cure! (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Want Semi protection for this article and sub article List of Wonderful Pretty Cure! episodes
Semi-Protection: a lot of people are changing stuff and reverting changes like leaking spoilers before it happens. Anime1990 (talk) 16:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Adobe Lightroom
- Adobe Lightroom (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Temporary semi-protection: Tag team SPAs add links to download site ... over and over ... can we have a break please? Or is there admin magic that could prevent that site (lrapkp.com) getting linked to ... ?? Thanks. DBaK (talk) 16:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- I’m pretty sure the admins can blacklist sites from being linked to, at least with sourcing. Dunno about vandalism though. Blueskiesdry (talk) 16:48, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
KGBT-TV
Temporary full protection: Persistent addition of original research by new and logged-out editors. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:38, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Montana Tucker
Reason: This page has been protected in 2008, after several attempts at COI biographies. In other words, very much justified at that time. 16 years have passed and by now she passes the GNG. I wish to undo what is by now an injustice. gidonb (talk) 22:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Gidonb: Do you have a ready draft article you could use to help justify unprotecting it? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 22:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I have something on my machine I plan to use once unprotected. It's not very organized. I will add plenty of references and tie to the many pages where she is currently mentioned.[1] It's a similar effort really to the Brian Balmages article that I recreated. Was also understandably removed for peacock, yet notable. gidonb (talk) 22:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Module:RFX report
- Module:RFX report (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Downgrade to semi-protection to match Template:RFX report, which is the only template that invokes this module. They are both transcluded on 389 other pages. (For a period of three months in 2022 the module was transcluded on >5000 pages because of this edit, later reverted, so the bot template-protected it.) If semi is too low, please increase Template:RFX report to match the module. SilverLocust 💬 06:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Module:Rfx
- Module:Rfx (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Reason: Downgrade to semi-protection from template-protection. Transcluded on 457 pages. It is invoked by Module:RFX report, so the bot template-protected it in 2022 for the same reason. SilverLocust 💬 06:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Calgary International Airport
- Calgary International Airport (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotection: I think it can have the PC removed at this point, I don't see persistent vandalism or disruptive editing in the past couple years of edits. the only IP vandalism has been minor and infrequent. it's certainly not at the level it was when the page was protected. I also see constructive edits by unregistered and unconfirmed editors. -- Aunva6talk - contribs 15:53, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Israel-Hamas War
- Israel-Hamas War (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
I would like to request that... (the map be updated to show that Israel now controls the entire Gaza-Egypt border) . LordOfWalruses (talk) 15:25, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- @LordOfWalruses this is not the place. Contentious topics should not be unprotected. 48JCLTALK 12:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- @48JCL: Unregistered and non-extended-confirmed editors are allowed to request edits to ARBPIA pages here. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- The talk page Talk:Israel-Hamas War is protected, therefore edit requests by non-extended-confirmed users land here. That is acceptable, and this request made above is reasonable. The people who actually do participate on that talk page should be reviewing requests here that remain open and haven't been declined for days. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:30, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Handled requests
A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 0 protected edit requests v·h
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 14:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
| 4 template-protected edit requests v·h
| ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:10, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled(add request • view requests)
User:Prince of Erebor
I have created 80 articles, primarily focused on Sinophone cinema and fantasy literature, with 2 currently undergoing GAN. All of my articles have been promptly reviewed, and none of them have been deleted or marked for maintenance. I am requesting autopatrolled rights to alleviate the workload of the patrollers, especially those who actively review film articles and have reviewed the majority of my articles, allowing them to allocate more time to address articles that truly require attention. As a side note, I am a veteran editor with patroller rights on Chinese Wikipedia, having authored over 200 articles, including a dozen featured and good articles. While I fully understand that there are differences in policies and MOS across different Wikipedias, I believe this demonstrates my credibility and knowledge in assessing article quality.— Prince of Erebor（The Book of Mazarbul） 13:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC) User:SheriffIsInTown
