Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2020-03-01/Op-Ed

Discuss this story

  • That was an interesting article to read. That Glastonbury was so willing to allow 2 photographers through Wikimedia - could be an interesting route for certain areas. Nosebagbear (talk) 20:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
We should act as legitimate press more often. My local user group affiliate has issued press credentials recognized by the U.S. Government for access to their facilities, for instance. ☆ Bri (talk) 20:58, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Very much agree. It was a great shame that Wikinews wasn't able to have simple press pass procedures. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 11:39, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not a new thing. Laura Hale and her WP colleague did well out of it. Too well, if some of the critics are to be believed. Sitush (talk) 22:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • You completely owned on Twitter. Top-class volunteer social media! - David Gerard (talk) 23:59, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-03-01/Op-Ed&oldid=950138069"