User contributions for KatieHepPal

14 April 2015

• 18:3718:37, 14 April 2015 diff hist −421‎ Abortion debate ‎ Removed material in the lead that is not discussed in the body of the article. There are many reasons why women may want to abort and many reasons why some people don't want to allow it.
• 18:2918:29, 14 April 2015 diff hist −55‎ Abortion debate ‎ Reworded sentence.
• 17:3417:34, 14 April 2015 diff hist −131‎ Premarital sex ‎ →‎United States: I removed a statement that presents a rather romanticized take on the subject (I'm sure that mere sexual attraction as opposed to "love" was sufficient for many) and seems to a lack an RS anyway.
• 17:2517:25, 14 April 2015 diff hist +1‎ History of Operation Rescue ‎ →‎1990s: "Lived" to "living." On, substance, however, the fact given here seems questionablet, not to mention flamboyantly worded..
• 17:1617:16, 14 April 2015 diff hist −91‎ Abortion in the United States ‎ It would be better here to make a general statement about the scarcity of abortion providers than to provide specific information which is now outdated.
• 16:5716:57, 14 April 2015 diff hist −25‎ Abortion ‎ →‎Anti-abortion violence: "Coercion" would be too strong a word in this context. "Most recently" isn't an appropriate description here since the source is eight years old.
• 16:5016:50, 14 April 2015 diff hist −589‎ Abortion ‎ →‎Anti-abortion violence: An abortion-rights advocacy group would not be a reliable source for information about its political enemies.

19 March 2015

• 17:5117:51, 19 March 2015 diff hist +6‎ Anti-abortion feminism ‎ →‎Views and goals: "Notes" is one of those words for "say" that we are supposed to avoid. Odd that so much of this article comes from the same source, Professor Oaks.
• 17:3017:30, 19 March 2015 diff hist 0‎ m Kevin Phillips (political commentator) ‎ →‎Southern Strategy
• 17:1417:14, 19 March 2015 diff hist +52‎ Ken Mehlman ‎ Mr.Ambinder's opinion should not be featured in the lead of the biography. Either the "Coming out" or "Reactions" section is the proper place fo rit.

14 March 2015

• 17:4817:48, 14 March 2015 diff hist −722‎ War on women ‎ Undid revision 651113722 by 96.52.180.114 (talk) Refer to the Talk page: PolitiFact.
• 17:4617:46, 14 March 2015 diff hist +1,117‎ Talk:War on women ‎ →‎PolitiFact

1 March 2015

• 19:2319:23, 1 March 2015 diff hist +485‎ Susan B. Anthony ‎ Undid revision 649336942 by Binksternet (talk) Refer to the Talk page: Partisan editing.
• 19:2119:21, 1 March 2015 diff hist +523‎ Talk:Susan B. Anthony ‎ →‎Partisan editing
• 19:0119:01, 1 March 2015 diff hist +12‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ Undid revision 649344604 by Binksternet (talk) Refer to the Talk page: "A number of."
• 19:0019:00, 1 March 2015 diff hist +1,653‎ Talk:Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ →‎"A number of"
• 18:0718:07, 1 March 2015 diff hist −1,009‎ User talk:KatieHepPal ‎ →‎Discretionary sanctions on abortion topic, violating 1RR: Patience. I takes all kinds.

26 February 2015

• 16:5916:59, 26 February 2015 diff hist +12‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ Please refer to the Talk page.
• 16:5716:57, 26 February 2015 diff hist +947‎ Talk:Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎No edit summary
• 16:2916:29, 26 February 2015 diff hist +815‎ Talk:Susan B. Anthony ‎ →‎Partisan editing

25 February 2015

• 21:3321:33, 25 February 2015 diff hist +73‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ I'm sorry, I should have provided a source here since Dellapenna's work had not been used previously in this article.
• 21:2321:23, 25 February 2015 diff hist +485‎ Susan B. Anthony ‎ →‎Views on abortion: Added material fro Dellapenna.
• 21:0521:05, 25 February 2015 diff hist +5‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ Of course, not all scholars who have studied Anthony's view on abortion, agree with the mainly FEMINIST scholarly view here. In fact Joseph Dellapenna accuses THEM of being the historical revisionists.
• 21:0021:00, 25 February 2015 diff hist +6‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ Made a minor grammatical change.