I frequently create articles on notable subjects, having authored 530 articles, with the majority facing no issues. Only three were deleted, mainly due to changes in election results affecting their notability. I'm requesting autopatroller rights to ease the burden on other editors reviewing my articles and help reduce the backlog of new article reviews. Sheriff | ☎ 911 | 23:36, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
User:MinorProphet
Hi, I'd like to request Autopatrolled rights, please. A list of articles I created is here, and articles in various states of completion waiting in the wings are here. Cheers, >MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) MinorProphet (talk) 16:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) User:Eagledj
I have written 93 articles HERE, mostly music, biographies, golf, history, architecture, and people from Tennessee. I'd like to apply for auto patrolled status. I have done many BLPs including 5 GAs and I am familiar with the guidelines. Thank you.Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Eagledj (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC) User:Monhiroe
have created 80 articles and to create more in the future. Monhiroe (talk) 18:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC) User:KingEdinburgh
I regularly create military bio articles. KingEdinburgh (talk) 05:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC) User:TrimmerinWiki
As part of NPP, I've noticed the high quality work of TrimmerinWiki, with similar supportive statements on their talk page. Their pages are well-developed and researched. Klbrain (talk) 10:26, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Sanslogique
Hello. I would like to request Autopatrolled rights on the advice of user Broc, who appreciated my editorial skills. I have created more than 140 articles, mostly music-related. (I also have these rights in Russian Wikipedia.) Sanslogique (talk) 14:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
User:CharlieMehta
I am requesting autopatrolled rights for the second time to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia. My previous request was denied due to a lack of editing experience in biographical pages. Since then, I have focused on improving my expertise in this area. Since then, I have focused on improving my expertise in this area. I may not meet the criteria based on quantity, but I hope my work demonstrates the necessary quality. Charlie (talk) 12:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC) User:Losipov
I'm applying for autopatrolled rights for a second time, with my first request being denied in April 2023. The reason for that decline was that my previous articles were tagged for "notability". Since then, I have worked on bringing articles over from the Russian Wikipedia and have had relatively few problems when other editors were reviewing them (I don't bring over everything from those respective pages, so I add a tag for expanding from Russian to let others know that information is still there). I feel like I have learned from what I was doing wrong, and in the process, I have made dozens more articles since the decline. Therefore, I respectfully request that I be granted the autopatrolled permission this time around. Thanks in advance for your consideration. Losipov (talk) 17:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC) User:Ednabrenze
I regularly create new articles until I took a break to focus on work and studies. I have now concluded the studies and have retuned to creating new articles. I am requesting this right to help bring down the large number of articles waiting for reviewers attentions as articles I create will no longer join the queue if this is granted. Ednabrenze (talk) 02:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC) User:Dobbyelf62
|
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser(add request • view requests)
User:Orange sticker
Hi! I've been looking for a way to clean up reflists when there are duplicate citations for the same reference, hoping this might solve my problem if I can be approved. Orange sticker (talk) 23:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC) User:Davidindia
Since I do a lot of editing would like to use autowikibrowser... requesting rights Davidindia (talk) 10:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC) User:CanonNiAWB
Hi. I would like AWB rights granted to my alternate account, CanonNiAWB, to clean up maintenence categories and fix typos. Thanks! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 13:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC) User:WiinterU
I would like to have autowikibrowser rights to speed up edits that are too slow when done manually. I work with {{infobox company}} articles that would take way too long to edit manually. WiinterU 00:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
User:Arrorro
|
| There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag. |
|---|
Confirmed(add request • view requests)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer(add request • view requests)
User:Florificapis
I got busy in real life for most of March and April, so my request was put on hold per [2]. Here is my original reason for requesting NPR permissions again. I have over 120 new articles under my belt, mostly relating to medieval history, monasteries, saints, and geographical features. I am familiar with the kinds of content that would fall under CSD criteria, since I have experience wikifying new pages and tagging obviously problematic new pages for speedy deletion. I know the guidelines on notability, proper sourcing, draftifying new articles, rating talk pages using scripts, AfC, AfD, and other essential patrolling tasks. Would be quite happy to reduce the backlog while being cautious and careful. Also currently a Pending Changes Reviewer. Florificapis (talk) 00:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
User:InDimensional
I would like to participate in the NPP backlog drive.
User:TarnishedPath
I participated in the December backlog drive, being granted a trial. At the end of the trial I requested permanent NPP, which was denied with the denying admin expressing concern that I hadn't created any articles. I've since created an article about Neeraj Gupta (refer to User_talk:TarnishedPath/Archive_2#Your_submission_at_Articles_for_creation:_Neeraj_Gupta_(sculptor)_has_been_accepted) and been responsible for the bulk of the material in the newly created article Bruce Lehrmann. I had been working on Draft:Bruce Lehrmann but someone else started work on Bruce Lehrmann just as I submitted Draft:Bruce Lehrmann to AfC so I ended up merging my work over to the mainspace article and issuing a CSD for deletion of the draft. I've continued to be semi-regularly involved with AfD. I'm applying because I got a notification a while ago that there was a backlog drive for May and I'm willing to help out a bit with that. TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC) TarnishedPathtalk 06:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Trainsskyscrapers
Hello. I was initially given a month long trial as a new page reviewer after receiving an invitation on my user page, and I've been enjoying everything so far: reviewing pages, providing feedback, sending WikiLove to new and returning users who have made exceptional first attempts, tagging issues, and resolving issues myself (that could otherwise be tagged) when I have time in an attempt to reduce the backlog. I have already been renewed once, and my second trial expires in a little over two weeks (May 26th). I'm requesting either an indefinite or longer-term ability to review new pages before my time lapses. Haven't had any behavioral issues, and I try to treat all users with respect. I will continue to help clear the backlog in the meantime. Thanks again. Trainsskyscrapers (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Ixtal
Forgot to re-apply before the permission ran out. Would like to continue participating in the drive as well as afterwards. — ♠ Ixtal ( T / C ) ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 06:12, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Aszx5000
I was turned down last July 2023 as being too early. I have since increased my article (incl. BLP) creation, and have done major overhaul and expansions of important topic articles here. I remain autopatrolled on Wikipedia and WikiCommons, continue to participate in AfD, and have done some PRODS. Am willing to learn the NPP process. Thank you. Aszx5000 (talk) 13:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Rahammz
Hello. I had the new page reviewer permission but for some reason it was taken away without any explanation. I would like to apply for it again or at least get the reasoning for the removal of my permission Rahammz (talk) 01:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
User:The Sharpest Lives
I noticed there is a backlog at Wikipedia:New pages patrol, so I'd be happy to help! The Sharpest Lives (contribs) 16:49, 14 May 2024 (UTC) User:Pbritti
Hi! I was granted a one month trial with the NPP right and feel as though I did a decent job. I mainly focused on marking obviously acceptable articles. I didn't do a ton of reviewing, but I then again I felt like doing more than a handful a day would have been overstepping the constraints of a trial permission. If it is ok with the coordinating admins, I'd like to keep using the NPP right; feel welcome to simply renew the trial period for another month if you need more indication that I'll stick to procedure. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Xoak
I was suggested to apply here, and I've decided to volunteer. To make this more consistent: Thanks.
User:Babegriev
Was hoping to contribute with working on the backlog here. I have rollback and have been working on RCP, but looking to expand my experience a bit. Not much to brag about with new article creation, but there's a limited sample there I stand behind. I'm decently acquainted with the AfD scene, and have been working with new (often problematic) users and editors as best I can from RCP. I was removed from probationary AFC due to inactivity, but I'm planning to be online more in the immediate future. Also have worked with copyvio patrol and have done the oddball GA review. Looking forward to help, and happy to discuss any questions. Thanks! Bgv. (talk) 21:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Tajotep
I always wanted to review new pages since I became familiar with Wikipedia and had a good behaviour. I also got motivated to post this request when I was granted to the autopatrolled user right without applying for it (an administrator decided it voluntarily). I'll check specially the last pages on "New Pages", which are at the end of the queue, to improve those articles and helping new users by telling the mistakes they have. Thanks in advance. Tajotep (talk) 00:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC) User:Melmann
Requesting either an extension or permanent permission, as my 1-month trial is due to expire within approximately 7 days. I've participated in the backlog drive, not as much as I had hoped to due to IRL commitments, but I've received no negative feedback so far and given the size of the backlog (despite the drive) it appears that help in this area is needed.