23 February 2015

• 20:0220:02, 23 February 2015 diff hist +1,701‎ Talk:Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎No edit summary
• 19:1419:14, 23 February 2015 diff hist 0‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ →‎Arguments: Mohr didn't exactly say it was "pervasive" but rather resilient to change through the 1870s.
• 19:0419:04, 23 February 2015 diff hist +12‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ →‎Arguments: Let's be clear about the position that Ravinsky was commentating from.
• 18:5918:59, 23 February 2015 diff hist −6‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ →‎Arguments: "points out" is one of those phrasings to avoid.

10 February 2015

• 19:4019:40, 10 February 2015 diff hist +824‎ Talk:Abortion debate ‎No edit summary
• 19:2219:22, 10 February 2015 diff hist +2,345‎ Talk:Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ →‎Tracy Thomas

7 February 2015

• 19:5819:58, 7 February 2015 diff hist +646‎ Talk:Abortion debate ‎ →‎Does the anti-abortion violence section belong in article?
• 18:4418:44, 7 February 2015 diff hist +2,035‎ Talk:Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ →‎Tracy Thomas

6 February 2015

• 21:4021:40, 6 February 2015 diff hist +2,215‎ Talk:Abortion debate ‎ →‎Does the anti-abortion violence section belong in article?
• 18:5218:52, 6 February 2015 diff hist −653‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ →‎Arguments: Refer to Talk page: Tracy Thomas. Ravinsky was speaking here as an opponent of FFl, not as a member disagreeing with a tactic.
• 18:4918:49, 6 February 2015 diff hist −1,426‎ Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ →‎Arguments: Refer to Talk page: Tracy Thomas. Relevance??
• 18:4318:43, 6 February 2015 diff hist +1,696‎ Talk:Susan B. Anthony abortion dispute ‎ →‎Tracy Thomas
• 18:0018:00, 6 February 2015 diff hist −5,778‎ Abortion debate ‎ Refer to Talk page.
• 17:5517:55, 6 February 2015 diff hist +525‎ Talk:Abortion debate ‎ →‎Does the anti-abortion violence section belong in article?

23 January 2015

• 20:0320:03, 23 January 2015 diff hist +1,000‎ Talk:Abortion debate ‎No edit summary
• 19:4719:47, 23 January 2015 diff hist +5‎ Abortion debate ‎ →‎Anti-abortion violence: Do the sources show that anti-abortion violence is widely recognized as such or do THEY merely describe it as such? I think the latter. Also, Refer to Talk.
• 19:4119:41, 23 January 2015 diff hist +2‎ Abortion debate ‎ →‎Anti-abortion violence: Having taken a pretty good look at this source, I've changed what I think is an oversimplified and overly "political" summary of the author's thesis.

15 January 2015

• 00:3700:37, 15 January 2015 diff hist 0‎ m Talk:Abortion ‎ →‎Removal of section
• 00:3200:32, 15 January 2015 diff hist 0‎ m Talk:Abortion ‎ →‎Removal of Section
• 00:3200:32, 15 January 2015 diff hist +190‎ Abortion ‎ Undid revision 642389501 by Dominus Vobisdu (talk) Refer to the Talk page under "Angkor Wat."
• 00:3000:30, 15 January 2015 diff hist +644‎ Talk:Abortion ‎No edit summary
• 00:2000:20, 15 January 2015 diff hist +875‎ Talk:Abortion ‎ →‎Removal of Section
• 00:0600:06, 15 January 2015 diff hist −1,812‎ User talk:KatieHepPal ‎ Undid revision 641815448 by Binksternet (talk) The less said the better

13 January 2015

• 18:4518:45, 13 January 2015 diff hist +1,459‎ Talk:Abortion ‎ →‎Removal of Section

9 January 2015

• 21:1521:15, 9 January 2015 diff hist −1,327‎ Crisis pregnancy center ‎ →‎History and activities: I must have missed this earlier. Regarding Doc James's restoration of the material, my objection was not its sourcing but its redundancy. Already covered in both lead and body of article.
• 21:0521:05, 9 January 2015 diff hist +190‎ Abortion ‎ →‎History: Refer to Talk page: Removal of section.