User:IgnatiusofLondon
I was a new page reviewer until earlier this month. As my curation log suggests, while this wasn't the focus of my wikiediting, I occasionally dipped into the backlog to review new articles, a fair few of which I draftified or sent to AfD (so they weren't all easy!). I think my reviews were adequately accurate to demonstrate my suitability for the permission, and I'd like to continue helping to reduce the backlog as my wikiediting time allows. Thanks! IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 20:19, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Vestrian24Bio
Reason for requesting: I've been following up with the NPP & AfC backlogs. There are still 9200+ articles and 28600+ redirects to be reviewed. There are also 2900+ pending AfC submissions. I want to volunteer for helping out in reviewing new pages and AfC submissions to reduce the backlogs. Vestrian24Bio (TALK) 15:05, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Madeforall1
Hello, I will like to request to be giving the rights of a new page reviewer, I’m an experienced Wikipedia editor and I’ve worked on different articles, I wish to be giving a trials so I could support the community, thanks. Madeforall1 (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
User:ToadetteEdit
Trial ends June 16, and backlog drive is nearly over. I am reapplying early since some requests may not be answered after two weeks from now. I would like to review more pages and hopefully clear down the backlog. I have reviewed more than 100 articles so far and only very few were unreviewed. Please consider my reviews and AfDs before processing my application. ToadetteEdit! 18:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
User:PK-WIKI
Experienced editor wanting to contribute to the new page backlog. I was recently granted a trial and did review some pages during that time, but I believe the trial has now expired. Requesting permanent New Page Reviewer permission based on those reviews and my experience in page creations and deletion discussions. PK-WIKI (talk) 22:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
User:CosXZ
I have 547 mainspace edits, have a registered account for 8 months and 22 days, good reputation with many editors, created a mainspace article, have a good understanding of guidelines, have done a few good article reviews, and have no blocks. Cos (X + Z) 22:02, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
User:Cossde
I have been editing for over 15 years, contributing over 1,000+ articles and 27,000+ edits. Lately got into a bit of bother over a topic area. Therefore, want to direct my energies to a new area and contribute to Wikipedia as a New page reviewer. Cossde (talk) 04:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC) User:Mdann52
Permissions previously removed due to inactivity, reqesting restoration following work over at AFC - trying to get back into the content game, so will be looking to improve pages as well as review. Mdann52 (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
User:Grabup
Hey, I have done much AfC reviewing, reviewed over 430 articles, and participated in many AfDs with deep discussions to demonstrate my understanding of Wikipedia's guidelines. I was advised to gain more experience with the deletion process, and I believe I have done so. My previous PERM was declined, saying that my AfDs were SNOWING, which I have since addressed. I think I am ready to review new articles. There is a very big backlog, and I want to help reduce it. GrabUp - Talk 13:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover(add request • view requests)
User:Zanahary
I've been editing seriously for one year, have 4,300+ edits, I've participated in RMs (including initiating them), and I've never had any behavioral blocks. Zanahary (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC) User:Kiran891
I've been an editor for 7+ years with 20K+ edits on Wikipedia, 78K+ edits on Wikidata, and over 8.5k edits on Wikimedia. In past month, I have tagged many files for move and figured I would rather ask for the filemover priviledges instead of duplicating work for other users. I've never been a disruptive editor. Please consider my request. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiran891 (talk • contribs) 2024-06-04T02:05:21 (UTC)
User:AddWittyNameHere
|
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer(add request • view requests)
User:RowanJ LP
I've created many biographies and have a good understanding of Wikipedia policies. I've fixed vandalism many times and fixed many biography of living persons violations. RowanJ LP (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC) User:RITWIK MAHATA
I am requesting for pending changes reviewer rights so that I can review pending changes. Ritwik Mahatat@lk 15:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC) User:Imsaneikigai
I have been editing for around 2.5 years now, with specialised focus on field of entertainment. I also often correct typos or do general fixes on articles of various subjects. I have a good knowledge of wikipedia policies and would like to get this pending changes reviewer rights to broaden by experience and get more expertise of Wikipedia. Imsaneikigai (talk) 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC) User:AlphaBetaGamma
I've done reverting vandalism (Although I was on a hiatus since Golden Week as the vandal level hit 5) for some months now, with my edits growing over 2000 from 89ish including other works, and I request this permission to help with the works. I understand that I did make a misunderstandment couple of weeks ago and I have revised the guidelines to prevent another instance of that happening. (I've been making sure not to miss placing a uw as well). Not planning to request rollbacker until I stop making accidents. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
User:750h+
I have made some very high quality articles (Aston Martin DB9 FA and Aston Martin Rapide at FAC) so I am very familiar with what content is reliable and what is not. I have reverted vandalism (in fact, reverting vandalism was the first edit I made) and whenever i seen vandalism, I take extreme pride in reverting it. Best 750h+ 13:28, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
User:Boneless Pizza!
I have watched listed several article that have been protected as "pending changes" such as Charizard and Woody (Toy Story) and I would love to have an option to accept their edits if its constructive. 🍕Boneless Pizza!🍕 (🔔) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC) User:GoldRomean
I think I have a decent understanding of Wikipedia's policies. I've monitored recent changes and have mostly reverted vandalism whenever I see it, trying my best to always warn them. I think that being a pending changes reviewer will help me continue to positively contribute to Wikipedia. GoldRomean (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2024 (UTC) User:Whisky and more
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback(add request • view requests)
User:Adam Black
|
| Requests for template editor |
|---|
Template editor(add request • view requests)
User:Magentic Manifestations
Hi! I guess I would require this for doing certain edits with respect to certain templates, particularly with respect to Indian territories and transport. I have been making edits to templates within the ambit possible, but there are a couple of protected templates which would need additions (E.g. rint updation). So, it will be useful to have this. Thanks! Magentic Manifestations (talk) 11:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC) User:Sohom Datta
I would like to request temporary template-editor userrights on en.wiki primarily to help out with converting templates to be dark mode compatible. :) Sohom (talk) 14:17, 3 June 2024 (UTC) User:FarmerCars789
I want to have to be in the template editor group because i've already read the info page about Template editors, and also i've saw some mistakes and errors in templates that are restricted to the group i'm requesting. I want to fix them and maybe fix and edit templates locked behind the aforementioned group in the future if needed or for the better. FarmerCars789 (talk) 18:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC) |
Usage
{{Admin dashboard/header}}
{{Admin dashboard/ab}}
{{#ifeq:{{Yesno|{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}|yes|{{#ifexpr:{{#time:U|-{{{showaiv|7 days}}}}}-{{#time:U|{{REVISIONTIMESTAMP:WP:Administrator intervention against vandalism}}}} <= 0|{{Admin dashboard/aiv}}}}}}
{{Admin dashboard/csd}}
{{Admin dashboard/uaarfpp}}
{{Admin dashboard/rfarfp
| 1 = {{{style|}}}{{#if:{{{showperm|}}}|
{{!}} showperm {{=}} {{{showperm}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrfab|}}}|
{{!}} showrfab {{=}} {{{showrfab}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showacc}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showaptl|}}}|
{{!}} showaptl {{=}} {{{showaptl}}} }}{{#if:{{{showawb|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showawb}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showconf|}}}|
{{!}} showconf {{=}} {{{showconf}}} }}{{#if:{{{showfmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showext {{=}} {{{showext}}} }}{{#if:{{{showacc|}}}|
{{!}} showacc {{=}} {{{showevco}}}} }}{{#if:{{{showext|}}}|
{{!}} showfmvr {{=}} {{{showfmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showmms|}}}|
{{!}} showmms {{=}} {{{showmms}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrevr|}}}|
{{!}} shownpr {{=}} {{{shownpr}}} }}{{#if:{{{shownpr|}}}|
{{!}} showpmvr {{=}} {{{showpmvr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showpmvr|}}}|
{{!}} showrevr {{=}} {{{showrevr}}} }}{{#if:{{{showrlbk|}}}|
{{!}} showrlbk {{=}} {{{showrlbk}}} }}{{#if:{{{showte|}}}|
{{!}} showte {{=}} {{{showte}}} }}
}}
{{Admin dashboard/footer|newadmin={{{newadmin|no}}}}}<!--
You can re-arrange the order or pick and choose by transcluding elements separately -->
Note that directly transcluding the template or using all the subtemplates above can cause the page to exceed the post-expand include size.
Parameters
TemplateData for Admin dashboard
Administrators Dashboard
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| style | 1 | Backwards compatibility. Not entirely show of purpose at this time.
| String | optional |
| New administrator | newadmin | Allows you to toggle the 'New administrators' navbox on/off. Set to 'yes' to transclude.
| String | optional |
| Show AIV | showaiv | Allows you to toggle the WP:AIV section on/off. Set to 'no' to prevent transclusion.
| String | optional |
| Show PERM | showperm | Allows control over the entire WP:PERM section in one parameter. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show sections that have had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show RfA/RfB | showrfab | Allows hiding the requests for RfA/RfB section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show account creator | showacc | Allows hiding the requests for account creator section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show autopatrolled | showaptl | Allows hiding the requests for autopatrolled section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show confirmed | showconf | Allows hiding the requests for confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show extended confirmed | showext | Allows hiding the requests for extended confirmed section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show file mover | showfmvr | Allows hiding the requests for file mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show new page reviewer | shownpr | Allows hiding the requests for new page reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show page mover | showpmvr | Allows hiding the requests for page mover section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show reviewer | showrevr | Allows hiding the requests for reviewer section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show rollback | showrlbk | Allows hiding the requests for rollback section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |
| Show template editor | showte | Allows hiding the requests for template editor section of WP:PERM. Setting this parameter to a valid time offset will only show this section if it has had an edit in the specified amount of time.
| String | optional |